全球粮食安全与营养论坛 (FSN论坛)

磋商会

拟议组建国际粮食及农业数字化理事会

20191月全球粮食及农业论坛(GFFA[1]期间,以包容性多利益相关者方法探讨农业及粮食领域数字化技术的必要性得到彰显,来自世界各国的约74位农业部长和国际组织高级别代表承诺利用数字化技术的潜力来提高农业生产和生产力同时改善可持续性、资源高效利用、就业和创业机会以及生活条件,特别是在农村地区。

        农业部长们以《2019年部长公报》[2]的方式要求粮农组织与包括世界银行、非洲开发银行、农发基金、世界粮食计划署、经合组织、世贸组织、国际电信联盟、世界动物卫生组织和非加太-欧盟农业与农村合作技术中心开展磋商,起草一份有关组建粮食及农业数字化理事会,帮助有关各方抓住数字化提供的机遇的概念文件。

每个组织已经指定联络人组成工作团队,共同编写一份关于建立国际粮食及农业数字化理事会的概念文件,作为落实这一动议的第一步。这一理事会将以协作的方式探讨和制定自愿准则,向政策制定者提供建议并加强最佳实践方面的知识交流,从而在数字化转型的时代助推可持续农业和农村发展。

        截至目前,粮农组织与其他国际组织共同:

  • 主持一个开放性磋商进程在有关多利益相关者的参与下编制组建国际粮食及农业数字化理事会的建议书;
  • 着手编写一份概念文件,以参与式达成共识的方法对组建国际粮食及农业数字化理事会的职责范围(目的、范畴、职能、法律作用和责任以及运行模式)进行界定,另加一份实施路线图;以及
  • 为组建和落实国际粮食及农业数字化理事会动议拟定构成、机制和时间安排方案

鉴于这一背景,本次磋商会的目的是请利益相关者、有关各方和个人参与拟议的概念文件的编制和修改。

目前粮农组织正在德勤的支持下,通过一系列磋商会议与工作团队联络人进行磋商的方式起草这一文件。在本次在线磋商之后,粮农组织与各联络人将再次召集讨论在线磋商进程的成果并编写概念文件最终稿。对于本次磋商,我们将就概念文件中仍需要意见和建议的某些主要章节向各位征集意见。

为更全面了解关于组建数字化理事会的看法,我们谨请各位对下列问题给予思考:

  1.  在应对挑战促进数字化农业发展方面政府有哪些潜在切入点?(请点击此处参阅概念文件有关章节
  2. 组建数字化理事会能够以何种方式应对采用这些技术面临的众多障碍因素(请点击此处参阅概念文件的有关章节
  3. 你认为为数字化理事会确定的各项职能能够适于应对上述粮食系统的挑战吗?(请点击此处参阅概念文件的有关章节
  4. 你认为要使理事会履行职能应当采用何种治理结构?(请点击此处参阅概念文件的有关章节
  5. 请添加你认为概念文件还应包括的其他意见或相关内容。

       感谢各位对编制粮食及农业数字化理事会概念文件的宝贵贡献,感谢各位帮助工作团队编写一份兼顾所有有关利益相关者意见和经验的综合性文件。

顺致敬意。



Samuel Varas, 粮农组织

Meng Zeng, 粮农组织

 

*点击姓名阅读该成员的所有评论并与他/她直接联系
  • 阅读 109 提交内容
  • 扩展所有

女士 Ateca Kama

National Food and Nutrition Centre, Ministry of Health and Medical Services
斐济

Agree. Our societies, from production to consumption, are now tech-driven and we now mostly depend on technology to link the producers to the consumers and every other parties involved in this space. This provision will provide a very important platform and linkage that is critical to information-sharing of best practices that everyone can contribute to, and benefit from. It will connect and provide more leverage and impetus to food and nutrition security in all forms. 

English translation below

Les technologies mobiles doivent être mises à contribution pour réussir le défi de la e-agriculture. Il faut utiliser les résultats de la recherche et ne recourir à de nouvelles recherches qu'en cas de nécessité. Je vous propose déjà ma thèse de doctorat pour exploitation. Technologies mobiles en milieu agricole

Nous devons utiliser tout le potentiel des drônes pour la facilitation du travail du producteur. Ensuite, les réseaux de jeunes spécialistes des TIC et du marketing peuvent être mis à contribution pour la commercialisation. Il faut un partage de rôle pour l'efficacité de l'action. Nous avons par exemple la plateforme de promotion de l'ananas pain de sucre du Bénin qui met les acheteurs en relations avec les vendeurs. affaire mobile Bénin

The use of mobile technologies must be harnessed to meet the challenge of e-agriculture. It is essential to use the results of research and start new research only when necessary. In the meantime, I am submitting my doctoral thesis for your use. Technologies mobiles en milieu agricole (Mobile technologies in agricultural environments)

Drones must be used to their full potential to facilitate the work of producers. Then, networks of young ICT and marketing specialists can be mobilized to commercialize the products. It is necessary to share roles to ensure the effectiveness of the action. One example is the Benin Sugar Loaf Pineapple Promotion Platform, which connects buyers with sellers. affaire mobile Bénin

English translation below

J'ai le plaisir de vous faire parvenir ma contribution concernant l'utilisation des technologies de l'information dans l'agriculture. (version FR et EN)

Meilleures salutations.

Bouzidi.M

I am pleased to send you my contribution on the use of information technology in agriculture. (FR and EN version)

Best regards.

Bouzidi.M

This is welcome step, considering the rapidly changing agricultural landscape. The older generation in developing countries may not find it much useful but the youth may find it attractive option to get constructively engaged in agriculture since already they are using too much of  Social Media, for fun. Unless agriculture is data driven, it is simply a way of life where profit is not taken into account. Unless we do farming as business, we are not likely to benefit from it. We need more agripreenurs than simply the farmers. For this to happen, digitalization is a must. We need to take into consideration-access, avaialbility, afforadability and content updating in digital arena. The concept note prepared has mentioned about this but at the level of implemetation, monitoring would be required to ensure inclusiveness. 

https://medium.com/@UN_CFS/can-social-media-lure-youth-into-agripreneurship-e67fcdaac695

Potential entry points for government to address challenges and foster the development of digital agriculture:

Nowdays agricultural services and input can and are acquired from other countries. Digital agriculture should focus to act across borders. To do that the Council should be designed in a way that harmonises guidelines from different countries and come up with common entry points that fit in different countries.

 

This is one among the long awaited initiative by the FAO particulary in Tanzania, the country agriculture sector has been making efforts and policies to intergrate itself with  digital solutions.

I believe the council would find its place on solving the agrifood system challenges in countries such as this. As the country population continues to swell and  climate change is further increasing the risk in food production, we surely need to formulate sustainable plans to feed the growing population. With digital inclusion this objective is likely to be met. With this remark, yes I believe the roles identified for the digital council will contribute to a large extentent in addressing the agrifood systems challenges.

What are the potential entry points for government to address challenges and foster the development of digital agriculture?

  • Availability of digital agriculture and geo data base.
  • GIS & RS Graduated staff (capacity building) for such digital data base (data collector, data entry and data analyzer …etc.).
  • Cooperation or data exchange between farmers and agriculture / statistics extensions.
  • Ability for data base updates & harmonization.
  • Financial resources: formulation & running cost for the structure of digital agriculture unit.
  • Financial resources: survey / gathering and frequently updating the data base.
  • Digital data accessibility between the unit staff and/or between the stakeholders.
  • Capacity building for the unit staff (policy and technical staff).       

 

How can the establishment of the Digital Council address the numerous barriers to adoption of these technologies?

  • By creating an environmental present / prediction maps (land, water & land suitability, land use …etc), road map for marketing and investment map.
  • If the data are accessible to different governmental sectors & to stakeholder.
  • If the data are within acceptable cost for the users.
  • Build up a trusted report through international consultant. 

 

Do you think that the roles identified for the Digital Council are suitable for facing the agrifood systems challenges outlined above?

In addition to the CN for this section: I think through modeling (SWAT), we have to add (Policy & Alternative for a certain crop production in a certain region) in order to increase agricultural production and productivity.

 

What governance structure should be in place in order for the Council to serve its purpose?

 

 

Director

 

            Executive Council                                                                                  International Coordinator

 

Advisory Committee

 

 

Secretariat

 

 

Policy Maker                     Technical staff (modeling & mapping)                                     Data analyzer

 

In pursuit of establishing an international digital council for food and agriculture, we cross yet another degree where we face the useful reality to certain aspects we know of social media platforms. It is another pivotal moment of deciding how much power online council, online currency and online voting power we should allow. It is another moment where we may not be doing anything accept performing bureaucracy.

For myself, it has seemed curious how for years we can not facilitate an individual citizen; accurate vote on individual issues and tax dollars spent, when the means do so through social security numbers (and a few numbers) has existed more than a decade.

Total voting regulatory power could sit well within the now very popular block chain technologies, and this all bates mention of a Panama colleagues' Producers Market token, an agriculture v.s. digital technology solution. I happen to have an inside look at the team here and the king of this Hill, more or less selected to my knowledge and likely overall success, by my favorite teacher - and this type of selection in this case certainly, does not come to the undeserving. This model could be extremely proactive in promoting better agriculture that does not harm biology and wildlife.

If I am understanding the Producers Token platform right it would [c] essentially function as a marketing engine for the council itself, and for small transparent organic farmers within the ranks. [d] Food distribution costs can be saved and gained by the consumer and the producer who would be able to connect through the network. It is really quite perfect / even very much so for Nutritional Diversity Diet enthusiasts, who could through a network like this arrange there private food purchases for the required high food biodiversity.

I have enjoyed being one of the more abstract contributors to these important discussions. I also enjoy coming from a standpoint which I feel is correct. Not to get too ahead of things, ....

What about a really proactive council, to reforest using permaculture's food forest model, disaster stricken lands, etc. To educate cattle farmers how through permaculture models and not too much more on investment, can have there cows and and whole bunch of other goodies too.

If we can expand our hopes and aim to something of this nature, the smart phone app iNaturalist, seems to be a great functioning database reference for plant species and could play an integral role in bringing humanity back in touch with nature and back up knowledge Parr on functional foods. It is with kind of knowledge that we can live in harmony with nature instead of at odds with it and obtain individual freedom and sustainability.

Can this international council body dare to create insanely incredible ecology to our beautiful world?

As a technical "digital" body can we task ourselves to develop waist collection and conversion technologies -very easily online shared open source development potentials.

In many ways if we don't have the focus on the species,  what are we doing.

If we are focusing on the species regional climate category groups would be able to harvest seed and use young species to supply ever expanding permaculture installations.

A joint efforts standard agreement could be a good fixture. For example should a poor farmer convert and work /grow on certain owned property for 50% take of produce. This could be great to see abandoned pasture or tragically destroyed lands be productively utilized easier. This type of job could be a great path for troubled youth.

Thanks and respecfully,