|Pays, régions, bassins fluviaux|
|Ressources en eau|
|Usages de l'eau|
|Irrigation et drainage|
|Ensembles de données|
|Cartes et données spatiales|
Info pour les médias
|Visualisations et infographies|
|ODD Cible 6.4|
Kura Araks Basin
|Year: 2009||Revision date: --||Revision type: --|
|Regional report:||Water Report 34: English or Arabic|
The Kura-Araks River Basin is a transboundary basin with a total area of about 190 110 km2 of which 65 percent is located in the South Caucasus countries: 31.5 percent in Azerbaijan, 18.2 percent in Georgia and 15.7 percent in Armenia. The remaining part is distributed between the Islamic Republic of Iran (19.5 percent of the basin) and Turkey (15.1 percent) (Lehner et al, 2008) (Table 1). The Kura-Araks River Basin is situated south of the Caucasus Mountains. Its borders are northeastern Turkey, central and eastern Georgia, and the northwestern part of the Islamic Republic of Iran. It contains all the territory of Armenia and more than two-thirds of Azerbaijan. The Kura River rises in Georgia and the Araks River in Turkey and both join in Azerbaijan about 150 km before its mouth at the Caspian Sea.
The geographical location of the South Caucasus at the border where the humid Mediterranean and dry continental air masses meet, the complex mountainous relief and other factors have conditioned the diversity of climate zones across the region, from everlasting snow caps and glaciers to warm humid subtropical forests and humid semi-desert steppes. Average annual precipitation in the basin is estimated at 565 mm, although it varies all along the basin territory. The annual average temperature of the entire Kura–Araks River Basin is estimated at 9 ºC. Average temperature in January is –4 ºC although it can drop to –13 ºC in the coldest places of the basin. In July, average temperature reaches 22 ºC, although in the hottest places it can increase to 28 ºC (New et al, 2002). The climate of Armenia, which is entirely located in the basin, is highland continental: hot summers and cold winters. Average annual temperature is 5.5 °C. Summer in Armenia is moderate, with the average temperature for July at 16.7 °C, and in the Ararat Valley it varies in the range of 24–26 °C. Winters are quite cold, with an average temperature of –6.7 °C. Total annual precipitation in Armenia is 592 mm. The driest regions are the Ararat Valley and the Meghri region, where the annual precipitation is 200–250 mm. The maximum precipitation, observed in high mountainous areas, is more than 1 000 mm annually. Azerbaijan is situated at the northern extremity of the subtropical zone and two-thirds of the country is located in the Kura–Araks River Basin. Its climatic diversity is caused by the complicated geographical location and landscape, the proximity of the Caspian Sea, the effect of the sun’s radiation, and air masses of different origin. The climate in Azerbaijan is continental. Arid weather with average summer temperatures above 22 °C is observed in the lowlands. In the mountain regions, temperatures may be below 0 °C in winter. Humid tropical weather is observed in the coastal zone near the Caspian Sea, mainly in the Lankaran lowlands in the southeast. The average precipitation is estimated at 447 mm/year. Almost half of Georgia, the eastern part, is located in the Kura–Araks River Basin, which has a subtropical dry climate with relatively cold winters and arid, hot summers. The average precipitation varies between 500 and 1 100 mm/year. About 80 percent of the rainfall occurs from March to October, while the longest dry period is about 50–60 days. Drought years are common. There is a need for irrigation in the areas where precipitation is less than 800 mm/year. Average temperatures vary between –1 °C in January and 22 °C in July.
Finally, as far as Turkey and the Islamic Republic of Iran are concerned, only a small part of the country, 4 and 2 percent respectively, is located in the Kura–Araks River Basin.
Average population densities are 128 persons/km2 in Armenia, 93 persons/km2 in Azerbaijan, and 78 persons/km2 in Georgia. There are three cities with an excess of 1 million inhabitants in the South Caucasus: Baku (Azerbaijan), Tbilisi (Georgia), and Yerevan (Armenia) (Ewing, 2003).
A majority of the population of the Caucasus still lives below the poverty line. Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has decreased roughly by 50 percent since 1991, poverty levels have reached 60–80 percent, and unemployment has skyrocketed. Even though all three countries have shown signs of macroeconomic recovery and progress in the implementation of structural reforms, there has been emigration from the region to the Russian Federation, Turkey, the Persian Gulf, and the West (Vener, 2006).
The Kura River, with a total length of 1 515 km, rises in Georgia and flows into Azerbaijan before entering the Caspian Sea. It has an average discharge of 575 million m3 per year. Two of its tributaries rise in Turkey: the Mtkvari, with an inflow from Turkey estimated at 0.91 km3/year, and the Potskhovi, with an inflow estimated at 0.25 km3/year. The inflow of the Debet River, a southern tributary of the Kura River, is estimated at 0.89 km3/year from Armenia to Georgia. The annual flow from Georgia to Azerbaijan of the Kura Basin is 11.9 km3 and the annual flow of the Agstay from Armenia to Azerbaijan is about 0.35 km3/year.
The Araks River originates in Turkey and after 300 km forms part of the international border between Armenia and Turkey, then for a very short distance between Azerbaijan and Turkey, between Armenia and the Islamic Republic of Iran, and between Azerbaijan and the Islamic Republic of Iran. The Araks River is about 1 072 km long and it has an average discharge of 210 million m3 per year (Berrin and Campana, 2008). The total annual flow from Armenia to Azerbaijan through the Araks River and its tributaries (Arpa, Vorotan, and Vokhchi) is estimated at about 5.62 km3, and from the Islamic Republic of Iran is estimated at 7.5 km3. The Araks River joins the Kura River in Azerbaijan about 150 km before its mouth at the Caspian Sea.
With respect to storm water and sewage effluent discharges, the Kura–Araks River Basin receives 100 percent of Armenia’s, 60 percent of Georgia’s, and 50 percent of Azerbaijan’s deficit (Berrin and Campana, 2008).
The South Caucasus countries are faced with water quantity and quality problems. In general terms, Georgia has a lot of water, Armenia has some shortages due to poor management, and Azerbaijan has a lack of water; moreover, its groundwater is of poor quality. In Georgia, the main use of the Kura–Araks water is agriculture. In Armenia it is agriculture and industry whereas in Georgia drinking water is withdrawn from a large fresh groundwater stock. In Azerbaijan, the Kura–Araks water is the primary source of freshwater, and 70 percent of drinking water comes from these rivers. In general, water is used for municipal, industrial, irrigation, fishery, recreation, and transportation purposes. The main water use is agriculture, followed by industry and households uses (Berrin and Campana, 2008).
During the Soviet era and also in the post-Soviet period, large volumes of effluents were discharged into surface water bodies by the municipal, industrial and agriculture sectors, causing pollution of both surface water and groundwater. The largest source of pollution is municipal wastewater, which pollutes the rivers downstream of large cities with organic matter, suspended solids, surfactants, etc. Industrial wastewater discharges also are high, polluting surface water with heavy metals, oil products, phenols and other hazardous substances. In Georgia, for example, large industrial facilities producing manganese, ammonia, machinery, etc. together with arsenic, copper and gold mining and processing plants, oil refineries and power plants pollute the river bodies of the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea basins with heavy metals, oil products, phenols and other toxic substances. In Armenia and Azerbaijan, different industries also have discharged high loads of pollutants into the Kura and Araks rivers and their tributaries (UNEP, 2002). Agricultural return flows also contribute to the Kura–Araks pollution with pesticides such as DDT (Berrin and Campana, 2008). On its way through Turkey and the Islamic Republic of Iran, there is also a large populated area with an advanced industry, which increases the pollution in the Kura–Arak rivers.
The total area equipped for irrigation in the Kura–Araks River Basin is estimated at between 2 and 2.5 million ha, of which Azerbaijan accounts for approximately 45 percent, the Islamic Republic of Iran 21 percent, Georgia 14 percent, Armenia 11 percent and Turkey 8 percent. Agricultural water withdrawal is about 19 km3.
During the Soviet era, the Caucasus was an important agricultural region that supported the entire USSR. Soviet agriculture was highly inefficient and suffered from poorly equipped infrastructure. At present, agriculture remains the main sector in the region, employing a significant amount of the population. In the Soviet period, from the 1970s to 1980s, industry in the Caucasus was well developed. The major industrial sectors were oil and gas, chemicals and machinery, ferrous and non-ferrous metals, cement, fertilizer, light manufacturing, and food processing. This rapid industrial development resulted in increased environmental pressures. After the USSR was dismantled, industrial production declined sharply because of the energy crisis and the dissolution of economic ties among the former Soviet Republics. Recently, some signs of industrial revival have appeared. However, the growth rate is still insignificant (Vener, 2006).
The main Kura and Araks rivers have only two reservoirs but the tributaries have more than 130 major reservoirs. Table 2 shows the large dams in the Kura–Araks River Basin, i.e. dams with a height of more than 15 metres or with a height of 5–15 metres and a reservoir capacity greater than 3 million m3 according to the International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD).
During the Soviet era, water resources management of the basin was contingent upon the policy that the USSR was implementing at the time. In the 1960s and 1970s, surface water quality standards for a broad spectrum of substances were established. Domestic sewage was required to enter wastewater treatment facilities and undergo both mechanical and biological treatment. Meanwhile, no standards, guidelines or management practices existed for controlling diffused source pollution. Until 1991, there were no taxes on water pollution. Only water use fees were employed, introduced in 1982. In essence, they served more to finance state water protection programmes rather than to give an incentive to water users to conserve a resource. Legal requirements, existing laws, regulations and standards were frequently ignored or violated, because of their strictness and unfeasibility (UNEP, 2002). In the Soviet period the USSR signed an agreement with Turkey concerning the use of the Araks River, according to which the water of this transboundary river is divided equally between the countries. According to another agreement signed between the USSR and the Islamic Republic of Iran, the water of the Araks River is divided equally between them.
When Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia became independent states, the three countries had neither water resources management regulations nor water codes. However, each country has adopted water codes within the last 15 years: Armenia in 1992 and revised in 2002 according to the European Union Water Framework Directives (EU-WFD), and Georgia and Azerbaijan in 1997. Nevertheless, there is no uniform control or management system for the rivers and, in the post-Soviet period, no water quality monitoring by the riparian countries. While the three countries are willing to cooperate on water-related issues since they recognize their dependency on the basin, whose waters they must share, they have not resolved their political, economic, and social issues. Currently no water treaties exist among the three countries, a condition directly related to the difficult political situation in the region.
In 1997, an agreement on environmental protection was signed between the governments of Georgia and Azerbaijan. In 1998, a similar agreement was signed between Georgia and Armenia. According to both agreements, the governments will cooperate in creating specifically protected areas within the transboundary ecosystems.
Azerbaijan and the Islamic Republic of Iran have an agreement on the protection of the Araks River (UNECE, 2004).
In 2002, the Republic of Armenia Commission on Transboundary Water Resources was established, chaired by the Head of the Water Resources Management Agency. This commission, together with corresponding commissions of neighbouring countries, deals with issues related to transboundary water resources use and protection.
Table 3 shows the main historical events in the Kura–Araks River Basin.
Berrin, B and Campana, M. 2008. Conflict, cooperation, and the new ‘Great Game’ in the Kura-Araks basin of the South Caucasus
Bucks, D.A. 1993. Micro-irrigation world wide usage report.
CIA (United States Central Intelligence Agency). 2004. Factbook, country profiles: Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia.
CILSS (Interstate Committee for Drought Control in the Sahel) / OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 1991. The development of irrigated crops in Sahel. Summary and reports by country. OECD / CILSS / CLUB of Sahel. Saturday / D (91) 366. E/F.
Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. 2007. Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. London: Earthscan, and Colombo: International Water Management Institute.
Ewing, A. 2003. Water quality and public health monitoring of surface waters in the Kura-Araks river basin of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia.
FAO. 1995. Irrigation in Africa/L’irrigation en Afrique en chiffres. FAO Water Report No. 7. Rome.
FAO. 1997a. Irrigation in the Near East Region in figures. FAO Water Report No. 9. Rome.
FAO. 1997b. Irrigation in the countries of the former Soviet Union in figures. FAO Water Report No. 15. Rome.
FAO. 1997c. Irrigation potential in Africa - a basin approach. FAO Land and Water Bulletin No. 4. Rome.
FAO. 1999. Irrigation in Asia in figures. FAO Water Report No. 18. Rome.
FAO. 2003. Review of world water resources by country. FAO Water Report No. 23. Rome.
FAO. 2004a. Directions for agricultural water management in Africa. FAO Land and Water Development Division. Internal document, unpublished.
FAO. 2004b. Support to the drafting of a national Water Resources Master Plan.
FAO. 2005. Irrigation in Africa in figures – AQUASTAT survey 2005. FAO Water Report No. 29. Rome.
FAO. 2008a. FAOSTAT – database. Available at http://faostat.fao.org/.
FAO. 2008b. AQUASTAT – database. Available at http://www.fao.org/nr/aquastat/.
Gleick, P.H., ed. 1993. Water in crisis: a guide to the of world’s freshwater resources. New York, USA, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press for Pacific Institute. 473 pp.
Gleick, P.H., ed. 2006. The world’s water 2006-2007: the biennial report on freshwater resources. Washington, DC, Island Press.
ICID (International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage). 2005. Sprinkler and micro-irrigated area in some ICID member countries. Available at http://www.icid.org.
IPTRID (International Programme for Technology and Research in Irrigation and Drainage) /FAO. 2003. The irrigation challenge - increasing irrigation contribution to food security through higher water productivity canal irrigation systems. Issue paper No. 4.
Lehner, B., Verdin, K., Jarvis, A. 2008. New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos, Transactions, AGU, 89(10): 93-94. HydroSHEDS. Available at the following link: http://www.worldwildlife.org/hydrosheds and http://hydrosheds.cr.usgs.gov.
Lowi, M. After 1996. Political and institutional responses to transboundary water disputes in the Middle East.
L'vovitch, M.I. 1974. World water resources and their future. Russian ed. Mysl. Moscow. Translation in English by R.L. Nace, American Geological Union, Washington, 1979. 415 pp.
Milich, L and Varady, G. 1998. Openness, sustainability, and public participation in transboundary river-basin institutions. The Israel-Jordan Joint Water Committee (IJJWC)
Möllenkamp S. 2003. Transboundary river basin management - new challenges in EU 25 and beyond.
NIC (National Intelligence Council). 2000. Central Asia and South Caucasus: Reorientations, international transitions, and strategic dynamics conference report. October 2000.
New, M., Lister, D., Hulme, M. and Makin, I. 2002. A high-resolution data set of surface climate over global land areas. Climate Research 2. Available at following link: http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg.htm.
Newton, J. 2007. Case study of transboundary dispute resolution: the Kura -Araks basin.
OSU. 2008. South Caucasus river monitoring project.
Ruzgar. Problem of Kura-Araks..
Sofer A., Rosovesky M. and Copaken N. 1999. Rivers of fire: the conflict over water in the Middle East.
>SPC (State Planning Commission). 2009. The five year plan 2006-2010.
UN (United Nations). 2006. The UN World Water Development Report II: Water, a shared responsibility. UNESCO / Berghahn Books.
UNDG (United Nations Development Group). 2005. The national water master plan – Phase 1 Water Resources Assessment. 26 pp.
UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2008. Human Development Index. Available at http://hdr.undp.org).
UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe). 2004. Environmental performance reviews: Azerbaijan.
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2002. Caucasus Environment Outlook (CEO)
UNEP. 2003. GEO Year Book 2003. Theme: Freshwater.
UNESCO-IHE (Institute for water education). 2002. From conflict to cooperation in international water resources management: challenges and opportunities. Institute for Water Education Delft, The Netherlands.
UNICEF (United Nations Children's Fund). 2005. Statistics by country. Available at http://www.unicef.org
UNICEF / WHO (World Health Organization). 2008. Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for water and sanitation. Available at http://www.wssinfo.org.
USAID (United States Agency for International Development). 2006. South Caucasus water program.
Vener, B. 2006. The Kura-Araks Basin: obstacles and common objectives for an integrated water resources management model among Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia.
Waterwiki. 2007. Reducing transboundary degradation in the Kura/Aras river basin.
WHYMAP (World-wide hydrogeological mapping and assessment programme). 2008. Groundwater resources of the world.
WHO (World Health Organization). 2005. World malaria report 2005.
World Bank. 1998. International watercourses: enhancing cooperation and managing conflict.
World Bank. 2007. Making the most of scarcity.
World Bank. 2008. Indicators of world development.
World Resources Institute. 1994. World resources 1994-1995. A guide to the global environment. Oxford University Press for WRI/UNEP/UNDP. 400 pp.
World Resources Institute. 2003. World resources 2002-2004. Decisions for the earth: balance, voice, and power.
^ haut de page ^
|Citer comme suit: FAO. 2016. Site web AQUASTAT. Organisation des Nations Unies pour l'alimentation et l'agriculture. Site consulté le [aaaa/mm/jj].|
|© FAO, 2016Questions ou commentaires? firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Votre accès à AQUASTAT et l’utilisation de toute information ou donnée est soumis aux termes et conditions spécifiés dans le User Agreement.|