Thumbnail Image

Biofortification: a food-systems solution to help end hidden hunger








  • Availability, agronomic, and nutritional properties of biofortified crops worldwide;
  • Evidence on farmer adoption and consumer acceptance, the nutrition and health benefits, and the cost-effectiveness of biofortified foods;
  • Figures on the number of people growing and benefiting from biofortified crops;
  • Answers to frequently-asked questions about biofortification.


Last updated date 30/03/2021, see corrigendum



Also available in:
No results found.

Related items

Showing items related by metadata.

  • Thumbnail Image
    Document
    Biofortification: Evidence and lessons learned linking agriculture and nutrition 2013
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    Biofortification, the process of breeding nutrients into food crops, provides a comparatively cost-effective, sustainable, and long-term means of delivering more micronutrients. The biofortification strategy seeks to put the micronutrient-dense trait in those varieties that already have preferred agronomic and consumption traits, such as high yield and disease resistance. Marketed surpluses of these crops may make their way into retail outlets, reaching consumers first in rural and then urban ar eas. Progress to date in breeding and delivering biofortified crops is discussed. The nutrition evidence on bioavailability and efficacy is growing. Completed nutrition studies for each crop are briefly discussed. Human studies have included a variety of technologies, including stable isotope methods, which are among the most powerful to measure bioavailability and efficacy. Efficacy and effectiveness studies are available for orange-fleshed sweetpotato (OFSP); full evidence is not yet available for biofortified maize, cassava, or golden rice, but initial bioavailability and efficacy results are promising. Efficacy trials have been completed for iron crops (beans and pearl millet) and evidence for zinc biofortification is still developing. Food-based approaches to improve nutrition face challenges in providing rigorous evidence that they can deliver nutrition improvements in a cost-effective and timely manner. The experience of delivering OFSP is reviewed and discussed, including the c hallenges of marketing a visible trait and changing perceptions of OFSP as merely a food security crop. Whether implementing or integrating OFSP programs, strong and effective partnering practices are required; strategies for successful implementation of cross-sectoral nutrition sensitive programming are discussed. Biofortification is yet to be fully scaled-up in a single country, but much evidence and experience has been assembled to support its eventual effectiveness. Policies to support cross sectoral implementation at all levels, as well as increasing the evidence base, will contribute to making biofortification a cost-effective investment in a more nourishing future.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Book (series)
    Evaluation of the project “Improving Food Security and Nutrition in the Gambia through Food Fortification”
    Project code: GCP/GAM/038/EC
    2023
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    This European Union-funded project aimed to improve the nutritional and health status of vulnerable populations suffering from micronutrient deficiencies, particularly women, girls and children, in the Central River Region and the North Bank Region of the Gambia. The evaluation found that the project was relevant as it addressed undernutrition through industrial and biofortification of foods, a globally accepted approach and a cost-effective way to help improve vitamin mineral status. Further, the project helped to strengthen national capacities of key national institutions. The project was also instrumental in influencing policy formulation on industrial and biofortification and establishing intersectoral coordination. The evaluation makes a number of recommendations, which include continuation of strengthening operational and technical capacity in the Gambia on industrial and biofortification, and increased investment in food fortification programming, given its high relevance as a tool to combat challenges of malnutrition in the Gambia.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Project
    Improving Food Security, Nutrition and Health of Vulnerable Women and Children in The Gambia - GCP/GAM/038/EC 2023
    Also available in:
    No results found.

    The Gambia is classified as a low-income-food-deficit country. Seventy-one per cent of the population live below the USD 2 per day poverty line and in 2014 the country was ranked 172 of 187 in the United Nations Human Development Index. Food insecurity and malnutrition are also high. The 2013 National Demographic Household Survey found that two-thirds of children under five, one-third of pregnant women, and 16 percent of lactating mothers had vitamin A deficiency. Despite significant advances in the reduction of undernutrition, the Gambia is still affected by micronutrient deficiencies. Fortification is the addition of one or more micronutrients to a staple food to correct, prevent or reduce micronutrient deficiencies; while biofortification is the process of enhancing the nutritional value of crops by increasing the density of vitamins and minerals in a crop through either conventional plant breeding, agronomic practices or biotechnology. Regulations for food fortification existed only for iodized salt in the country, and while there were programmesproviding some supplements, they were clearly insufficient. Against this background, the European Union-funded project aimed to assist the Government to improve the food and nutrition security of vulnerable women and children in targeted regions, by focusing on ensuring access to and the consumption of micronutrient-rich foods and industrially fortified and biofortified foods.

Users also downloaded

Showing related downloaded files

No results found.