Forum global sur la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition (Forum FSN)

Consultations

Renforcement des systèmes alimentaires urbains et péri-urbains pour assurer la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition dans le contexte de l’urbanisation et de la transformation rurale

 À la demande du Comité de la sécurité alimentaire mondiale (CSA), le Groupe d’experts de haut niveau sur la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition (HLPE-FSN) a élaboré le rapport intitulé «Renforcement des systèmes alimentaires urbains et péri-urbains pour assurer la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition dans le contexte de l’urbanisation et de la transformation rurale». Le rapport du HLPE-FSN sera présenté à la cinquante-deuxième session plénière du CSA en octobre 2024.

Par le biais de cette consultation électronique, le HLPE-FSN souhaite obtenir votre avis sur le champ d'application proposé pour ce rapport et sur les questions indicatives ci-dessous.

CHAMP D'APPLICATION ET JUSTIFICATION

Près de 60 pour cent de la population mondiale vit actuellement dans des centres urbains (DESA, 2018; Acharya et al., 2020). Ceux-ci sont considérés comme des moteurs de croissance et d’emploi qui produisent plus de 80 pour cent du PIB mondial, mais qui sont également confrontés à d’énormes défis pour ce qui est de garantir l’accès de tous les résidents aux services essentiels que sont la santé, l’éducation, le transport et la nourriture (ibid.). La population urbaine connaît un accroissement particulièrement fort en Afrique et en Asie. Les 15 villes à la croissance la plus rapide au monde sont toutes situées en Afrique. Parallèlement à cette urbanisation, on assiste à un « découplage géographique » (Langemeyer et al., 2021) des villes par rapport aux sources d’approvisionnement alimentaire, en raison de l’utilisation des terres urbaines et péri-urbaines réorientées vers des « usages plus rentables ». Ainsi, les villes perdent rapidement les terres agricoles péri-urbaines, qui leur fournissaient depuis toujours des aliments frais et sains. Les zones urbaines connaissent également une fréquence plus élevée de phénomènes météorologiques extrêmes qui compromettent la subsistance et les revenus des populations, tandis que les inégalités entre populations urbaines se creusent (Pelling et al., 2021). Du fait de ces évolutions, les zones urbaines et péri-urbaines concentrent également les risques d’insécurité alimentaire et de malnutrition, comme on a pu le constater lors de la pandémie de covid-19 (voir, par exemple, Rede PENSSAN, 2021), encore exacerbés par les catastrophes naturelles et les conflits. Dans le même temps, ces zones regorgent de ressources et constituent des centres d’éducation, de technologie et d’innovation, d’offre de services sanitaires et sociaux, ainsi que de production, de transformation et de distribution d’aliments, autant de rôles qui peuvent être renforcés.

Dans les quartiers pauvres des villes, les activités économiques et commerciales informelles sont souvent essentielles à la sécurité alimentaire, mais elles sont généralement négligées au niveau politique et réglementaire. Les systèmes alimentaires informels comprennent un réseau complexe de fournisseurs, de transporteurs, de colporteurs, de détaillants et de vendeurs de rue et de marchés, en plus des agriculteurs, et rend les aliments plus accessibles et plus abordables pour les consommateurs urbains. Or, ces acteurs du secteur informel s’appuient principalement sur leurs propres ressources et capitaux et ne bénéficient, pour renforcer leurs entreprises et en garantir la qualité, que d’un faible soutien politique en termes d’intelligence du marché, de transport et de logistique, de chaînes du froid ou d’installations de réutilisation des déchets (Tefft et al., 2017). En fait, en l’absence de planification précise des systèmes alimentaires, la vente et la consommation d’aliments hautement transformés augmentent dans la plupart des centres urbains, tandis que le commerce local qui garantit des aliments sains et frais à des prix abordables, et souvent en plus petites quantités, y est négligé, ce qui a contribué à la création de ce qui a été appelé « des déserts alimentaires » . Ce phénomène a eu des répercussions négatives sur la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition (Peyton, Moseley et Battersby, 2015; Battersby, 2017; Acharya et al., 2020).

Cette incohérence stratégique se traduit par un manque général de coordination entre les politiques et les acteurs concernés par la sécurité alimentaire, l’environnement, etc. et la planification urbaine. Cette situation est encore exacerbée par le manque général de données, d’analyses et d’éléments empiriques dont on a besoin au niveau des villes pour éclairer la prise de décisions sur les questions d’alimentation urbaines et péri-urbaines. C’est pourquoi il est difficile, pour les décideurs, de planifier, de hiérarchiser, de concevoir et de suivre les interventions dans les systèmes alimentaires des zones urbaines et péri-urbaines. De plus, les gouvernements et les systèmes d’alerte rapide face aux risques de famine n’ont pas non plus été aussi performants dans le suivi de l’insécurité alimentaire dans les zones urbaines qu’ils l’ont été dans les zones rurales, au-delà d’indicateurs très élémentaires tels que les prix des aliments (Moseley, 2001; Krishnamurthy, Choularton et Kareiva, 2020).

Les villes peuvent jouer un rôle essentiel dans l’élaboration de politiques relatives aux systèmes alimentaires qui renforcent leur résilience de différentes manières. Elles peuvent, au besoin, s’approvisionner en aliments cultivés localement ou de manière régénérative, faciliter la production urbaine et péri-urbaine durable d’aliments nutritifs, éviter le gaspillage alimentaire et en renforçant les investissements dans la bioéconomie circulaire (définie au sens large comme une économie fondée sur l'utilisation, la réutilisation et la régénération durables des ressources naturelles), créer des marchés alimentaires inclusifs en investissant dans des infrastructures qui permettent aux petits commerçants et détaillants de commercialiser des produits alimentaires plus sains. Elles peuvent également jouer un rôle pour favoriser la résilience en atténuant les effets négatifs du changement climatique et en s'y adaptant (HLPE, 2020 ; Heck et Alonso, 2021).

L’agriculture urbaine et péri-urbaine est une option importante qui peut avoir des effets positifs sur la diversité alimentaire, la qualité des espaces urbains et l’action et l’autonomisation des communautés. Or, dans la plupart des villes, notamment dans les pays du Sud, cette agriculture ne bénéficie que d’un soutien public limité. Au contraire, la réglementation en vigueur dans les villes et la valeur marchande croissante des terrains limitent les possibilités de production locale. Selon une enquête récente de la FAO, les autorités municipales jouent un rôle énorme pour identifier et mettre en relation les acteurs des systèmes alimentaires et favoriser ainsi l’émergence d’initiatives locales innovantes propres à améliorer la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition (FAO, 2020). Face aux conséquences dramatiques de la pandémie, par exemple, les jardins potagers ont fourni des compléments alimentaires sains et nutritifs ainsi que des services écosystémiques (Lal, 2020). Les marchés locaux se sont multipliés, tout comme les livraisons à domicile de paniers d’aliments frais par des producteurs familiaux et les initiatives de dons alimentaires aux communautés à faibles revenus. De nombreux habitants des zones urbaines, en particulier les migrants, les sans-papiers et les travailleurs informels, ont été contraints de s’adresser aux banques alimentaires et aux organisations caritatives, ce qui a grandement nui à leur dignité et à leur agencéité (Rao et al., 2020). Ces expériences soulignent l’importance et le potentiel que revêt la dimension territoriale des systèmes alimentaires pour la réalisation du droit humain à l’alimentation (Recine et al., 2021).

Compte tenu de l’importance sociale et économique des zones urbaines, il est impératif de relever les défis posés par l’urbanisation en matière de transformation rurale pour « reconstruire en mieux » après la pandémie de covid-19, et les perturbations des chaînes d'approvisionnement causées par la guerre en Ukraine, les conflits internes et les catastrophes naturelles. Les politiques doivent impérieusement s’attaquer à la pauvreté et aux inégalités, renforcer la résilience et l’inclusion sociale et favoriser la pérennité des moyens d’existence. Les besoins spécifiques des divers contextes ruraux et urbains, les différences entre les différents types d’environnements urbains (par exemple, les mégalopoles et les villes situées dans des zones essentiellement rurales), ainsi que les liens entre ces éléments dans les relations urbaines-rurales, doivent être pris en compte dans la formulation des politiques alimentaires. Ainsi, le Nouvel Agenda Urbain appelle à intégrer la sécurité alimentaire et nutritionnelle dans la planification urbaine et territoriale (ONU-Habitat, 2016). Le rapport pourrait également explorer les questions spécifiques concernant la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition auxquelles les villes sont confrontées dans les situations de conflits, de catastrophes naturelles et d'autres crises, en particulier en cas de dépendance vis-à-vis des importations alimentaires et de vulnérabilité à la volatilité des prix.

Une analyse plus approfondie des systèmes alimentaires est nécessaire dans le contexte de l'urbanisation et de la transformation des zones rurales pour garantir le respect du droit à la sécurité alimentaire et nutritionnelle, dans ses six dimensions (HLPE, 2020). Le rapport pourrait notamment étudier le potentiel des marchés territoriaux et informels, de l'économie circulaire et des chaînes d'approvisionnement plus courtes pour renforcer les liens entre la production et la consommation alimentaires urbaines et péri-urbaines. Le rôle des environnements alimentaires dans les zones urbaines est particulièrement important, compte tenu de la coexistence de la distribution organisée (supermarchés) avec les marchés territoriaux et informels, et des effets néfastes de la supermarchandisation qui évince les petits commerces alimentaires et/ou informels (Peyton et al. 2015). Ainsi, certaines parties des villes, souvent les plus pauvres, sont devenues des "déserts alimentaires" pour les produits frais et sains, ce qui affecte les régimes alimentaires urbains, déjà caractérisés par une priorité croissante accordée aux aliments transformés et prêts à consommer. En outre, les centres urbains, et notamment les zones d'habitat informel, sont souvent caractérisés par le manque d'infrastructures de base telles que l'accès à l'eau potable et au réseau d'égouts. Il faut donc accorder une attention particulière aux besoins en eau et en assainissement par rapport à l'utilisation des aliments dans les zones urbaines et péri-urbaines.

Dans le même temps, les zones urbaines et péri-urbaines abritent des innovations intéressantes pour la production, la transformation et la distribution de denrées alimentaires, telles que les jardins verticaux, les groupes d'achat éthiques et les innovations en matière de marketing, qui pourraient être reproduites dans d'autres contextes. Pour renforcer le rôle des systèmes alimentaires urbains et péri-urbains, il est essentiel de réfléchir à l'architecture de la gouvernance en matière de sécurité alimentaire et de nutrition, et notamment à la manière dont les conseils municipaux, les experts en urbanisme et les autres partenaires peuvent s'engager auprès des acteurs traditionnellement impliqués dans les systèmes alimentaires et les politiques de sécurité alimentaire et de nutrition afin de renforcer les synergies. Certaines des mesures politiques recommandées ces dernières années pour renforcer le rôle des systèmes alimentaires urbains et péri-urbains portent sur la promotion d'un accès équitable aux terres et aux ressources agricoles productives pour les petits producteurs. Elles incluent également l'investissement dans les infrastructures rurales et urbaines, le développement de marchés territoriaux et de chaînes d'approvisionnement courtes, la priorité donnée aux personnes vivant dans la pauvreté dans les villes et les zones rurales pour qu'elles aient accès à des aliments nutritifs et à des conditions de vie plus saines, et l'anticipation de l'avenir interconnecté de l'urbanisation et de la transformation des zones rurales (HLPE, 2020 ; Heck et Alonso, 2021).

À partir des résultats du Groupe de travail à composition non limitée (GTCN) du CSA sur l'urbanisation, la transformation rurale et les implications pour la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition (CFS 2017/44/6 et CFS 2016/43/11), de publications récentes et de débats d'orientation, le rapport explorera ces questions et formulera des recommandations de politique générale à l'attention du CSA.

QUESTIONS POUR ORIENTER LA CONSULTATION ÉLECTRONIQUE SUR LE CHAMP D'APPLICATION DU RAPPORT HLP-FSN

Le HLPE-FSN sollicite votre avis sur le champ d'application proposé pour le rapport «Renforcement des systèmes alimentaires urbains et péri-urbains pour assurer la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition dans le contexte de l’urbanisation et de la transformation rurale», et vous invite en particulier à :

A

Faites-nous part de vos commentaires sur les objectifs et le contenu proposé pour ce rapport, tels que décrits ci-après.

Pensez-vous que le champ d'application proposé est suffisamment large pour permettre d'analyser et de discuter des questions clés concernant le rôle des systèmes alimentaires urbains et péri-urbains dans la réalisation de la sécurité alimentaire et de la nutrition? Y a-t-il des lacunes ou des omissions majeures?

B

Faites-nous connaître les bonnes pratiques et les expériences réussies en matière de renforcement des systèmes alimentaires urbains et péri-urbains dans le contexte de l'urbanisation et de la transformation rurale, y compris dans les situations d'urgence ou de conflit.

C

Veuillez partager la littérature récente, les études de cas et les données qui pourraient aider à répondre aux questions suivantes :

1.            Quels sont les principaux goulets d'étranglement qui freinent la contribution des systèmes alimentaires urbains et péri-urbains à la sécurité alimentaire et à la nutrition?

2.            Comment transformer les systèmes alimentaires urbains et péri-urbains et les rendre plus équitables et accessibles, aussi bien pour les acteurs du système alimentaire qu'en termes de sécurité alimentaire et de résultats nutritionnels?

3.            Comment renforcer la résilience des chaînes d'approvisionnement alimentaire urbaines, formelles et informelles, locales et mondiales, afin de garantir la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition en milieu urbain?

4.            Quels changements faut-il apporter à la planification urbaine pour mieux soutenir toutes les dimensions de la sécurité alimentaire, y compris le soutien aux droits de l'homme, à l'agencéité et à la durabilité? Comment renforcer l'action des acteurs locaux dans les systèmes alimentaires urbains et péri-urbains? 

5.            Comment les autorités nationales et municipales peuvent-elles renforcer les potentialités des villes à faible émission de carbone, inclusives, relativement auto-suffisantes et résilientes pour améliorer la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition à la suite du changement climatique et d'autres crises?

6.            Quelles sont les politiques les plus appropriées (et les lacunes des politiques existantes) dans le cadre du continuum rural-urbain pour résoudre les problèmes de régime foncier, d'expansion urbaine sur les terres agricoles et de concurrence croissante pour les ressources naturelles?

7.            De quelle manière les systèmes alimentaires urbains et péri-urbains peuvent-ils garantir la satisfaction des besoins alimentaires et nutritionnels de groupes spécifiques de personnes, tels que les migrants, les personnes déplacées à l'intérieur du pays, les enfants, les adolescents, etc.?

8.            Les marchés territoriaux peuvent-ils renforcer la sécurité alimentaire et la nutrition des populations urbaines, et quels sont les avantages et les défis qu'ils représentent?

9.            En quoi l'incorporation de pratiques liées à l'agriculture résiliente au climat et à l'économie circulaire dans l'agriculture urbaine et péri-urbaine peut-elle apporter des co-bénéfices pour tous sur le plan climatique et renforcer la résilience climatique?

10.         Comment les citoyens peuvent-ils être impliqués et habilités à conduire des processus inclusifs, transparents et participatifs pour les transformations urbaines, en assurant les synergies et la complémentarité avec les conseils municipaux?

11.         Comment les expériences des communautés urbaines pour améliorer l'accès aux aliments frais et aux régimes alimentaires sains peuvent-elles inspirer des politiques publiques plus larges?

Les conclusions de cette consultation seront utilisées par le HLPE-FSN pour élaborer le rapport, qui sera ensuite rendu public dans sa version préliminaire pour consultation électronique, puis soumis à un examen par les pairs, avant d'être parachevé et approuvé par l'équipe de rédaction du HLPE-FSN et le comité directeur.

Nous remercions par avance tous les collaborateurs pour avoir lu, commenté et fourni des informations sur la portée de ce rapport du HLPE-FSN. Les commentaires sont les bienvenus dans en anglais, français et espagnol.

Le HLPE-FSN se réjouit d'une riche consultation!

Évariste Nicolétis, Coordinateur HLPE-FSN

Paola Termine, Chargée de programme HLPE-FSN

 


BIBLIOGRAPHIE

Acharya, G. Cassou, E. Jaffee, S., Ludher, E.K. 2020. RICH Food, Smart City: How Building Reliable, Inclusive, Competitive, and Healthy Food Systems is Smart Policy for Urban Asia. Washington, DC, World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/35137   

Battersby, J. 2017. Food system transformation in the absence of food system planning: the case of supermarket and shopping mall retail expansion in Cape Town, South Africa. Built Environment, 43(3): 417-430.

FAO. 2020. Cities and local governments at the forefront in building inclusive and resilient food systems: Key results from the FAO Survey “Urban Food Systems and COVID-19”, Revised version. Rome.

Heck, S. & Alonso, S. 2021. Resilient Cities Through Sustainable Urban and Peri-Urban Agrifood Systems. Montpellier, France, CGIAR. Resilient-Cities.pdf (storage.googleapis.com)

HLPE. 2020. Food security and nutrition: building a global narrative towards 2030. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/ca9731en/ca9731en.pdf

Krishnamurthy, P. K., Choularton, R. J., & Kareiva, P. 2020. Dealing with uncertainty in famine predictions: How complex events affect food security early warning skill in the Greater Horn of Africa. Global Food Security, 26: 100374.

Lal, R. 2020. Home gardening and urban agriculture for advancing food and nutritional security in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Food Security, 12: 871-876. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-020-01058-3

Langemeyer, J., Madrid-López, C., Mendoza Beltrán, A. & Villalba Mendez, G. 2021. Urban agriculture — A necessary pathway towards urban resilience and global sustainability? Landscape and Urban Planning, 210: 104055. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204621000189

Moseley, W. G. 2001. Monitoring urban food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Geographical Review, 21(1): 81-90.

Pelling, M., Chow, W. T. L., Chu, E., Dawson, R., Dodman, D., Fraser, A., Hayward, B. et al. 2021. A climate resilience research renewal agenda: learning lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for urban climate resilience. Climate and Development, 0(0): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.1956411

Peyton, S., Moseley, W. & Battersby, J. 2015. Implications of supermarket expansion on urban food security in Cape Town, South Africa. African Geographical Review, 34(1): 36-54.

Rao, N., Narain, N., Chakraborty, S., Bhanjdeo, A. & Pattnaik, A. 2020. Destinations Matter: Social Policy and Migrant Workers in the Times of Covid. The European Journal of Development Research, 32(5): 1639–1661. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590571/

Recine, E., Preiss, P.V., Valencia, M. et al. 2021. The Indispensable Territorial Dimension of Food Supply: A View from Brazil During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Development, 64: 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00308-x    

Rede Brasileira de Pesquisa em Soberania e Segurança Alimentar (Rede PENSSAN). 2021. VIGISAN National Survey of Food Insecurity in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Brazil https://olheparaafome.com.br/VIGISAN_AF_National_Survey_of_Food_Insecurity.pdf

Tefft, J., Jonasova, M., Adjao, R. & Morgan, A. 2017. Food systems for an urbanizing world. Washington DC, World Bank and Rome, FAO.

UNDESA (UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs). 2018. 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. New York. Cited June 2022. https://desapublications.un.org/file/615/download

UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlements Programme). 2016. The New Urban Agenda. Nairobi. https://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf

Cette activité est maintenant terminée. Veuillez contacter [email protected] pour toute information complémentaire.

*Cliquez sur le nom pour lire tous les commentaires mis en ligne par le membre et le contacter directement
  • Afficher 96 contributions
  • Afficher toutes les contributions

A.

  • The proposed scope is quite comprehensive but it lacks focus on women's empowerment in addressing food and nutrition security in the context of urbanization and rural transformation.
  •  Emphasis on food safety, food wastage and food & nutrition loss in the food production and food supply chain is also required. 
  • An inclusive urban design can play a key role in fostering food security in the urban and peri urban areas.  

B. Successful experiences on strengthening urban and peri urban food systems

Farmers' collectives with the help of private partners/ startups have helped maintaining the food supply chains during Covid-19 in India. Few of the examples are 

  • Agrify Organic Solutions, 

It is a Mumbai-based startup had volunteered to home deliver fresh vegetables and fruits during the Covid-19 lockdown and had worked with 500 farmers in Nashik district of India. The procedure followed was 

All the farmers engaged with the startup pack the vegetables and store in clean warehouses from where it goes to Mumbai.

A 6-tonne capacity truck traveled to the metro city every day carrying 2500 boxes from where it is distributed to the housing societies.

All the payments were made via digital modes and a customer was expected to pay only after the delivery.

The boxes were delivered at one point of contact in the society, and every customer was expected to open the box in their house for hygiene purposes.

  • Sahyadri Farms

Sahyadri Farms via its unique inclusive partnership with farmers has built a strong capability over the years in areas of primary processing of food and vegetables, semi-processed products like frozen & aseptic; processed products like fruit jams; tomato ketchup; fruit beverages and food and vegetables waste processing under an integrated zero discharge processing facility.



Sahyadri Farms began with the mission to ensure that the small-landholding farmers of India are given fair compensation for their produce and labour. This was achieved by adhering to global standards of agricultural practices, world-class infrastructure, international food safety standards, and the will to deliver safe, hygienic, and healthy food to the consumers.

During Covid-19 Sahyadri Farms (A Farmers’ Producers collective), was delivering assorted fresh vegetable boxes in Mumbai, Nasik and Pune.

Consumers were able to choose from separate fruits and vegetables boxes and also  with all the staples that they might need.

They were also delivering to housing societies with bulk orders.  

  • These successful example can guide us in designing a sustainable food supply chain that can ensure food and nutrition security even during the emergency conditions.

M. M.Cayetano Yagüe

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid /Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Espagne

Aplaudo esta iniciativa. Muchas gracias.

A) En primer lugar creo que objetivo del informe es el adecuado. Lo único que puede inquietarme es la gran diversidad del componente "urbano", ya que hay distintos tipos y morfologías de ciudades, no es igual una ciudad centroeuropea ni cumple las mismas dinámicas sobre su zona "periurbana", de tal forma la expansión de la agricultura urbana depende de la morfología urbana en sí.

B) Hay muchos casos reseñables, sin embargo querría promocionar a los colegas del VAAM- HUNAM. Es un visualizador de ambiente alimentario y gracias a el se pueden establecen puntos de distribución de alimentos. Es una herramienta muy sencilla de trasladar a otros países.

Ortega-Avila, A.G. (2022), Visualizador de Ambiente Alimentario de México (VAAM).Link de acceso: https://vaam.shinyapps.io/vaam/

The observations and comments therein are based on my experience with a hope they will of some use.

Do you find the proposed scope comprehensive to analyze and discuss the key issues concerning the role of urban and peri-urban food systems in achieving food security and nutrition? Are there any major gaps or omissions?

Not many. Gaps will surface during Pragmatization.

1.Food loss and waste prevention to a larger extent is important for betterment of urban and per-urban food systems.

2. MNCs and other foundations can divert their funds intended for charity to purchase foods that go waste

3. In view of the space constraint Vertical Expansion of Food Production is more feasible to meet location specific demands.

Share good practices and successful experiences on strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems in the context of urbanization and rural transformation, including in the case of emergencies or conflicts?

The White Spot Disease in Tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon) resulted in devastating losses to the aquaculture industry. All the aquaculturists switched on to Pacific White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Details of highly successful case study provided below.   

Introduction of new shrimp species Litopenaeus vannamei has brought a sea change in Indian shrimp production and processing industry. Andhra Pradesh is a leading state in cultured shrimp production and the present study investigates the changing trends in cultured shrimp production and its impact on seafood processing of the State. Results of the study showed that 83.6% of the cultured shrimp production in Andhra Pradesh was attributed to L. vannamei. With the increase in production, structural changes became pre-requisite for seafood processing firms and they have incorporated changes such as establishment of additional plants, increasing the capacity utilization of existing plants and installation of more efficient equipment. There was an increase of 37.12% in installed capacity and 53.1% increase in capacity utilization of shrimp processing plants due to increased shrimp production. Spill-over effects were visible; employment opportunities and income of the employees increased. Strict implementation of scientific farming techniques and quality management are vital to sustain growth of the industry (Ashok, A.,  et al, 2015)

Ref: Arathy Ashok, L. N. Murthy, B. Madhusudana Rao, Jesmi Debbarma, M. M. Prasad1, V. Geetha Lakshmi and Nikita Gopal (2015). Impact of Pacific White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) on Shrimp Production and Seafood Processing in Andhra Pradesh. Fishery Technology 52: 53 – 57.

Based on the experience in-puts were provided for each query

  1. What are the main bottlenecks hampering the contribution of urban and peri-urban food systems to food security and nutrition?

i. Continuous increase in urban population.

ii. Migratory nature of population of intra-country and inter-country

  1. How can urban and peri-urban food systems be transformed and made more equitable and accessible both for food system actors and in terms of food security and nutrition outcomes?

1. Better transportation, especially for perishable food produce

2. Development of innovative value added products from glut produce. This caters to the urban nutritive requirements and also improvement in socio-economic conditions of the primary producers.

  1. How can urban food supply chains, formal and informal, local and global, be made more resilient to ensure food security and nutrition within urban settings?

1. Incentvize all the players to ensure quality from farm to fork

2. Development quality guidelines for all miscellaneous products.

  1. What changes are needed in urban planning to better support all dimensions of food security – including support for human rights, agency and sustainability? Which are some of the measures that can strengthen the agency of local actors in urban and peri-urban food systems? 

1. Provide sufficient space for sale of produce

2. Hand holding of Small players  in Business, Planning and Development

3. Making all transactions virtual. 

 

  1. How can national and municipal governments strengthen the potential for low-carbon, inclusive, relatively self-sufficient and resilient cities and towns to drive improved food security and nutrition in the wake of climate change and other crises?

1. Enhancement in application of solar energy

2. Transportation  by electrical vehicles

  1. What are the most appropriate policies (and gaps in existing policies) along the rural-urban continuum to address issues of land tenure, urban expansion into farmland and the growing competition for natural resources?

1. Absence of guidelines.

2. Implementation of existing policies.

  1. How can urban and peri-urban food systems ensure that food and nutrition needs of specific groups of people, such as migrants, the internally-displaced, children, adolescent, etc., are met?

This is very good question. All the times world over efforts are centered on enhanced level of food production and nutritive values of the same but not satiates of ethnic or migrant populations. This is not a major problem for South Asia that harbors one fifth of world population as food habits of habitants are more or less same. However, satiety needs can be met with imitation products.

  1. What are the potential benefits and challenges of territorial markets for strengthening food security and nutrition for urban populations?

1. Over all development in economy, GDP are immediate benefits

2.If we concentrate on population per se big players get benefit and if it is territorial markets small scale businesses develop.

  1. In what ways can the incorporation of climate resilient agricultural and circular economy practices in urban and peri-urban agriculture provide climate co-benefits for all and enhance climate resilience?

1. Reduction in poverty levels.

2. Generation of sustainable income.

3. Enhancement in wellbeing of humans. This in turn better health and lessening of DALY, improved QALY and ILY. Enhanced levels of productivity. Less burden on exchequer of respective nations in managing infections

  1. How can citizens be engaged and empowered to drive inclusive, transparent, participatory processes for urban transformations, ensuring synergies and complementarity with city councils?

As mentioned earlier making everything, virtual with simplest possible local language .   

  1. Which experiences of urban communities to increase access to fresh food and healthy diets can inspire broader public policies?

1. Reduction in lifestyle diseases.

 

Didem Mahsunlar

Turkey

Dear leaders - I received and would like to contribute to the scope of Strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems to achieve food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation

I find the proposed scope comprehensive  but potential 2 directions would add more relevant depth to cover some gaps and omissions:

-Scope within boundaries: Provisioning and evaluating resources of cities and supporting gaps as per urban boundaries and mapping of current state vs future state would create a measure for self sufficiency and a road to transformation. This analysis and language especially in state of emergency like earthquakes, famines, wars.. are lacking this clarity of preparedness ,mitigation and recovery stages.



Especially water- food and energy logistics would be key pillars to strengthen in the food security context. A similar study is prepared for Istanbul city with the context of emergency preparedness especially for risks as earthquakes and other potential climate related risks.



-Virtual trade of resources and impact within boundaries: Impact of food miles and embedded resources at the point of consumption ( or waste at that matter) is not immediately referred to and acted against. CREATE project ( Cross-Border Climate Vulnerabilities and Remote Impacts of Food Systems of the EU, Turkey and Africa is investigating Trade, Climate Risk and Adaptation across trade routes and products with the aim to address remote climate risks and impacts related to food systems, Cross Border Vulnerabilities of food also applies to city boundaries and able to develop a novel cross-border climate risk/impact assessment methodology for food value chains based on embedded resource use (e.g. water, land, carbon) trade concept . See more in Create4climate.com “Strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems to achieve food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation”
,

Looking fwd to further collaboration and input. Kind regards

 
Didem Mahsunlar
Sn R&D Consultant - Food Chain

I. Talk of urban food systems, and rooftop vegetable and fruit gardens for regular supply of fresh fruits and vegetables is an immediate thought. With growth of gated communities and urban apartment complexes in cities, this can be a viable proposition, where producers themselves are consumers and creating employment for gardeners. There should also be a mechanism of waste recycling by production of vermicompost to enhance soil fertility and even biogas production if feasible. Likewise, common area in urban slums can be managed by self help groups of women to grow and sell vegetables. 

II. Reducing food loss and waste should be a major initiative in all urban areas, as part of food systems transformation:  

i. City corporations need to have initiatives for collection of waste from wet markets and its processing. The private sector can be encouraged to partner in this.  Energy generation from food waste can be explored. 

ii. Initiatives for collection of unused food from restaurants and eateries and its redistribution to the needy will help reduce food loss.  

III. Fruit trees should be planted in parks and open spaces, with an eye on nutrition. An example is the number of jackfruit (national fruit of Bangladesh) trees along the streets and in parks in Dhaka

IV. Cities such as Kolkata and Dhaka with abundant freshwater bodies can promote freshwater aquaculture; fish processing enterprises can be promoted.

V. The Covid-19 pandemic clearly brought home the relevance of shorter, local value chains. An urban-peri urban connect of producers and consumers may be created for sourcing of vegetables, fruits, milk, and the like.

VI. The poor, destitute, and aged, should be covered by Social Protection schemes, for food security. Urban Employment Guarantee initiative for creation of public works can provide employment and create purchasing power.

VII. Access to safe drinking water, Rainwater harvesting and recycling of waste water have to be part of the urban food system transformation agenda. 

  

Visakha Tillekeratne

FAO
Sri Lanka
  1.  One of the most important pre-requisites in starting this line of change is to convince people about the issue. The gravity of not strengthening systems in the urban and peri urban arena should be communicated in simple and elegant language. Communities should change their behavior about the importance of local food security through facts and figures.
  2. The burden of doing extra work in the midst of sometimes hectic urban schedules should be given high consideration, especially women who are most often tending the household, to caring for children, dealing with violence and also working in the garden. Careful assessments should be made of the number of hours of ALL work by both males and females. Based on this agriculture should be made convenient, with starter packs, easy grow methods and also information on quantification of the optimum number of plants required according to number of family members and how much produce would be yielded. When this info is put out there, it is very convincing.
  3. The impact of urban produce on local markets and also rural produce marketing in urban centres is another aspect
  4. Hygiene and sanitation implications of disposal of plant matter is another consideration as post harvest losses as well as discarded elements could increase the garbage load in urban centres if not carefully managed.
  5. GAP will be important if not there is a danger of chemicals lying around and being a hazard to the households.
  6. The nutrition mainstreaming and landscaping of home gardens are two important elements. Therefore households should for example be convinced to have 7 different vegetables, 7 types of greens and different types of fruit for diversity of the diet throughout the week. This requires training their minds for planning the garden as well as planning their menu.

Hope this will be helpful

Visakha Tillekeratne

Consultant FAO Sri Lanka

Yes, the report provides a clear picture on how food systems can be transformed for the benefit of the cities/town population. There is a need to trade-off between agriculture production and agro-processing in the context of urban vs rural setting, due to the fact that there is inadequate land in the towns/cities. The issue of land has been covered well, but it needs more emphasis regarding putting policies on availability and affordable land for food and agriculture production in the town planning processes. By the way, I am not sure if is there any country with a policy on urban and peri-urban food systems?

If possible, the government may look at resettlement initiatives as many cities and towns are unplanned (squatters). And also, link the urban food systems with youth and women in terms of accessing technologies, knowledge and farming skills – how the R&D institutions can target urban food production.

The most critical aspect from food production right to consumption is food waste among urban populations – thus the need to devise technologies and supportive measures targeting the households. This also can go in tandem with mindset change in terms of food habits and culture.

The report is silent on indigenous food, as this is critical for food diversification and nutrition in urban population. Currently, many of the urban populations are the ones who suffer a lot in non-communicable diseases as opposed to the rural populations, implying that consumption of local food has led to healthier being. It is also imperative to emphasize food safety as most of the water sources in our cities/towns, particularly in the Global South are more polluted

How can we make the food supply chains more efficient and economical, something which will attract bankable investments and lure more entrepreneurs. In this regard, there is a need to raise educational campaign for any urban farming to apply highly adaptable and resilient technologies and innovations.

The need to devise urban food security platforms for sharing the practices and issues among proponents of the urban food systems, and also most importantly, particularly at the Municipal/City Councils to assign a desk or focal point responsible for overseeing urban food systems. The said platforms can also organize annual conferences for sharing information. But at the entry point, we need to develop a baseline data, and subsequent time series dataset against which, the performance/ achievement and impact can be derived – a strong M&E systems. I want also to emphasize here that the report should state for sound and coherent data and information which can be input a e-database/platform – this can also assist in conducting urban and peri-urban food system simulation and prediction.

M. Ahmed Sourani

Gaza Urban & Peri-urban Agriculture Platform (GUPAP)
Territoire palestinien occupé

Urban and peri-urban agriculture is a key strategy to enhance resilience of local food system notably in protracted crisis conditions, GUPAP is facilitating and supporting 2 relevant community-led spaces; Urban Women Agripreneurs Forum (UWAF) and City Food System Actors Network (CFSAN). Please see attached informative files and GUPAP website gupap.org  

Dear CFS/HLPE-FSN Team,

Thank you for the opportunity given to me to provide feedback. Kindly see our contributions and case study below.

I’m sharing the following contributions from my experience as a Farmer and Commodity trader:

1.            What are the main bottlenecks hampering the contribution of urban and peri-urban food systems to food security and nutrition?

One of the bottlenecks hampering the contribution of urban and peri-urban food security and nutrition is high cost of labor and unqualified human capital caused by urban-rural migration. Most city dwellers today are migrants and internally displaced persons who use to be smallholder farmers in the rural areas in times past. The youth have abandoned the farms and sojourned for white collar jobs and greener pastures leaving behind the old and aged adults and women as food producers.  Those who were forcefully displaced by climate events such as floods and insecurity challenges also migrated and added to the population number of urban dwellers resulting in too many mouths to feed, but less human and natural resources to produce enough food in abundance.

2.            How can urban and peri-urban food systems be transformed and made more equitable and accessible both for food system actors and in terms of food security and nutrition outcomes?

Urban and peri-urban food systems can be transformed with the elevation and promotion of indigenous food systems which are mostly staple foods in an average home in low-income countries. Increasing the production capacity of smallholder farmers and women to grow more indigenous food crops will make urban and peri-urban food systems to become more equitable, available, accessible and affordable all year round.

3.            How can urban food supply chains, formal and informal, local and global, be made more resilient to ensure food security and nutrition within urban settings?

Urban food supply chains, formal and informal, local and global can be made more resilient to ensure food security and nutrition with urban settings through favorable agricultural policy and regulatory frameworks, sufficient finance schemes, strong domestic research and innovations, strong government investments in agriculture.

4.            What changes are needed in urban planning to better support all dimensions of food security – including support for human rights, agency and sustainability? Which are some of the measures that can strengthen the agency of local actors in urban and peri-urban food systems?

The changes that are needed in urban planning to better support all dimensions of food security – including support for human rights, agency and sustainability increased access to land, establishment of food producers and market clusters, enforcement of price control and volatility regulations. The above mentioned measures if implemented that can strengthen the agency of local actors in urban and peri-urban food systems

5.            How can national and municipal governments strengthen the potential for low-carbon, inclusive, relatively self-sufficient and resilient cities and towns to drive improved food security and nutrition in the wake of climate change and other crises?

Women are catalysts and agents of change, to drive inclusive self-sufficient and resilient cities and towns to drive improved food security and nutrition in the wake of climate change and insecurity threats; national and municipal governments strengthen the potential and production capacity of women small-scale food processors to curb food loss and waste.

6.            What are the most appropriate policies (and gaps in existing policies) along the rural-urban continuum to address issues of land tenure, urban expansion into farmland and the growing competition for natural resources?

Establishment of home-grown gardens in the urban settings and agricultural clusters in the rural areas especially in communities that have comparative advantage to most sought-after staple and indigenous food crops to address issues of land tenure, urban expansion into farm lands and the growing competition for natural resources.

7.            How can urban and peri-urban food systems ensure that food and nutrition need of specific groups of people, such as migrants, the internally-displaced, children, adolescent, etc., are met?

From my experience as a farmer and commodity trader, I observed that most staple foods even when they are in season are not available, accessible and affordable. The daily food and nutrition need of the vulnerable population such as migrants, the internally displaced, pregnant women, children and adolescents dwelling in the urban areas are never met as a result of this. The interference of middlemen who manipulate and extort the farmers to sell at lower prices with small profit, still make it impossible in such a way that is even when they are available, most times not too fresh or too expensive and out of reach for the common man on the street. This is where price regulations from market forces such as commodity boards should come into play to enforce price control and volatility regulations. Unfortunately, there’s an insignificant existence of this price regulation bodies in low-income countries, rather what we have is intermittent artificial scarcity of food created most times by traders and commodity associations especially when they are in high demand. I’m suggesting that in the absence of existing commodity boards in the meantime, policy makers and Regional Trade Areas (RTAs), farmers traders, distributors. Processors, transporters and all actors in the food value chain should come to a roundtable dialogue and find a lasting solution to all this unnecessary spike in food prices in urban and peri-urban areas.

8.            What are the potential benefits and challenges of territorial markets for strengthening food security and nutrition for urban populations?

The potential benefits of having territorial markets for strengthening food security and nutrition for urban population is increased profit and production capacity of farmers and other actors in the value chain. But there’s also the danger of monoculture cultivation of crops that are in high demand by city dwellers to the neglect of most nutritious and more affordable indigenous food crops. 

Another major challenge is the infiltration of territorial markets with imported processed exotic foods. This discourages city dwellers and consumers from patronizing local farmers and other food value chain actors, after laboring for so much with little or nothing to show or have adequate return on their investments.

9.            In what ways can the incorporation of climate resilient agricultural and circular economy practices in urban and peri-urban agriculture provide climate co-benefits for all and enhance climate resilience?

Development of farm markets in the cities and urban centers for easy market access to farmers to avoid food loss, middlemen exploitation and also help them sell their farm produce at a good price to earn more profit.

10.         How can citizens be engaged and empowered to drive inclusive, transparent, participatory processes for urban transformations, ensuring synergies and complementarity with city councils?

More provision of finance schemes and increased access to public procurement, standard conformity and certification of products for safe consumption.

11.         Which experiences of urban communities to increase access to fresh food and healthy diets can inspire broader public policies?

Provision of necessary infrastructures in the rural areas such as roads, water, irrigation facilities and power supply can catalyze increase access to fresh food and healthy diets that is also affordable and accessible all year round.

Asikaralu Okafor, Executive Director

Village Farmers Initiative (VFI) Nigeria.