La evaluación en la FAO

Destacados

05/06/2023

Certain areas of recognized FAO technical expertise, such as water for agriculture or anti-microbial resistance deserve higher prioritization and strategic integration.

29/05/2023
Sound and timely statistics are key to inform decisions, policies and investments that tackle issues related to food and agriculture, from hunger and malnutrition to rural poverty, from food systems productivity to the sustainable use of natural resources or to climate change.
25/05/2023
Evaluations reinforce the value of data, technology, and innovations in support of FAO’s work, highlighting the need for larger investments in this space.
22/05/2023
Biodiveristy provides us with food, water, shelter, and medicine. It also helps to regulate the climate and keep our ecosystems healthy. What have we learnt from FAO project evaluations?
Woman watering plants
09/05/2023

Unearmarked or lightly earmarked voluntary contributions remain critical to finance innovation and underfunded and emerging areas in FAO.

Yemen
15/03/2023

The evaluation of FAO’s contribution to SDG 6 analyzed FAO’s activities and projects to determine FAO’s work in relation to SDG 6 targets.

13/03/2023

EvalForward es una comunidad de práctica sobre evaluación para la seguridad alimentaria, la agricultura y el desarrollo rural. Reúne a funcionarios y profesionales para intercambiar experiencias y fortalecer las capacidades de evaluación a nivel nacional.

01/03/2023
Food security and conflict are two interconnected issues that have a significant impact on the well-being of individuals and communities worldwide.
FAO_24758_0342
22/02/2023
The IPC provides a common language and framework for governments and other stakeholders to understand and respond to food insecurity and malnutrition.
08/11/2022

COP26 showed how the global response continues to struggle to meet its commitments and keep pace with escalating climate threats. At the same time, there are also shortcomings in evidence of and reporting on commitments, undermining the credibility of the COP process. This is where evaluation needs to play a far greater role and help to place evaluative evidence firmly in the picture.