Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Productivity of dairy cows under smallholder farms using agro-by-products as a concentrate source

F A Mussa, L P Nkhonjera and R C Mkandawire
Department of Animal Health and Industry, Ministry of Agriculture, P.O. Box 30372, Lilongwe 3, Malawi


Introduction
Background information
Results and discussion
Conclusions
References

Introduction

The programme of smallholder dairy farming was initiated in Malawi by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) through the agency of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), in the early 1970's. The main objectives are:

1. To provide fresh milk for the increasing population.
2. To reduce imports of milk by-products.
3. To provide an alternative source of income to farmers.

Each farmer established a pure stand of Leucaena leucocephala and a mixed stand of Napier grass. In drier areas Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) was also planted, on a minimum of 0.8 ha per two-cow unit. Liberal amounts of a mixture of maize bran and dried leucaena leaves are fed on some farms while the majority of farms use only maize bran. All cows are confined to stalls as a means of conserving energy, for easy detection of heat and to avoid contact with local Malawi Zebu bulls.

Background information

The economy of Malawi depends on agriculture, in which about 90% of the population is involved. Main cash crops include tobacco, tea, groundnuts and rice. Average land holding size is 1.5 ha, and emphasis is therefore on increased production per hectare.

The Government policy on livestock is directed towards self sufficiency in all livestock products and to export any surpluses that arise. However, the country suffers from insufficiency of milk and milk products, sheep and goat meat. Both large and smallholders are integrated in the farming system programme. There are about 1,200 dairy farmers in Blantyre (in the South), Lilongwe (in the Centre) and Mzuza (in the North) who were given ½ Friesian crosses. Upgrading continues on the farms due to the breeding programme being implemented.

This paper describes dairy farming systems before and after 1984.

Dairy farming system before 1984

Records for each cow were kept-from 1973 to 1984. Data collected from these records (over 10 years) was sent to the International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA) where it was analysed with the following objectives:

1. Compare the important reproductive and productive traits.
2. Measure the influence of environment (years, season, etc) on dairy production traits.
3. Assess the suitability of various crosses to the different agricultural areas; and
4. Determine trends in dairy production over the years.

Results and discussion

The results of data analyses covering the years 1973-83 are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Estimated least squares means* for age at first calving, calving interval and days open for smallholder dairy herds (1973-83).

Variable

No.

Age at first calving

No.

Calving intervals (days)

No.

Days open

Overall

165

38.4

577

485

591

213

AREA


Blantyre South

19

38.1

54

461

54

168


Blantyre North

24

40.1

147

512

160

233


Chiradzulu

27

36.6

87

463

87

193


Thyolo North

50

38.5

165

498

165

229


Mulanje West

22

38.2

87

477

88

201


Zomba

23

38.8

37

501

37

238

BREED GROUP


½ Friesian

110

36.7a

432

488

441

216


¾ Friesian

55

40.1b

145

482

150

211

YEAR OF BIRTH


1970

18

37.6a

-

-

-

-


1971

24

37.2a

-

-

-

-


1972

20

41.8bd

-

-

-

-


1973

33

42.2bc

16

471

16

218


1974

20

39.5acd

32

434

32

171


1975

18

36.8a

53

544

53

277


1976

16

34.5a

72

488

72

216


1977

16

37.9acd

101

494

101

221


1978

-

-

118

473

119

203


1979

-

-

96

471

96

202

SEASON OF BIRTH


Nov.-March

38

37.0

35

495

48

222


April-May

42

41.9

47

461

47

188


June-Aug.

43

37.3

50

473

52

206


Sept.-Oct.

42

37.5

49

499

50

228

* Age values followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (P<0.05). Values in other columns did not show a significant difference.

Table 2. Estimated least square means* for total lactation yield, lactation length, milk yield per lactation day and dry period.

Variable

No.

Lact. yield (kg)

Lact. length (days)

Milk yield day (kg)

No.

Dry period (days)

Overall

781

2188

392

5.7

544

107

AREA


Blantyre South

59

2147ad

391a

5.4a

49

107


Blantyre North

189

1761a

417a

4.3b

144

113


Chiradzulu

114

2085de

376ab

5.7a

74

106


Thyolo North

225

2513b

390ab

6.6c

156

116


Mulanje West

126

1851ae

361bc

5.2a

87

117


Zomba

68

2772b

417a

7.1c

34

83

BREED GROUP


½ Friesian

554

1953a

382

5.3a

403

116


¾ Friesian

227

2424b

401

6.2b

141

98

YEAR OF CALVING


1973

-

-

-

-

7

44


1974

29

2061ad

437ade

5.0ae

28

81


1975

49

2510ab

443ae

5.8ace

49

107


1976

74

2463ae

414ade

6.0ac

71

107


1977

122

2523bef

440a

5.9adf

77

120


1978

160

2580cbe

402ef

6.8b

78

102


1979

149

2444ab

386ef

6.6bc

79

134


1980

106

2285abf

384cdf

6.3bcd

53

144


1981

45

1864d

373bdf

5.0ef

26

132


1982

36

1701d

352bdf

5.0ae

12

103


1983

11

1451d

289bc

4.8ad

-

-

MONTH OF CALVING


January

74

2144a

402ab

5.5

46

84


February

78

2240a

409ab

5.6

56

89


March

50

2764b

454a

6.0

34

125


April

65

2352b

402ac

6.1

41

101


May

52

2113a

438ad

5.4

42

88


June

62

2167a

357bc

6.0

42

99


July

72

2176a

375bcd

6.0

48

119


August

67

1954a

374bcd

5.2

44

121


September

71

2061a

369bc

6.0

47

170


October

63

1982a

348bcd

5.7

51

114


November

73

2304a

394ac

5.9

58

89


December

54

2045a

381bcd

5.4

35

89

* Group values followed by the same letter do not differ significantly (P<0.05).

In the Blantyre North area, where rainfall was only about 700 mm, the age of heifers at their 1st calving was later than that in the other areas. Birth in years of higher rainfall resulted in earlier ages at 1st calving, and the 50% Friesian heifers delivered their first calf 3 months earlier than the 75% Friesian heifers.

Long open periods (and hence long calving intervals) may be ascribed to improper management and/or reproductive problems, but problems of management of artificial insemination (heat detection, time of insemination and attendance to calls etc.), are likely to be significant.

Agricultural area, breed group, year and month of calving and area by breed interaction each had a significant effect on total lactation milk yield (Table 2). Total milk yield was highest in Zomba and Thyolo North where feed resources are more uniform throughout the year and where most farmers were new to livestock farming. In these areas farmers were prepared to accept innovations from extension agents more readily than their counterparts elsewhere who had previous experience in raising the Malawi Zebu, and who resisted the idea that crossbred cows should be managed differently. In addition, smallholder dairy operations were first started in Thyolo North and farmers in that area had gained more experience in handling crossbred cows than farmers elsewhere.

Crosses with 75% Friesian blood produced significantly more milk than the 50% crosses (2424 kg versus 1953 kg). Cows that calved in bad years, in terms of rainfall distribution, produced significantly low milk yields. Likewise cows that calved between November and April produced more milk than those that calved between May and October. These differences also closely followed the monthly rainfall distribution which determines the availability of feed.

The longer lactation length is attributed to the following factors:

1. Where farmers realised that cows that calved in a favourable month were capable of producing more milk there was a tendency to milk these cows longer. It can also be a reflection of the problems associated with management of artificial insemination.

2. Dry periods were associated with decreases in lactation lengths; this suggests that the shortening of the lactation length was a result of constraints (most likely feed availability) that forced cows to dry up while the foetuses they were carrying were still young.

Dairy farming system after 1984

From Tables 1 and 2 it is evident that productivity of cows in smallholder farms was low. The need was recognized to develop feed resources that would allow an increase in total animal productivity without increasing the size of land holdings. Small holder dairy farming has been based on Napier grass, Rhodes grass, groundnut haulms and banana chops to provide roughage while maize and rice bran have been the main concentrates. The establishment of more agro-industries has given rise to the availability of by-products which can be utilized to compound dairy animal concentrates. The interest in the programme is to maximise daily yields per cow through the feeding of a balanced ration with agro-by-products as the main ingredients. The formulations of concentrates prepared by the feedlot company (Southern Malawi) and the Government farm (Central Malawi) are shown respectively in Tables 3 and 4.

Table 3. Composition of a dairy concentrate manufactured by the Feedlot Company (Southern Malawi)

Ingredients

Kg/100 kg of concentrate

kg CP

kg TDN (kg)

Urea

1.0

2.7

-

Cottonseed cake

25.0

10.0

18.2

Molasses

10.0

0.4

6.8

Maize bran

61.0

5.5

47.6

Monocalcium phosphate

2.0

-

-

Salt

1.0

-

-


100.00

18.6

72.6

Table 4. Composition of a dairy concentrate made at the Government farm (Central Malawi)

Ingredient

kg/100 kg of concentrate

kg CP

Maize

45.0

3.6

Groundnut cake

19.5

8.6

Cottonseed cake

12.0

4.2

Wheat middlings

20.0

3.0

Dicalcium mineral

2.5

-

Salt

1.0

-


100

19.4

The concentrate mixtures shown in Tables 3 and 4 have been in use only relatively recently at the smallholder level. In the Southern area, Holstein/Friesian cows on the smallholder farms have been found to produce a mean 2,900 kg milk in an average lactation of 170 days (mean 16.3 kg/d), while on the Government farm in Central Malawi, average figures of 4,880 kg during an average lactation of 259 days (mean 18.8 kg/d) have been recorded. Strict comparisons of these data is not possible because of differences in rations used, and the fact that machine milking was employed on the Government farm, but the figures give an indication of the levels of production that may be expected, and could encourage the acceptance of higher yielding breeds by smallholders particularly those who intend to go into dairy as a full time farming activity.

Conclusions

Many areas of Malawi are geographically unsuitable for producing and sustaining good stands of crops or forages. With the increase in the availability of agro-byproducts and the identification of private firms prepared to undertake milling a production of dairy concentrates from these materials, the potential of the smallholder dairy business in Malawi appears promising. Many Friesian x Malawi Zebu cows have proved capable of high milk yields, and crosses appear superior to the Friesian in this environment.

References

Agyemang K. and Nkhonjera L.P. 1984. Evaluation of crossbred cattle productivity on the smallholder farms and on Government units in the Republic of Malawi.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page