Moses Owiny
| Organización | Women of Uganda Network (WOUGNET) |
|---|---|
| Organization type | Civil Society Organization/NGO |
| País | Uganda |
--
Moses Owiny
Program Manager - Information Sharing and Networking r
Women Of Uganda Network (WOUGNET)
Plot 55, Keneth Dale Rd, Kamwokya, Kampala Uganda
Telephone: 0414-532035
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.wougnet.org
Skype: moses.owiny
This member participated in the following Forums
Foro Communication for Development, community media and ICTs for family farming and rural development
Question 1 (opens 22 September)
Thanks Micheal for asking. From my experience and understanding, an information center that is not only restricted to offering a particluar kind of service e.g. training but going beyond to provide various services as well serving as platform for exchanges, sharing of information and knowledge generation would be multi designed. In our case, this center was doing ICT training, it was serving as a resource hub for communities to find useful information, it was well equiped with more than agricultural resources but health, education, and gender for instance. This center furthure provided opportunities where questions and answer - especially on agricultural related issues could be answered on spot whenever farmers would get to the place. It was a good intermedieary in faciliating flow and exchange of information as well as success of the project. In fact, up to now the center is more diversified with resources of all kinds and accessible to anyone within reach.
As for its relevance, this is why i believe no single ICT approach is sufficient in effectively solving agricultural as well as other rural development needs of farmers and hence the need to employ a collaborative approach - using multiple ICT mediums combined with other offline form of interactions.
Rural women farmers are more inclined to actively participate in community media programs when they are involved and hence feel part of the programming or part of such intervention. Using a combination of both traditional and modern ICT tools combined with offline mediums example, face to face interactions and meetings, listening clubs and radio discussions at community levels etc. are crucial towards the success of community media delivering quality and authenticated information to rural women family farmers. The effective use of multi- dimensional information centers with access to farming/agricultural resources, ICTs, and extension advises for farmers are crucial in this aspect. Women of Uganda Network (WOUGNET) in partnership with Community Radios - especially Radio Apac in Northern Uganda has a very long and sustained experience on how innovative modern and traditional ICT tools combined with offline mediums makes communication effective and beneficial to rural women farmers - with convergence of a multi-dimensional information center serving as a one stop center for ICT initiatives targeting rural family farmers.
Moses,
WOUGNET
Question 2 (opens 24 September)
First of all, there is need for training of farmers to understand, appreciate as well as use and apply skills that they have learned. Since 2005, WOUGNET partnered with community radios in delivering agricultural information to rural family farmers. The project employed a mixed but collaborative approach and employed different ICT tools as no single ICT tool can be used in isolation for such community project. Training on radio presentations skills empowered women with confidence to appear on radio talkshows and share agricultural experiences alongside agricultural experts, two way use of mobile phones in delivering SMS messages to farmers and recieving feedback or concerns were also done. Weekly agricultural talkshows ensured that farmers were prepared and the timing of the talkshows were suggested by farmers themselves to fit within their multiple household roles.
Women farmers would gather together in groups of 30 in 12 sub counties and would actively listen, ask questions and contribute to radio agricultural talkshows. Audio tapes were produced and given to farmers. Partnerships with agricultural extension workers and agricultural institutions ensured farmers were well attended to at community level. This was complemented with offline mediums. Project staff met on a consistent basis with farmers, asking and responding to their farming questions. While most of the farming groups had access to a radio cassette and a mobile phone, by 2010, this was only limited to group chairpersons but members could for instance borrow the phones and use them as agreed upon by members.
The set up of a multi- dimensional information center in Northern Uganda called the Kubere Information Center (KIC) www.kic.wougnet.org - provided opportunity for women farmers within the location of the center to access it on a consistent basis, however - more males appeared to come to the center than females showing the gender dimension to access to information by rural female farmers.
The use of both traditional and modern ICT tools combined with face to face interactions/ meetings ensured success of the project. Consequently by 2010, the farmers had reported increased production of farm outputs and then the challenge to get market was the next issue to deal with.
Therefore, there were several lessons learned from this project which i can not enumerate but there are certainly links to online resources in which experiences about this project was shared and which i can make it available in case any one needs it.
Moses
Foro Forum: "ICT for Data Collection, Monitoring and Evaluation" June, 2012
Question 1: ICTs for collecting agricultural, socio-economic, or M&E data (Open 11 June)
Apart from the text Messaging Systems which may be a little bit less costly and appropriate for rural communities for data collection,what other cheaper tools are their for organisations wanting to capture data from the field in rural communities. I have seen many posts about the Ipods, Iphones and ODK systems etc, how cheap and relevant are these tools and what kind of data do they capture anyway?.
I still have not adequately understood what appropriate tools are used to capture data in remote locations,how and what kind of data. Somebody should help me reply to this post.
Moses
Women of Uganda Network
Foro Forum: "Challenges and Opportunities for Capturing Impact in ICT initiatives in Agriculture" September, 2011
Do you carry out regular monitoring during projects, or do you prefer ex post facto studies?
Dear all, the discussions are really very interesting.I assumed that as part of the Project Management Cycle,mid-term and terminal evaluations are supposed to be carried out as part of monitoring exercise to generate feed back during project implementation & inform future progress and programming and strategies during the course.My question is, how relevant are these evaluations for short term projects?.Is it possible to develop and set SMART indicators as a basis for ex-post evaluation and we leave out these kinds of "process" evaluations?.I do feel that the mid-term and terminal evaluations are not necessay since the project could already be having good data from its ex-ante-evaluation/findings to provide a strong basis for monitoring and evaluation of the intervention comprehensively.
I also forsee alot of funds being used in the process of evaluation in the PMC instead of funds being channeled towards real interventions which are expected to generate impact and good outcomes to the community.
Thanks,
Moses Owiny
WOUGNET,currently in Batavia, NY
Introduction and Question 1
Using logframes is one model.But i think relying on a logframe to develop an evaluation system is dangerous as in most cases logframes are designed at an early stage of planning of the project and also the logframes are rarely updated during course of project implementation and so it may not necessarily reflect real situations at the time of evaluation.
Developing a good Monitoring and evaluation systems to track progress, performance and to generate good outcomes following and impact assessment is good way to go.Also as part of Monitoring and evaluation, selecting indicators to measure progress and determine outcomes must be critically done.I work with an ICT based Organisation in Uganda called Women of Uganda Network (WOUGNET) and we implement ICT4Dev initiatives and would really be interested in understudying what OUR external evaluators will use to really help us comprehensively measure the impact of our ICT4Dev initiative in the near future !
Moses