Консультации

Selection and Prioritization of CFS Activities for the Biennium 2016-2017

CFS has started a process of selection and prioritization of activities for the biennium 2016-2017. Though this online discussion, the CFS Secretariat  would like to invite all those interested to provide inputs to this process.

Background

The Committee on World Food Security (CFS) is the foremost, inclusive platform for food security and nutrition issues. Given the importance of its role there is wide range of potential activities that CFS could undertake.  At its 40th Plenary Session in October 2013, the Committee put in place a structured and inclusive two-year process to decide on its upcoming program of work and to select and prioritize future  activities.

The prioritization process of CFS activities is based on the following five criteria:

  1. The consideration of the mandate of CFS and what the added value of the work item is;
  2. The contribution of the activities to the overall objective of CFS; (see annex 1)
  3. There should be no duplication of past activities or current ones being carried out by other actors with comparable mandates;
  4. The resources available should be taken into account;
  5. There should be consensus among CFS stakeholders.

The process should result in the following outputs regarding CFS activities for the biennium 2016-2017:

  1. Major workstreams that are characterized by a broad-based and relatively long consultation and negotiation process on strategic topics recognized of major importance for food security and nutrition and lead to the finalization and endorsement of CFS key products;
  2. Other potential workstreams to be carried out by CFS, other than those that are already in place;
  3. Themes for future HLPE reports.

This process aims to help the Plenary in October 2015 take an informed decision on which issues to address and by which kind of activity.

For ease of reference, an extract from the CFS Multi-Year Programme of Work and Priorities (MYPoW) that was endorsed at CFS 40 in October 2014 and which includes the main activities to be carried out by the Committee in the biennium 2014-2015, can be found in Annex 2.

The Overall Process of Prioritization

After the multi-stakeholder dialogue in Bucharest on 31 March 2014 for the European region and given the impossibility to hold similar dialogues back to back with the other FAO Regional Conferences, the process will continue with an online consultation which will allow all CFS stakeholders to provide inputs to the process of selection of CFS activities for the biennium 2016-2017.

Following this online consultation, an Open-Ended Working Group meeting will be held on 30 June 2014 in Rome to discuss the outcomes, analyze the different activities proposed, merge and condense when possible and collect further inputs with a view to inform CFS 41

After CFS 41 in October 2014, the focus will move to the analysis of the proposals that were received and to their prioritization.

Internal consultative processes within the different CFS constituencies will take place to discuss and express preferences among the activities that have been proposed.

Two Open-Ended Working Group meetings will take place in the first half of 2015 with a view to finding consensus on the list of activities; the first to analyze and streamline the proposals put forward by CFS Constituencies and the second to present and discuss a prioritized list.  This list will be presented to CFS 42 in 2015 when the final decision on the proposed activities for 2016-2017 will be taken.

The Online Consultation

We would like to invite you to  respond to the following questions:

  1. What issues should be addressed by the Committee in the biennium 2016-2017?
  2. Explain the issue and describe why you are proposing it;
  3. What kind of activity do you propose to address this issue? Which kind of CFS workstream should be put in place to address it?
  1. A major workstream
  2. Another type of workstream
  3. An HLPE report

Luca Fratini

Chair of the Open-Ended Working Group on MYPoW

В настоящее время это мероприятие закрыто. Пожалуйста, свяжитесь с [email protected] для получения любой дополнительной информации.

* Нажмите на имя, чтобы ознакомиться с комментариями, оставленными участником, и свяжитесь с ним / ней напрямую
  • Прочитано 57 комментарии
  • Развернуть все

I would like to see two issues investigated and analyzed carefully:

1) Food security and nutrition through agroecology.  This would ideally begin with a HLPE report on agroecology.

2) Rights-based monitoring of food security and nutrition.  Again, this could begin with a HLPE report reviewing the existing rights-based monitoring systems that are in place;  but it should fall within the purview of the OEWG on Monitoring.

Проф. George Kent

Department of Political Science, University of Hawai'i
Соединенные Штаты Америки

In the attached essay I call on the CFS to give attention to the food security of infants and young children, with a view to establishing new global regulations for processed baby foods and other measures.

The document is also available at

http://www2.hawaii.edu/~kent/FOODSECURITYOFINFANTS.docx

Aloha, George Kent

 

  1. What issues should be addressed by the Committee in the biennium 2016-2017?

Marginalization of women from policy making processes is an important area that needs to be addressed by investing on women farmers' leadership building. At the same time, in developing countries like Nepal, the public agencies yet not being satisfactorily accountable to respond to the gender gaps in food security and nutritional issues. Supply of good seeds, fertilizer, and related agricultural inputs by the service providers/duty bearers has been irregular and untimely. However where there is regular irrigation services, women oriented extension services and genuine locally managed private companies such as, agro vets , women feel less loaded and more motivated towards commercialized agriculture through crop diversification and market networking. Appropriate technology such as, integrated pest management, farmers field school, etc. have been rewarding to help women make better benefits encouraging their maximum contribution. In the coming years, more attention needed to be given towards

  • leadership building of women farmers
  • innovate time saving and labor saving technology for farmers,
  • linking to private sector services, such as, mobile banking to encourage direct linkage between women and marketing
  • strengthening locally established private agro vets
  • strengthening women's cooperatives from where they can mobilize easy money for support agricultural production
  • Promote regional network of women farmers to enhance "informal learning banks" from successful cases of improved production and marketing practices
  • Promote "local women agriculturists" through informal training, extension education and certification based on proven cases rather than counting on formal education only
  1. Explain the issue and describe why you are proposing it;

Due to increasing male out migration, women farmers do suffer from increased workload and food insecurity due to leaving land fallow under the pressure of shortage of labor for agricultural work, increasing price of staple food items that they cannot afford, absence of appropriate market linkages and facilities for enabling the local farmers to market their production, women specifically suffer because most of them are inadequately informed about the available services and facilities and policies for extension services. In this context, building women's leadership in claiming services, inputs, technologies and benefits from agricultural duty bearers, they can manage food production and utilization effectively for nutrition and income.

  1. What kind of activity do you propose to address this issue? Which kind of CFS workstream should be put in place to address it?

Already answered under Q.1. Morever until and unless service provider organizations are made gender sensitive, efforts remain gender neutral or gender blind. Gender responsive budgeting and gender audit systems must be mainstreamed and carefully monitored by gender networks at country level along with mainstreaming status reports into overall CEDAW reporting and MDG reporting, which compel service providers to perform towards equitable service provisions. CFS workstream can be effective if they are more oriented towards ground level work, having good agricultural and nutritional qualification.

  1. A major workstream: gender balanced and field oriented , well qualified and more from local level extension workers
  2. Another type of workstream: Sociologists that can provide complementary assistance to the achievement of equitable impact
  3. An HLPE report

1. what issues should be addressed by the Committee in the biennium 2016-2017?

The concept "Food Security" is not well understood by many decision makers especially because in many languages the the term does not exist and/or it is confused with  the term "Food Safety". To ensure sectors working with "Food Security" routinely consider NUTRITION as a pre-requisite to ensure "Food Security" then instead of the terminology "Food Security" and "Nutrition" - these two should be merged and new terminology of "Food and Nutrition Security" addressed and recommended by CFS.

2. Explain why? (see attached for more information)

The term "food and nutrition security" reflects the multisector collaboration needed between those working with food security and nutrition and separate "silos".  This new term expresses an integrated resilience and development goals to help guide implementation of policy and costeffective programmatic action.

If Food and Nutrition Security are viewed through a POLICY COHERENT lens the related programmes will be more likely to achieve their goals including:

1. Policy Coherence for Resilience Development.

2. Nutrition Insecurity hinders Resilience and Development.

3. Role of Sustainable Agriculture and Food production is primarily to feed people biodiverse, nutritious foods aligned with dietary intake recommendations and environmental sustainablity.

4. Post-2015 Agenda presents renewed opportunity, based on robust evidence, how to better reduce stunted growth in both economic and human health terms.

5. Climated Change and Green Growth cannot be successfully addressed unless reduction of malnutrition is explicitly considered.

 

Dear all,

Firstly thank you to the CFS Secretariat for opening this important topic for discussion. The International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA) proposes that for the 2016-2017 biennium, the CFS builds up on the outcomes of the post-2015 agenda in order to foster policy coherence between the various agencies, and state and non-state actors in the private sector and civil society.

In particular we suggest that the CFS prioritizes the following topic that is imperative to rural development especially in the most impoverished regions of the world:

Women’s empowerment

Gender equality is important in agriculture as a vehicle towards food and nutrition security for all. More female policy and decision-makers are needed to represent and reflect the challenges faced by women farmers, especially smallholders in Sub-Saharan Africa who face a double yield gap: one with the developed world and the other with male farmers in their own communities. Female farmers require access to land, credit, and technology in order to achieve the basic human right of feeding their families.

According to the World Bank only 16.2% of ministerial-level positions are held by women worldwide, leaving women with little power at policy level. This has a huge impact on the ability of governments to supply all farmers with the necessary inputs and tools, as the needs and struggles of female farmers are not communicated at this level.

Last month the World Bank and advocacy group ONE released the report ‘Levelling the field: Improving opportunities for women farmers in Africa’. The report addresses the yield-gap between women and men in Africa. Despite the fact that Africa’s women farmers make up nearly half of the labour force in agriculture but on average produce less per hectare than men. Previous statistics from the UN Food and Agriculture’s (FAO) 2010-11 State of Food Insecurity in the World report revealed if women were given equal access to resources agriculture output would increase by2.5-4% in developing countries.

Lastly, both a HLPE report and/or a major workstream would be appropriate to address the issue of women empowerment both in the field and in the policy arena to promote food and nutrition security for all.

Thank you.

Resources:

http://www.worldbank.org/mdgs/gender.html

http://www.one.org/international/policy/levelling-the-field-improving-opportunities-for-women-farmers-in-africa/?source=blogIntUK132103182014

http://www.fao.org/publications/sofi/en/

Suggested issues to be addressed by CFS from 2016 on:

There is a belated urgency for CFS members to, once and for all, address and hopefully seek consensus on issues that have been chronically postponed as front-line issues.

Although the list is by no means complete, I refer to:

·      Seeking a greater balance in CFS for both a food AND a nutrition focus; the latter has, more often than not, received shortschrift.

·      The role, attention and funding that needs to be given to development centered on an agroecological approach (not forgetting fisheries).

·      The replacement of the concept of food security by the concept of food sovereignty.

·      A more coherent and aggressive strategy for CFS members to fight what amounts to a corporate take-over of agriculture, food and nutrition.

·      A complementary strategy to unmask bad PPPs and their inherent conflicts of interest.

·      The role of philanthrocapitalism in shaping policy and financing biased approaches to development.

·      The unresolved issues of food and nutrition governance.

The list above hardly needs to add an ‘explanation why I propose them here’. The evidence is scattered now all over and all of these issues have come up in the post-2015 discussions.

This brings me to another key issue for the CFS to address starting in 2016, i.e., the monitoring of food and nutrition commitments made in the post 2015 years.

Last but not least, let me point out two key issues: 

(i)            I contend that after 10 years of experience with the Voluntary Guidelines it is time to critique ‘voluntarianism’ and refocus our efforts on regulation and accountability. CFS ought to play a central role in this.

(ii)          CFS has done next to nothing proactively to advance approaching the food and nutrition problems from the human rights perspective. This cannot wait till 2016!

The challenge now is to peg activities to the ideas/issues here presented so they become part of the major workstream of CFS including recommendations to the HLPE. This is hardly the space to do this. I volunteer to be part of a group to embark in these discussions.

Claudio Schuftan, Ho hi Minh City

[email protected]

Santosh Kumar Mishra

Population Education Resource Centre, Department of Lifelong Learning and Extension
Индия

1. What issues should be addressed by the Committee in the biennium 2016-2017?

  • Women are the central drivers of change: Subsistence farming is often an immediate means to food security at the household level.
  • National and regional capacity to address food insecurity must be strengthened: Governance constraints and continuing challenges at the national and regional levels can undermine efforts to respond to food insecurity. The level of institutional capacity is considered a key determinant for the attainment of food security objectives in many countries. Specific governance issues related to food insecurity vary enormously within countries and regions. Lack of integration between national policies and implementation mechanisms at the local level, such as investments in infrastructure to support “farm – to – market” transportation and “access – to – market” information, and limited extension services to ensure appropriation by farmers of new agricultural practices that could boost sustainable agricultural productivity are examples of important factors limiting improvements to food security.

2. Explain the issue and describe why you are proposing it:

  1. Achieving food security is a significant and growing challenge in the developing world and highly critical to alleviating poverty. People’s health and education and their ability to work, assert their rights, and achieve equality are compromised by not having food security. In developing countries, women and girls are the most susceptible to the impacts of food insecurity because they have less access to and control over resources than men.
  2. There are numerous causes of food insecurity. These include population growth and rising food, transportation, and agricultural costs. As well, the recent economic downturn has resulted in reduced global investment in food and agricultural development.

3. What kind of activity do you propose to address this issue? Which kind of CFS workstream should be put in place to address it?

While improved ‘green water’ management will contribute to meeting the increased food demand, investments in ‘blue water’ infrastructure, such as dams and irrigation systems, are still needed. These investments need to ensure optimal returns to society at large, including more ‘jobs per drop’. A large proportion of the world’s food production is based on un-sustainable exploitation of groundwater that at the same time are threatened by increasing pollution by agro-chemicals.