E-Agriculture

Question 1: What are we sharing and what needs to be shared?

Question 1: What are we sharing and what needs to be shared?

The landscape of information and data flows and repositories is multifaceted. Peer reviewed journals and scientific conferences are still the basis of scholarly communication, but science blogs and social community platforms become increasingly important. Research data are now increasingly managed using advanced technologies and sharing of raw data has become an important issue. 

This topic thread will address and discuss details about the types of information that need to be shared in our domain, e.g.:

  Information residing in communications between individuals, such as in blogs and
community platforms supported by sources such as directories of people and
institutions;

  Formal scientific data collections as published data sets and their associated
metadata and quality indicators, peer-reviewed scholarly journals or document
repositories;

  Knowledge „derivatives‟ such as collections of descriptions of agricultural
technologies, learning object repositories, expertise databases, etc.; And surely more...

Schema of data repositories and flows in agricultural research and extension. Data flows

There are several interesting examples of successful data exchange between distributed datasets, and some of them in the area of agricultural research and innovation. There are also ambitious attempts that still have to live up to expectations. A common characteristic of most examples is that they are based on specific ad-hoc solutions more than on a general principle or architecture, thus requiring  coordination between  "tightly coupled"  components and limiting the possibilities of re-using the datasets anywhere and  of replicating the experiment.

In some  areas there are global platforms for sharing and interoperability. Some of these address the need to access scholarly publications, mostly those organized by the publishers, and others address the interfacing of open archives. With regard to standards and services in support of interoperability, there are several very successful initiatives, each dealing with different data domains. Among document repositories, the most successful initiative is surely the Open Archives Initiative (OAI) Protocol for Metadata Harvesting used by a global network of open archives. The strength of this movement is changing the face of scholarly publishing.  Geospatial and remote sensing data have strong communities that have developed a number of wildly successful standards such as OGC that have in turn spurred important open source projects such as GeoServer. Finally, in relation to  statistics  from surveys, censuses and time-series, there has been considerable global cooperation among international organizations leading to initiatives such as SDMX and DDI, embraced by the World Bank, IMF, UNSD, OECD and others.

Singer  System1, GeoNetwork2, and GeneOntology Consortium3 are examples of successful initiatives to create mechanisms for data exchange within scientific communities. The SDMX4 initiative aims to create a global exchange standard for statistical data.

There are more examples, but these advanced systems cannot have a strong impact on the average (smaller, less capacitated) agricultural information systems, because  overall there are no easy mechanisms and tools for information systems developers to access, collect and mash up data from distributed sources. An infrastructure of standards, web sevices and tools needs to be created.

 


1 Singer System http://singer.cgiar.org/ Last accessed March 2011
2 GeoNetwork
http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/main.home Last accessed March 2011
3 GeneOntology Consortium
http://www.geneontology.org/ Last accessed March 2011
4 SDMX
http://sdmx.org/ Last accessed March 201

Elizabeth Dodsworth
Elizabeth DodsworthCABIUnited Kingdom
Sharing, indexing and archiving raw datasets are becoming increasingly important as organisations realise that much of the information they generate can rapidly disappear.  Research work and projects often result in the creation of huge volumes of data but when the project finishes, the researcher moves on or the technology changes so those datasets can evaporate.  The retention of large scale datasets is crucial to the future of the understanding and manipulation of agricultural practices and outputs as data can be reanalysed many times, often for purposes that they were not originally collected for.  Yet the costs, sensitivities and technologies of such work cannot be underestimated.  The new Plantwise Initiative, which CABI is leading, to increase food sustainability by reducing crop losses, is trying to overcome these issues in order to be able to collate, repurpose and link global data and create a central Knowledge Bank of information on the world’s crop pests. The Knowledge Bank will be open to all from mid year 2011.

My name is Nodumo Dhlamini based in Kampala, Uganda. I represent RUFORUM. We are implementing a regional MSc AICM (Agricultural Information and Communication Management) program at Egerton University (Kenya), University of Nairobi (Kenya) and Haramaya University (Ethiopia). The emerging lessons from this academic program are that there is a great need for it, there is a need to support more practitioners to go through the program (either the whole MSc or particular modules), there is a need to provide this program as an online program, there is a need to link the graduates of this program to solve real challenges faced by Africa in the area of AICM. Agricultural professionals, faculties, researchers and other practitioners in Africa are still lagging behind when it comes to effectively sharing agricultural information and knowledge.

Agricultural academic and research institutions are sharing: Research abstracts; Research theses; Teaching Content; Agricultural technologies/innovations; Calls for proposals/grants; collaboration and networking opportunities; On social networking sites more and more are sharing experiences, conducting surveys related to agriculture, etc

The following needs to be shared:

  • Simplified research outputs/technologies/innovations for the benefit of the farmers. These could also be translated to local languages.

  • Synthesized lessons on implementing agricultural technologies – these could be written as stories that farmers can connect to.

 

Elizabeth Dodsworth
Elizabeth DodsworthCABIUnited Kingdom
What needs to be shared? CABI is an intergovernmental agency and regularly gets feedback from its member countries – many are classed as developing countries. From these countries we know there is a considerable amount of ‘hidden knowledge’, see Hugo’s earlier post. The knowledge ‘exists’ but is not digital and so in this modern world is not discoverable. To test whether this hidden knowledge is useful CABI initiated a small pilot in three countries, Malawi, Philippines, and Pakistan. We identified what documents were important, digitised and out into a readymade CABI database platform and made it open access. See www.cabi.org/gara. What we have seen is that this knowledge in these documents has been accessed throughout the world. The database is registered on the CIARD ring. What are we seeing? These three countries use the database and they are in the top 10 users (Google Analytics), additionally this knowledge is also being consumed in north and the rest of the world. So at a very basic level there is not equitable sharing and dissemination of ‘traditional’ scientific communication in the era of the web. There is still a long way to bring agricultural research for development agencies as full participants of the digital knowledge sharing environment.
Oh! I am bit late to share my ideas. We are sharing our published information via websites, contribution to international databases and sharing ideas via agro forum. My organization website http://www.parc.gov.pk not only contains information about its activities but it also gives access to some locally developed databases and information for farmers. Information about institutions and experts are also shared. Problem is not that someone does not want to share the information but difficulties are in organizing and managing information to give it some format for sharing.
 
There is serious gap of resources available for getting information about on-going agricultural research activities in my country. We are trying to address this issue. There is also need of conversion of research results in to public information for farmers and farmers are not getting full benefits from research going on in the country. One concept I would like to add in the discussion is that scientists/researchers are only sharing their achievements and outputs mostly via publishing research papers/articles but there is need that they must also share their failures in research as every research could not be ended on successful results.
 
Shahnaz Zuberi
Director (Sci. Information)
National Agricultural Research Centre
Islamabad, Pakistan
 
 
 
Cui yunpeng
Cui yunpengChinese Academy of Agriculture ScienceChina

There is an Interactive knowledge Q&A System in www.baidu.com in China. I appreciate the idel of the system, and I think if we can build a platform like this in agriculture knowledge sharing area, it's must be effective.

In the platform, everyone can write their question, and everyone can answer any question put forward by other people.

The problem is, how can we manage or organize the questions and the answers, I think, in fact, the answer of a question is a explicit result of the tacit knowledge in one's mind, or at least, the information processed by someone.

So, if we can manage the system and the resources effectively, such as set rules to encourage  visitors, experts etc., to answer the questions, use ontology to manage the resources and organize the contents inside the database of the system, and so on.

It's just a preliminary idea. and I want to listen other's opinions, thanks a lot.

Cui yunpeng
Cui yunpengChinese Academy of Agriculture ScienceChina

There is an Interactive knowledge Q&A System in www.baidu.com in China. I appreciate the idel of the system, and I think if we can build a platform like this in agriculture knowledge sharing area, it's must be effective.

In the platform, everyone can write their question, and everyone can answer any question put forward by other people.

The problem is, how can we manage or organize the questions and the answers, I think, in fact, the answer of a question is a explicit result of the tacit knowledge in one's mind, or at least, the information processed by someone.

So, if we can manage the system and the resources effectively, such as set rules to encourage  visitors, experts etc., to answer the questions, use ontology to manage the resources and organize the contents inside the database of the system, and so on.

It's just a preliminary idea. and I want to listen other's opinions, thanks a lot.