|
No. |
Recommendations of '89 Review |
ICRAF's Implementation |
Panel's Remarks |
Score* |
|
1. |
Negotiation with IDRC on the legal positions of ICRAF vis-a-vis the executing agency |
Action was taken and confirmed in a letter from IDRC to chair of BoT |
Action was taken as indicated. |
2 |
|
2. |
Donor Support Group (DSG) request to World Bank to act as DSG Secretariat |
Request was made by Chair of DSG to World Bank but the request was declined. DSG was dissolved in 1991 during admission of ICRAF into the CGIAR. |
|
1 |
|
3. |
Review of ICRAF's restricted projects |
In 1991, budget on a "cost centre format" was established. All projects were classified as CORE and complementary as per the CGIAR definition, as shown in 1991, 1992 and 1993 budgets & programmes of work. |
Reclassification took place. However, no evidence of attempts to negotiate this reclassification with donors as recommended by the 1989 Review. Donors' reaction to classification is unknown. |
1 |
|
4. |
Donors providing increased core funds to ICRAF |
No specific action was taken on this recommendation. The proportion of core unrestricted vs. core restricted funds remains similar in 1992 as it was in 1989 (i.e. 45% unrestricted, 55% restricted). The percentage of complementary funds is currently 6%. |
|
1 |
|
5. |
International professional staff |
All international staff positions are advertised internationally through various channels. |
Action taken as indicated. However, it is not clear whether a nationally recruited professional staff's position will be automatically upgraded to international status on the acquisition of a Ph.D. in line with the spirit of Recommendation 5. |
2 |
|
6. |
Professional staff policies |
ICRAF developed a policy in 1992 for post doctoral candidates and visiting scientists. |
ICRAF is silent on the implementation of the accepted recommendations for enhancement of grade 1-3 to make them sufficiently competitive to attract specialized staff such as professional accountants and computer programmers. |
1 |
|
7. |
Detailed policy on selection of ICRAF staff for training |
No action has been taken in terms of a policy. |
No reason was given for non-implementation. |
0 |
|
8. |
Field staff proficiency in local languages |
In almost all cases, field staff already know more than two languages including the local languages of the region where they are working. |
|
2 |
|
9. |
Three management positions |
A Budget Officer has been recruited. Post of Management Accountant is budgeted for 1992 and that of Internal Auditor for 1994. A new Director of FINAD assumed duties on 1 August, 1992. |
|
2 |
|
10. |
Reversal of accrued staff benefits |
This was reversed in 1989. |
Implementation further confirmed during presentation to BoT. |
2 |
|
11. |
Improvement to financial reporting (Strong recommendation) |
Head of Finance was recruited in 1990; budgeting and accounting system has been transformed to a "project cost centre based system", with monthly reports to project leaders, programme coordinators, division administrators and senior management. |
Confirmed from the officers listed in column 3. |
2 |
|
12. |
Formalizing overdraft facilities |
In 1989 overdraft facility of $500,000 was negotiated with CITIBANK, New York. |
Implementation was confirmed during presentation to BoT. |
2 |
|
13. |
Working capital (Strong recommendation) |
Identified as a budget line item but ICRAF has never reached a level of provision of one month operating expenditure. |
Amount expected at the end of the 1992 financial year is $600,000. |
2 |
|
14. |
Headquarters Building Deficit (HBD) |
HBD was absorbed into the operating fund. The entire operating deficit was removed in 1991. |
Implementation was confirmed during presentation to BoT. |
2 |
|
15. |
Restricted project funds as current liabilities |
The recommendation was effected immediately. |
|
2 |
|
16. |
Budgetary controls (Strong recommendation) |
A rigorous procedure has been introduced. Main control mechanisms are coding by division administrators, monthly management report, half-yearly budget revisions. |
Implementation confirmed during BoT meeting. |
2 |
|
17. |
Explicit research agenda |
A detailed research programme has been developed and an ICRAF strategy has been developed. |
Confirmed during field visit to Machakos. |
2 |
|
18. |
Laboratories at Machakos |
Machakos Station is currently being developed for soil and plant analysis. |
Confirmed during field visit to Machakos. |
2 |
|
19. |
Soil science staff at ICRAF |
Soil science capacity has been strengthened. Both the DG and Director of Research are soil scientists. |
Implementation is confirmed. |
2 |
|
20. |
Emphasis on on-farm and MPT research |
Various aspects of the recommendation have been implemented. (See details in ICRAF's notes). |
Implementation is confirmed. |
2 |
|
21. |
MPT research |
This programme has grown in importance and includes many new activities. (See details in ICRAF's notes). |
Implementation will form part of activities envisaged under the MPT Germplasm Centre. |
2 |
|
22. |
Collaboration with IARCs |
ICRAF has active collaboration in Africa with ICRISAT and IITA. Active collaboration exists with ILCA on MPT germplasm. (See additional details in ICRAF's notes). |
Degree of collaboration with IITA, ILCA and ICRISAT will be ascertained in a letter to the three Centres mentioned. |
2 |
|
23. |
Joint surveys with ILRAD and ILCA |
Not yet implemented. |
|
0 |
|
24. |
Support for on-farm research |
To ensure multidisciplinarity, ICRAF has recruited a forester, agronomist and soil scientist into Programme 5 (on-farm research). (See further details in ICRAF notes). |
Confirmed during presentations to the Panel. |
2 |
|
25. |
Formal procedures for monitoring scientific work |
Implemented procedures include specialized workshops/meetings, rigorous evaluation of programmes, formal scientific conferences and annual planning and review meeting (APR). |
Implementation was confirmed during various presentations to the Panel. |
2 |
|
26. |
Formal programme review |
Annual planning and review has been instituted. |
An APR was in progress during the current review exercise. |
2 |
|
27. |
Restructuring of divisions |
In 1990, ICRAF established one Research Division with 5 "strategic" research programmes and the networks. A Division of Training and Information was also established. |
During the current session of BoT Information and Documentation (Programme 8) and Communications (Programme 9) have been amalgamated to form a new Division/Department of Dissemination. |
2 |
|
28. |
INFOCOM strategy |
Implementation is as outlined in ICRAF Strategy document. |
Confirmed. |
2 |
|
29. |
INFODOC strategy |
Has been implemented as outlined. |
Confirmed. |
2 |
|
30. |
INFOCOM building |
No capital development has taken place at Headquarters since the last review. |
Confirmed. |
2 |
|
31. |
Expansion of social science research (Strong recommendation) |
ICRAF has expanded social sciences research at field sites. |
Implementation was confirmed by various presentations to the Panel for the period 1989-91. But the relative strength is not reflected in the Medium-Term Plan. |
2 |
|
32. |
Computer capability |
Computer hardware and software have been streamlined (See additional details in ICRAF notes). |
Confirmed. |
2 |
|
33. |
Training trainers |
Fully implemented |
Confirmed during presentations to the Panel. |
2 |
|
34. |
Decentralization of training |
Close to 50% of ICRAF training course now take place outside of Headquarters. |
Confirmed. |
2 |
|
35. |
Strategy 2000 |
Document prepared but subsequently replaced by "ICRAF The Way Ahead" |
Confirmed. |
2 |
|
36. |
More emphasis on indigenous tree species |
Recommendation has been implemented. (See ICRAF's notes) |
Confirmed. |
2 |
* 0 = None implementation
1 = Partial implementation
2 = Full implementation