Руководство лесным хозяйством
Basic knowledge
What is forest governance?
In general terms, governance refers to the formal and informal rules, organizations and processes through which public and private actors articulate their interests and make and implement decisions. Forest governance is defined as the way in which public and private actors, including formal and informal institutions, smallholder and indigenous organizations, small, medium-sized and large enterprises, civil-society organizations and other stakeholders negotiate, make and enforce binding decisions about the management, use and conservation of forest resources. The concept of forest governance has evolved to engage multiple (public and private) actors at multiple scales, from local to global. It may include:
- rules about how forests should be governed, governmental regulations about who benefits from forest resources, and traditional and customary rights;
- the use of private-sector mechanisms such as voluntary certification to support SFM and legal timber supply; and
- international measures to support timber legality and promote good governance, such as the European Union’s Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Action Plan and payment schemes for environmental services, such as REDD+(insert here hyperlink to REDD+ module).
Effective forest governance processes engage forest stakeholders, address key forest-related issues, and involve other sectors that affect, or are affected by, forest governance.
Among them, women in particular must be taken into account, as they are one of the main groups using forests. It is essential that women be involved in these processes because rural women’s dependence on forests is different from, and often greater than, men’s due to the gender division of labour and different access to economic resources.
Связанные модули
Управление лесным хозяйством способствует достижению ЦУР:
The debate around forest governance has increasingly considered gender, but there is little documented evidence of an actual increase in women participating in the process. In high-level national and international discussions and positions, women are still underrepresented. In community-based approaches, especially in South Asia, the bodies governing and setting the rules for accessing and managing forests, such as a general assembly and executive committee, were so-called “gender neutral”. But women’s participation was restricted because of conservative gender norms. Even when women participate, they often have only a passive or consultative role, which allows them only to exchange opinions that have no guarantee of influencing decisions.
The study on Gender analysis promoted by the UN-REDD Viet Nam Programme reports that women employed in government offices are often assigned to tasks considered “suitable” for them because they do not demand a high-level of expertise. It appears fundamental to empower women so they can have an active role and be in a position to influence decisions and take initiatives as there is also a tendency to report on the number of female staff without much attention to the importance of strengthening their skills and capacity, especially in remote areas and within ethnic minorities. The study reports that there is no plan to train or promote existing female staff to leadership positions. To break this pattern and to promote women’s positions within forestry institutions, the study recommends targeting men for awareness-raising on the benefits of women’s involvement.
Gender equality in the workplace is perceived as being a women’s issue. Women’s organizations, such as the Women’s Union, are promoting gender mainstreaming in Viet Nam. “Gender workshops” gather women only, and gender action plans do not mention men. The study recommends training for women, too, in understanding that men must be made part of the effort. Country supported gender analyses like these offer useful insight into the gender inequalities that need to be addressed.
Creating networks, cooperatives or women-only organizations are first steps toward building momentum and pushing women leaders to participate in decisive governance processes and toward allowing women’s perspectives to be heard.
In more depth
Pillars and principles of forest governance
The Framework for Assessing and Monitoring Forest Governance is premised on the idea that a widely accepted, comprehensive analytical framework can facilitate efforts within and among countries to improve forest governance. The three core pillars established in the framework are: 1) policy, legal/regulatory and institutional frameworks; 2) planning and decision-making processes; and 3) implementation, enforcement and compliance.
The framework identifies the following six principles that cut across the three pillars (see figure) and address the quality of governance:
- Accountability – people and institutions should be accountable for their actions.
- Effectiveness – governance mechanisms should achieve the ends they are intended to achieve.
- Efficiency – governance should work with a minimum of resources.
- Fairness/equity – the benefits and burdens of a forest resource should fall in a way generally viewed as just.
- Participation – all interested people should have an opportunity to be consulted or to participate in key decisions affecting forests.
- Transparency – information about forests and how they are governed should be reasonably available to all.
Each of the three pillars is discussed in more detail below, and guidance on the role of forest managers is provided.