Diane Le Hénaff

Diane Le Hénaff

Organización INRA
Organization type Research Institution
País France
Information Management Project Officer & Team Leader at INRA, the National French Institute for Agricultural Research. Missions: • 2011-2014: Organic Lingua (CIP-ICT-PSP-2009-4 funded by the European commission) - Coordinator of the WP6 WP6: Extending Content Coverage. It deals with all the necessary activities to organise and coordinate the connection and population of new content repositories to the Organic.Edunet federation, taking advantage of the multilingual tools and components. • 2010-2013: VOA3R (CIP-ICT-PSP.2009.2.4 funded by the EU commission) In charge of the Dissemination & Awarness Plan (WP7) & INRA content delivery (WP5) VOA3R focuses on the creation of a virtual repository of open access agricultural research which will be provided through an innovative community-oriented platform • 2008-2010: ProdInra 2, new INRA open archive version - Project Manager Developping new services to respond to different users’ needs & implementing standards & semantic technology. • 2008-present: Management of 6 people • 2008-present: Responsability of the INRA Open Archive • 2009-present: Coordination of the Open Access INRA Network • octobre 2005 – décembre 2006: Lecturer in Scientific Information Master Other activities: • 2011 to present: Member of the CIEPI executive board • 2003-2009: Member of the ADBS executive board • Since 2005: Coordinator of the research ADBS network

This member participated in the following Forums

Foro Forum: "Building the CIARD Framework for Data and Information Sharing" April, 2011

Question 3: What are the emerging tools, standards and infrastructures?

Subido por Diane Le Hénaff el Mar, 12/04/2011 - 15:26

There is a -just started - national (French) project about building a Scientific Digital Library Infrastructure that will not only focus on archiving publications.

I am involved in some of the working groups and LOD is being considered as a relevant technology.

I would have liked to go beyond geographical barriers as I think that thematic networks and infrastructures are more relevant than countries. Then it is more a funding issue...

Subido por Diane Le Hénaff el Lun, 11/04/2011 - 13:52

Thank you a lot for all these interesting references. I received a draft version of the recommendations mentionned in 4) and I can say it is very useful.

Diane

Subido por Diane Le Hénaff el Lun, 11/04/2011 - 13:49

CIARD RING as well as this forum is really interesting to identify tools, infrastructures. It gives the opportunity for partnerships.

Question 2: What are the prospects for interoperability in the future?

Subido por Diane Le Hénaff el Lun, 11/04/2011 - 13:45

I like very much the concept of people - communication - technology. In my case, as head of the open access network in my organisation INRA, I can act toward people and make everything possible to communicate.

The Information System Division in the curl

But even if I am aware of what LOD can bring to data dissemination, I have to work with the Information System Division in all institutional projects. They have different purposes.  They choose the technology : SQL database at first, then XML ones. They don't want to investigate in RDF. A group of information managers inside INRA are working on semantic projects to demonstrate the ability to use this technology and to achieve scientific goals. It is the only way to convince the IS division to go further with RDF and LOD...

Question of skill

It is not easy in France to find computer scientist - RDF skilled - to work with. Most of them have never heard about OAI-PMH. OAI is much easier than RDF to learn. Even companies that provide computer services are not yet ready with RDF development. I would be interested in knowing the situation in other countries as well as potential subcontractors !

Diane

Question 1: What are we sharing and what needs to be shared?

Subido por Diane Le Hénaff el Mar, 05/04/2011 - 10:31

For the last decades, we have set up centralized systems based on open access publications. As Johannes said, the technology is available now to be able to share data from a cloud organised-systems. What is now expected is to share datasets, raw data. We are now dealing with e-science and not only with publications in an OAI-PMH repository.

As I said above, we have to deal with the fear of sharing datasets. Scientists would like to receive (Johannes's dream ;-) but they don't want to share! Information managers, senior scientists, managers have to advocate with this cultural barrier. The issue of assessment and competition have to be addressed internationally.

If the technology to share is available, storage capacity and maintenance problems may occur. That makes the cloud more relevant.

To end this contribution, I would like to talk about what have to be shared. Not only datasets. What seems to me being important is to add information on how these datasets were produced (including the protocol used). In the case of agriculture, PH of the soil, its composition etc. have to be mentioned with the rawdata to enable the reusability and interpretations.

Therefore,to deposit the datasets could take time for scientits if that kind of information is required. And information managers can't help -as they do for publications - as the researcher is the only one that knows about the protocol used, the PH, composition of the soil...Time consuming is often the argument of the researchers for non-deposition.

Sharing information is not a technical problem but an international cultural one (competition, time for research, assessment).

Diane Le Hénaff, INRA

Subido por Diane Le Hénaff el Mar, 05/04/2011 - 10:04

That is a pretty important issue. In my organisation INRA (France), we are looking forward to storing and sharing datasets from our researchers. The aim is for an internal reuse. We have to deal with the fear of sharing datasets to the large community. Scientists are afraid of competition because of assessment. They don't want to share but they want to receive. It is a cultural issue.

Diane

Subido por Diane Le Hénaff el Lun, 04/04/2011 - 15:26

Dear Simon,

You've done the first step by exposing the production in DC via an OAI module on the CMS. But it doesn't make the data being "open". It is the step of dissemination ...

I think the second step should go further with:

-> data and not only publications.

-> standardization using model & format that allow information sharing and reusability

It is not easy, especcially because current applications are based on relational databases, specific model & format. The database you presented is an example.

How ?

-> about data: we should integrate publications with projects, organisation, social network, researchers, raw data ...

See the CERIF model: http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/CERIF2008/CERIF2008_1.1_XML…

See the VOA3R project that aims at integrating social network with open access publications...: http://voa3r.eu

-> by producing data under LOD (Linked Open Data)

AIMS is working on an excellent handbook called LODE Recommendations
Report on how to produce Linked Open Data (LOD)-enabled bibliographical data

It is very strategic to be able to share and reuse....

With kind regards,

Diane Le Hénaff, INRA

Hazte miembro

Como miembro del Foro e-Agriculture puedes contribuir a las discusiones en curso, recibir actualizaciones regulares por correo electrónico y explorar los perfiles de otros miembros.