Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) Toolbox

森林认证

Forest certification ©SAILD/Fombana
“森林认证”模块提供有关森林认证作为一种促进森林资源可持续利用的基于市场的第三方自愿机制方面的基础和更详尽信息。这一模块阐述了何为森林认证,在森林管理认证与监管链认证之间进行了区分,列举了收益和成本,也描述了森林管理者需要采取何种步骤来获得森林认证。它也提供促进森林认证获取、合规和适用方面的工具和个案的链接。

Basic knowledge

What is forest certification?

Forest certification is a voluntary process whereby an independent third party (the “certifier”) assesses the quality of forest management and production against a set of requirements (“standards”) predetermined by a public or private certification organization. Forest certification, and associated labelling, is a way of informing consumers about the sustainability of the forests from which wood and other forest products were produced.

There are two types of forest certification:

  1. certification of forest management, which assesses whether forests are being managed according to a specified set of standards; and
  2. certification of the chain of custody (sometimes referred to as CoC certification), which verifies that certified material is identified or kept separate from non-certified or non-controlled material through the production process, from the forest to the final consumer. To label an end-product as certified, both forest management certification and chain-of-custody certification are required.

Most forest management certification standards address a wide range of economic, social, environmental and technical aspects of forest management, including the well-being of workers and of families living in and around the forest area subject to certification.

The PEFC’s criteria for SFM standards

Criterion 1: Maintenance and appropriate enhancement of forest resources and their contribution to the global carbon cycle

Criterion 2: Maintenance of forest ecosystem health and vitality

Criterion 3: Maintenance and encouragement of productive functions of forests (wood and non-wood)

Criterion 4:  Maintenance, conservation and appropriate enhancement of biological diversity in forest ecosystems 

Criterion 5: Maintenance and appropriate enhancement of protective functions in forest management (notably soil and water)

Criterion 6: Maintenance of other socioeconomic functions and conditions

Criterion 7: Compliance with legal requirements

The FSC principles

Principle 1: Compliance with laws

Principle 2: Workers’ rights and employment conditions

Principle 3: Indigenous peoples’ rights

Principle 4: Community relations

Principle 5: Benefits from the forest

Principle 6: Environmental values and impacts

Principle 7: Management planning

Principle 8: Monitoring and assessment

Principle 9: High conservation values

Principle 10: Implementation of management Activities

In more depth

The concept of forest certification arose as a way of addressing public concerns about tropical deforestation and forest degradation. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), which pioneered forest certification in the early 1990s, was created as a result of collaboration between environmental non-governmental organizations, forest product companies and social interest groups. Today, there are more than 50 certification schemes addressing a wide variety of forest types, tenure and management regimes.

The Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) is the largest certification framework in terms of forest area, accounting for about two-thirds of the total certified area worldwide, while the FSC is the fastest-growing scheme (by certified area). By 2013, the FSC and the PEFC combined had issued more than 10 000 certificates for nearly 400 million hectares of forest, of which approximately 90 percent was located in Europe and North America.

Some countries have developed their own national forest certification standards, procedures and agencies, usually based on an international model. Some logging companies and their representative organizations have also established forest standards, although these are generally less rigorous than those set by the major certification schemes. It has been noted that the existence of so many certification schemes and standards may confuse consumers and thus jeopardize one of the original aims of certification, which was to provide consumers with clear, reliable information on the status of the forests from which their timber purchases were obtained.


Resources

Loading...