Thumbnail Image

Food safety implications from the use of environmental inhibitors in agrifood systems











FAO. 2023. Food safety implications from the use of environmental inhibitors in agrifood systems. Food Safety and Quality Series, No. 24. Rome.






Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production – A review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions 2013
    Also available in:

    Animal agriculture substantially contributes to the world economy by providing food, jobs, and financial security for billions of people. With increasing concerns over global climate change and pollution, efforts are underway to reduce the overall environmental impact of animal production. This document analyses emission of non-carbon dioxide greenhouse gases, an important segment of the environmental footprint of animal production. It has been developed by a team that included experts in animal /ruminant nutrition, manure and soil management, animal and whole-farm modeling, and animal reproduction. Over 900 publications focusing on nutritional and manure management mitigation strategies for methane (enteric or from manure) and nitrous oxide emissions were reviewed and analysed, and a synthesis of feed-, animal management- and manure management-based mitigation approaches and interactions amongst them has been presented. This document will help researchers, animal industry consultants, policy-makers, animal producers, non-governmental organizations, and other groups with interest in maintaining a viable and environmentally-responsible animal production sector to make sound decisions on selection and adoption of effective and economically feasible greenhouse gas mitigation practices.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Reducing enteric methane for improving food security and livelihoods
    Project Highlights 2015-2017
    2019
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    “Reducing enteric methane for improving food security and livelihoods” is a collaboration between the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre (NZAGRC). The project is funded by the Climate and Clean Air Coalition, the FAO, and the New Zealand Government through its support of the Livestock Research Group (LRG) of the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases (GRA). The project supports 13 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia and Latin America to identify system-specific technologies and interventions to increase livestock productivity, food security and reduced enteric methane emissions per unit of product. The project seeks to provide guidance to decision-makers engaged in the policy discourse on instruments/mechanisms, recommendations on incentives and institutional framework necessary to incentivize adoption of productivity-enhancing technologies and practices. This report highlights the achievements of the project from 2015 to 2017 and upcoming activities.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (stand-alone)
    Options for low emission development in the Tanzania dairy sector - reducing enteric methane for food security and livelihoods 2019
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    Given the importance of the dairy sector to livelihoods and its potential role in poverty reduction, this study evaluates the potential for improving milk production while reducing enteric methane (CH4) emission intensity from dairy production in Tanzania. The study reveals that improved management practices and technologies can increase milk productivity while reducing methane emission intensity in both traditional and improved dairy systems. The economic analysis shows that in improved systems, all interventions assessed were cost-beneficial, however the analysis indicates that in traditional systems, both the baseline scenario and mitigation options present economic returns of less than 1. Although the economic analysis might not directly support the application of mitigation practices in traditional systems, the study does not exclude the importance of mitigation action focusing specifically on traditional systems since their existence and persistence is already threated by the effects of climatic variability and climate change. All the mitigation options analyzed in this study presented significant gains in productivity, which in practice can generate improvements in food and nutrition security, as well as boost farmers’ incomes. Moreover, some of the mitigation options can maintain and/or improve herd parameters, feed resources and water supply during and after climate shocks, supporting these systems to move from relief to resilience.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.