Consultation

Strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems to achieve food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation

The High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE-FSN) produces the report “Strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems to achieve food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation”, at the request of the Committee on World Food Security (CFS). The HLPE-FSN report will be presented at the 52nd plenary session of the CFS in October 2024.

With this e-consultation, the HLPE-FSN is seeking your feedback on the proposed scope of this report and the guiding questions below.

SCOPE AND RATIONALE

Almost sixty percent of the global population is currently living in urban centres (UNDESA, 2018; Acharya et al., 2020). These centres are widely seen as engines of growth and employment, producing over 80 percent of the global GDP, but also facing huge challenges in guaranteeing access for all residents to essential services such as health, education, transportation and food (Ibid.). Urban populations are rapidly increasing, with a growth curve particularly sharp in Africa and Asia. The fifteen fastest-growing cities in the world, for example, are in Africa. Alongside urbanization, there has been a “geographical decoupling” (Langemeyer et al., 2021) of cities from sources of food supply, with urban and peri-urban land use being reoriented for “more profitable” uses. As such, cities and towns are fast losing peri-urban agricultural lands, which have historically provided them with fresh and healthy food. Urban areas are also experiencing higher rates of extreme weather events that affect people’s livelihoods and incomes, while inequalities among urban populations are growing (Pelling et al., 2021). These trends mean that urban and peri-urban areas also concentrate risks for food insecurity and malnutrition, which became clear during the COVID-19 pandemic (see for example Rede PENSSAN, 2021), exacerbated by natural disasters and conflicts. At the same time, urban and peri-urban areas are resourceful, serving as hubs for education, technology and innovation, health and social services as well as for food production, processing and distribution, all roles that could be enhanced.

Often, in impoverished urban areas, informal economic and market relationships in food systems can be critical for food security, but suffer from policy and regulatory neglect. Informal food systems comprise a complex network of suppliers, transporters, hawkers, retailers and street and market food vendors, in addition to farmers, and contribute to making food more accessible and affordable to urban consumers. Yet, these informal sector actors mainly rely on their own resources and capital and have very little policy support for strengthening their enterprises and ensuring quality, such as support for access to market intelligence, transport and logistics, cold chains or waste reuse facilities (Tefft et al., 2017). In fact, in the absence of specific food system planning, the sale and consumption of highly processed foods is growing in most urban centres, while local commerce offering healthy, fresh food at affordable prices, and often in smaller quantities, is neglected, contributing to the so-called “food deserts”. These trends typically have negative impacts on food security and nutrition (Peyton, Moseley and Battersby, 2015; Battersby, 2017; Acharya et al., 2020).

This policy incoherence insists on a general lack of coordination between policies and actors concerned with food security, agriculture, environment, etc., and urban planning, and it is exacerbated by the general dearth of city-level data, analyses and empirical evidence to inform decision-making on urban and peri-urban food policy. As such, it is difficult for policymakers to plan, prioritize, design and track urban and peri-urban food system interventions and ensure coherence across policies and sectors. Furthermore, governments and other organs like famine early warning systems (FEWS) have also not been as good at monitoring food insecurity in urban areas as they have been in rural areas, beyond very basic indicators such as food prices (Moseley, 2001; Krishnamurthy, Choularton and Kareiva, 2020).

Cities can play a vital role in shaping food system policies to bolster their resilience in several ways. They can source locally or regeneratively grown food where appropriate, facilitate sustainable urban and peri-urban production of nutritious food, avoid food waste by strengthening investments in circular bio-economy (broadly defined as an economy based on the sustainable use, re-use and regeneration of natural resources), build inclusive food markets by investing in infrastructure for smaller scale traders and retailers to market healthier food products. They can also play a role in promoting resilience by mitigating and adapting against the adverse impacts of climate change (HLPE, 2020; Heck and Alonso, 2021).

Urban and peri-urban agriculture is an important option with potentially positive impacts on dietary diversity, the quality of city spaces, and community action and empowerment. Yet, in most cities, especially in the Global South, there is little state support for urban and peri-urban agriculture. Instead, current regulations in cities and the rising market value of peri-urban land limit opportunities for local production. A recent FAO survey indicates that municipal governments play an enormous role in identifying and connecting food system actors to foster innovative community-based initiatives to support food security and nutrition (FAO, 2020). In the face of the dramatic consequences of the pandemic, for example, home gardens provided nutritious and healthy food supplements and ecosystem services (Lal, 2020). Local markets multiplied, as did initiatives by family producers for home delivery of baskets of fresh food and initiatives for food donations to low-income communities. Many people in urban areas, especially new migrants, undocumented people and informal workers, were forced to go to food banks and charities, with great harm to their dignity and agency (Rao et al., 2020). These experiences point to the importance and potential of the territorial dimension of food systems for the realization of the human right to food (Recine et al., 2021).

Given the social and economic significance of urban areas, it is imperative to address the challenges of urbanization in relation to rural transformation to “build back better” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and disruptions to supply chains caused by the war in Ukraine, internal conflicts and natural disasters. It is vital that policies address poverty and inequality, build resilience and social inclusion and foster sustainable livelihoods. The specific needs of diverse rural and urban contexts, the difference between different types of urban areas (e.g. megacities and towns in largely rural areas) and the linkages between them in the rural-urban continuum, should be considered in formulating food policies. The New Urban Agenda, for example, calls for the integration of food and nutrition security into urban and territorial planning (UN Habitat, 2016). The report could also explore the specific issues concerning food security and nutrition that cities face in situations of conflicts, natural disasters and other crises, especially where there is dependence on imported food and vulnerability to price volatility.

A more in-depth analysis of food systems is needed in the context of urbanization and rural transformation to ensure that the right to food and nutrition security, in all its six dimensions (HLPE, 2020), are met. In particular, the report could investigate the potential of territorial and informal markets, the circular economy, and shorter supply chains to strengthen the linkages between urban and peri-urban food production and consumption. The role of food environments in urban areas is particularly important, considering the coexistence of organized distribution (supermarkets) with territorial and informal markets, and the adverse impacts of supermarketization pushing out small and/or informal food retail outlets (Peyton et al. 2015). As such, parts of cities, often the poorest, have become ‘food deserts’ for fresh and healthy produce, thus affecting city diets, which are already characterised by increasing prioritization of processed and convenience food. In addition, urban centres, and especially informal settlement areas, are often characterized by lack of basic infrastructure such as access to potable water and sewages.  Specific attention to water and sanitation needs is thus required in relation to food utilization in urban and peri-urban areas.

At the same time, urban and peri-urban areas are home to interesting innovations for food production, processing and distribution, such as vertical gardens, ethical purchasing groups and marketing innovations, which could be replicated in other contexts. To strengthen the role of urban and peri-urban food systems, it is essential to reflect on the architecture of food security and nutrition governance, and especially on how city councils, urban planning experts and other partners can engage with actors that are traditionally involved in food systems and food security and nutrition policies to enhance synergies. Some of the policy measures that have been recommended in recent years to enhance the role of urban and peri-urban food systems concern the promotion of equitable access to land and productive agricultural resources for small-scale producers. They also include investment in rural and urban infrastructure, the development of territorial markets and short supply chains, prioritizing people living in poverty in cities and rural areas to access nutritious food and healthier living conditions, and anticipating the inter-connected future of urbanization and rural transformation (HLPE, 2020; Heck and Alonso, 2021).

Building on the outcomes of the CFS Open Ended Working Group (OEWG) on Urbanization, rural transformation and implications for food security and nutrition (CFS 2017/44/6 and CFS 2016/43/11), recent literature and policy debates, the report will explore these issues and formulate policy recommendations to the attention of the CFS.

QUESTIONS TO GUIDE THE E-CONSULTATION ON THE SCOPE OF THE HLPE-FSN REPORT

The HLPE-FSN is seeking your feedback on the proposed scope of the report “Strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems to achieve food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation”, in particular, you are invited to:

A

Share your comments on the objectives and proposed content of this report as outlined above.

Do you find the proposed scope comprehensive to analyze and discuss the key issues concerning the role of urban and peri-urban food systems in achieving food security and nutrition? Are there any major gaps or omissions?

B

Share good practices and successful experiences on strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems in the context of urbanization and rural transformation, including in the case of emergencies or conflicts.

C

Share recent literature, case studies and data that could help answer the following questions:

1.            What are the main bottlenecks hampering the contribution of urban and peri-urban food systems to food security and nutrition?

2.            How can urban and peri-urban food systems be transformed and made more equitable and accessible both for food system actors and in terms of food security and nutrition outcomes?

3.            How can urban food supply chains, formal and informal, local and global, be made more resilient to ensure food security and nutrition within urban settings?

4.            What changes are needed in urban planning to better support all dimensions of food security – including support for human rights, agency and sustainability? Which are some of the measures that can strengthen the agency of local actors in urban and peri-urban food systems? 

5.            How can national and municipal governments strengthen the potential for low-carbon, inclusive, relatively self-sufficient and resilient cities and towns to drive improved food security and nutrition in the wake of climate change and other crises?

6.            What are the most appropriate policies (and gaps in existing policies) along the rural-urban continuum to address issues of land tenure, urban expansion into farmland and the growing competition for natural resources?

7.            How can urban and peri-urban food systems ensure that food and nutrition needs of specific groups of people, such as migrants, the internally-displaced, children, adolescent, etc., are met?

8.            What are the potential benefits and challenges of territorial markets for strengthening food security and nutrition for urban populations?

9.            In what ways can the incorporation of climate resilient agricultural and circular economy practices in urban and peri-urban agriculture provide climate co-benefits for all and enhance climate resilience?

10.         How can citizens be engaged and empowered to drive inclusive, transparent, participatory processes for urban transformations, ensuring synergies and complementarity with city councils?

11.         Which experiences of urban communities to increase access to fresh food and healthy diets can inspire broader public policies?

 

The results of this consultation will be used by the HLPE-FSN to elaborate the report, which will then be made public in its V0 draft for e-consultation, and later submitted to peer review, before finalization and approval by the HLPE-FSN drafting team and the Steering Committee.

We thank in advance all the contributors for reading, commenting and providing inputs on the scope of this HLPE-FSN report. The comments are accepted in English, French and Spanish languages.

The HLPE-FSN looks forward to a rich consultation!

Évariste Nicolétis, HLPE-FSN Coordinator

Paola Termine, HLPE-FSN Programme Officer


References

Acharya, G. Cassou, E. Jaffee, S., Ludher, E.K. 2020. RICH Food, Smart City: How Building Reliable, Inclusive, Competitive, and Healthy Food Systems is Smart Policy for Urban Asia. Washington, DC, World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/35137   

Battersby, J. 2017. Food system transformation in the absence of food system planning: the case of supermarket and shopping mall retail expansion in Cape Town, South Africa. Built Environment, 43(3): 417-430.

FAO. 2020. Cities and local governments at the forefront in building inclusive and resilient food systems: Key results from the FAO Survey “Urban Food Systems and COVID-19”, Revised version. Rome.

Heck, S. & Alonso, S. 2021. Resilient Cities Through Sustainable Urban and Peri-Urban Agrifood Systems. Montpellier, France, CGIAR. Resilient-Cities.pdf (storage.googleapis.com)

HLPE. 2020. Food security and nutrition: building a global narrative towards 2030. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/ca9731en/ca9731en.pdf

Krishnamurthy, P. K., Choularton, R. J., & Kareiva, P. 2020. Dealing with uncertainty in famine predictions: How complex events affect food security early warning skill in the Greater Horn of Africa. Global Food Security, 26: 100374.

Lal, R. 2020. Home gardening and urban agriculture for advancing food and nutritional security in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Food Security, 12: 871-876. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-020-01058-3

Langemeyer, J., Madrid-López, C., Mendoza Beltrán, A. & Villalba Mendez, G. 2021. Urban agriculture — A necessary pathway towards urban resilience and global sustainability? Landscape and Urban Planning, 210: 104055. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204621000189

Moseley, W. G. 2001. Monitoring urban food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Geographical Review, 21(1): 81-90.

Pelling, M., Chow, W. T. L., Chu, E., Dawson, R., Dodman, D., Fraser, A., Hayward, B. et al. 2021. A climate resilience research renewal agenda: learning lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for urban climate resilience. Climate and Development, 0(0): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.1956411

Peyton, S., Moseley, W. & Battersby, J. 2015. Implications of supermarket expansion on urban food security in Cape Town, South Africa. African Geographical Review, 34(1): 36-54.

Rao, N., Narain, N., Chakraborty, S., Bhanjdeo, A. & Pattnaik, A. 2020. Destinations Matter: Social Policy and Migrant Workers in the Times of Covid. The European Journal of Development Research, 32(5): 1639–1661. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590571/

Recine, E., Preiss, P.V., Valencia, M. et al. 2021. The Indispensable Territorial Dimension of Food Supply: A View from Brazil During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Development, 64: 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00308-x    

Rede Brasileira de Pesquisa em Soberania e Segurança Alimentar (Rede PENSSAN). 2021. VIGISAN National Survey of Food Insecurity in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Brazil https://olheparaafome.com.br/VIGISAN_AF_National_Survey_of_Food_Insecurity.pdf

Tefft, J., Jonasova, M., Adjao, R. & Morgan, A. 2017. Food systems for an urbanizing world. Washington DC, World Bank and Rome, FAO.

UNDESA (UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs). 2018. 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. New York. Cited June 2022. https://desapublications.un.org/file/615/download

UN-Habitat (United Nations Human Settlements Programme). 2016. The New Urban Agenda. Nairobi. https://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf

В настоящее время это мероприятие закрыто. Пожалуйста, свяжитесь с [email protected] для получения любой дополнительной информации.

* Нажмите на имя, чтобы ознакомиться с комментариями, оставленными участником, и свяжитесь с ним / ней напрямую
  • Прочитано 96 комментарии
  • Развернуть все

The proposed scope broadly addresses issues relevant to urban and peri-urban food systems in achieving food security and nutrition.

An important area that should be addressed, in addition, relates to the tenure of land, fisheries and forests, including in relation to recording legitimate tenure rights, their valuation, taxation and spatial planning. These issues are dealt with in the CFS Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the context of National Food Security.

Many countries lack adequate systems for recording legitimate tenure rights; for identifying, analysing and understanding property values; for implementing appropriate equitable systems of property taxation to provide resources for local services, and; for transparent spatial planning systems.

These are important elements in enabling and managing urban and peri-urban agriculture.

Greetings from the University of Manitoba, Canada!

My comment/question is regarding urban and peri-urban food systems. Has there been any research done on the viability of urban community gardens specifically located on car park rooftops (parkades, garage parking lots)? My thinking is that it would make use of urban locations that are often underutilized while creating sites that contribute to a host of community and environmental benefits at a fraction of the cost of traditional green roof tops. Not only would such roof top gardens help reduce food insecurity related to food deserts in urban areas, but they would also create biodiversity within cityscapes, resting spots for pollinators, sequester carbon and filter air pollutants, and reduce the effect of urban heat islands, making them a form of climate resilient agriculture. They would be adaptable and scalable to a wide range of locations and circumstances—as simple as a pot of tomatoes to as elaborate and involved as money and space allow. The sites also have the advantage of being easily accessible to local communities and encouraging the agency of local actors and potentially contributing to community economic development . Existing carparks could be easily retrofitted, and new ones could include purpose-built features. Local governments or city councils could readily support local development of projects one rooftop at a time.

Best regard,

Holly Scotland     

 

Shashi Bhooshan Sharma

Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University; World BioProtection Research Foundation
Австралия

Let me take this opportunity to thank you for sharing information on an important project - Strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems to achieve food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation. The proposal is well researched and comprehensive. The project team must be congratulated for this excellent work. Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback. The project aims to address the challenges of food insecurity and malnutrition in urban and peri-urban areas resulting from urbanization, rural transformation, and policy neglect. However, it could benefit from additional information on specific interventions, policies, and best practices that have been successful in strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems. Additionally, it would be helpful to discuss the challenges of implementing such interventions and policies in different contexts and the need for a tailored approach to suit different urban and peri-urban areas. There appear to be some potential gaps that could be addressed. Here are a few examples:

1. While the proposal discusses the importance of addressing food security and nutrition in urban and peri-urban areas, it does not provide clear goals or objectives for the project.

2. There is limited discussion of policy solutions to the some of the challenges faced by urban and peri-urban food systems. It does not include a comprehensive discussion of potential policy solutions to these challenges.

3. The consideration given to concerns relating to equity and social justice appears to be inadequate. A detailed analysis of how these inequalities are produced or perpetuated by food systems may be helpful in developing plans for addressing these inequalities.

4. While the proposal notes the lack of city-level data and empirical evidence to inform decision-making on urban and peri-urban food policy, it does not provide a plan for how to address this data gap in the proposed project. Without data and evidence, it may be difficult to make informed decisions and ensure that the project is effectively addressing the identified issues.

5. Inclusion of policy and preparedness provision for ensuring biosecurity of the urban and peri-urban food systems.

6. Emphasis on food education such as implementation of concepts like Shokuiku.

In addition to the above, the project may benefit from further consideration of the following to strengthen urban and peri-urban food systems:

  • Technology and innovation: The use of modern technology and innovation can help to increase food production and efficiency in urban and peri-urban areas. This can include initiatives such as hydroponics, precision agriculture, and vertical farming.
  • Food policy: Developing policies that promote healthy and sustainable food systems can have a significant impact on food security and nutrition. This can include measures such as promoting locally sourced food, reducing food waste, and supporting small-scale farmers.
  • Food education: Educating urban residents about healthy eating and food preparation can help to promote better eating habits and reduce the incidence of malnutrition. This can include initiatives such as cooking classes, nutrition education programs, and community gardens.
  • Food waste reduction: Food waste is a major problem in urban areas and reducing it can free up resources and increase food availability. This can be achieved through composting, food banks, and other initiatives that encourage the redistribution of surplus food.
  • Urban farming and gardening: Encouraging the cultivation of crops and rearing of livestock within cities and peri-urban areas can provide a source of fresh and nutritious food for residents. It can also create employment opportunities and promote community participation.
  • Urban food markets: Establishing food markets in urban areas can help to bridge the gap between rural and urban areas by facilitating the exchange of goods and information. It can also promote healthy eating by providing access to fresh and nutritious food.
  • Small-scale food producers: Small-scale farmers and food producers should be supported with access to land, financing, technology, training, and other resources to increase their productivity and profitability.
  • Food policies that prioritize equity: Food policies should prioritize equity and social justice, with a focus on promoting local food systems, supporting small-scale farmers, and ensuring that food is accessible and affordable for all.
  • Food infrastructure: Food infrastructure such as storage facilities, processing plants, and markets should be built to support local food systems and increase access to fresh and nutritious food.
  • Food distribution networks: Food distribution networks should be developed to ensure that fresh and nutritious food is accessible and affordable for all residents, regardless of their income level or location.
  • Food literacy: Increasing food literacy among urban residents can help to promote healthy eating habits and reduce food waste.
  • Food justice and anti-hunger initiatives: Food justice and anti-hunger initiatives should be supported to ensure that all residents have access to adequate and nutritious food.

Ingrid Jacobsen

Bread for the World, German Protestantic Church
Германия

The proposed scope of the report is already very comprehensive. However, the report is mainly focusing on the production and marketing side of food systems. These are important aspects, but looking at the consumer side is needed as well. A more holistic view on food security, which is taking into consideration the general living conditions of the urban poor and people living in informal settlements on the outskirts of the city will add value to the report.

1. Food insecurity in urban areas is less a problem of food availability in general but a problem of the lack of spending capacity of low income households. Living costs in cities are extremely high, especially for securing shelter and transport. Rents in the regulated and even more in the unregulated informal rental markets are a heavy burden for poor people but have to be paid, even by households with very low and precarious income. I many cases low-income households are forced to save on food and skip meals to be able to pay their rents and transportation costs to get to work.

2. Due to the high rental costs in well-located city areas people have to share the costs and the space they live in. As a consequence, especially poor households often ive in very dense conditions. In many cases, there is no space for food or water storage and there is also no space for cooking. Food has to be bought in the streets or as mostly imported highly processed and unhealthy products, which are easy to prepare e.g. with hot water only.

3. More and more people in urban or peri-urban areas are living in informal or even illegal housing conditions with very bad or even not existent physical infrastructure. Access to water and electricity in these areas is scarce or not available. Drinking water has to be bought at very high prices. There often is no possibility to install cooling facilities and food gets rotted quickly. These settlements are growing fast and unplanned and therefor there is seldom space for markets with fresh local products and vegetables and people are pushed into consuming imported products, which in most cases are highly processed and unhealthy.

4. People living in informal or illegal housing conditions are in a permanent threat of being resettled or even evicted. This hampers them to start with own food production like urban gardening. It also make it difficult for them to organize themselves in all kinds of social networks especially networks related to food access, e.g. food policy councils or similar platforms. In these areas people generally do not have a formal address and therefore they do not qualify for social protection schemes to improve the family income or to get access to governmental food supply schemes like school meals etc.

Conclusion: the improvement of housing conditions based on the human right to adequate shelter is closely related to the implementation of the right to food and nutrition as well as the right to water. It should be mentioned as a pre-condition to improve food security in urban and peri-urban areas.

  1. Natural Resources Institute – University of Greenwich UK
  2. World Vegetable Center – Tanzania, Thailand
  3. WorldFish - Malaysia
  • Ms Lydia O’Meara – PhD Candidate
  • Dr Julia de Bruyn
  • Dr Kendra Byrd
  • Dr Jody Harris
  • Assoc Prof Paula Dominguez-Salas

4.            What changes are needed in urban planning to better support all dimensions of food security – including support for human rights, agency and sustainability? Which are some of the measures that can strengthen the agency of local actors in urban and peri-urban food systems?

7.            How can urban and peri-urban food systems ensure that food and nutrition needs of specific groups of people, such as migrants, the internally-displaced, children, adolescent, etc., are met?

Response: This is a timely topic. Please find below examples and references of key leverage points for improving urban food systems, with a focus on increasing access to nutrient-rich foods recommended for both human and planetary health (e.g., fish and aquatic foods) for nutritionally vulnerable groups. Examples are given for both external (built) food environments and personal (individual) environments.

To improve the micronutrient adequacy and diet quality of urban populations, it is important to improve, and scale:

  • Safe and affordable food preservation and packaging methods for highly perishable, yet often the most nutritious foods, such as animal source foods (including fish), fruits and vegetables.Examples are given for fish and aquatic foods.
    • Technology for fish smoking in West Africa. Smoked fish is a nutritious and largely safe food (Byrd et al, in preparation) important to diets in Western Africa and the Eastern Africa Great Lakes Region (de Bruyn et al, 2021), but smoke inhalation among the processors and their families can lead to excess morbidity (Weyant et al, 2022). Improved technology for fish smoking that both reduces fish waste and loss and to improve the health of the fish processors is available but has yet to be scaled (Akintola and Fakoya, 2017). The fish processors also need access to financing to purchase new tools (such as improved fish smokers) and to invest in small enterprises, making them resilient to external market forces and securing this aspect of the fisheries value chain for generations to come.
    • Extending the value chains / reach of small, dried fish products within the Eastern African Great Lakes Region could help improve the diet quality of children that live close to urban markets (e.g. those that live far from lakes and rivers) (O’Meara et al., 2021a, Byrd et al, 2021).
    • Ongoing spatial analysis of GIS-tagged nationally representative secondary data (e.g. Demographic and Health Surveys, Global Lakes and Wetlands Database, SWOT — Surface Water and Ocean Topography database, Accessibility to Cities databases) sources could provide affordable methods for monitoring and evaluating supply chain access to nutritious foods such as fish from capture fisheries (O’Meara et al., 2021a).

Physical access to food sources:

  • Many urban populations, especially the most marginalised (i.e. poorest living in slums) are often limited to accessing food sources that are within walking distance – due to constraints in the availability, affordability and suitability of public transport, and time and convenience of travel to more distant food sources. These barriers may be exacerbated for older people, those with disability, or those with children. Therefore, urban planning needs to prioritise decentralisation of urban wet markets / farmers markets and improvement of urban walkability (O’Meara et al 2021b; O’Meara(b) et al. in preparation). This would also make food environments more resilient in the face of future health crises such as epidemics.

Delivery of social protection programmes

  • Uneven delivery of services / poor implementation (e.g. weaknesses in delivery of existing social protection programmes, logistical barriers for marginalized groups such as elderly, migrants, and those under house quarantine in accessing government cash assistance)  is a strong barrier to achieving food security for marginalised groups, especially during emergency responses; therefore, adequate monitoring and evaluation is critical to inform improvement of policy roll-out to (i) build foundational resilience before emergencies, and (ii) enhance effectiveness of acute responses (O’Meara(b) et al, in preparation).

Regarding the scope – it would be nice to see this report extend beyond the built environment (e.g. availability, development of preservation methods for nutrient-dense foods/extension of supply chains, walkability of cities, proximity of markets) to also many of the personal food environment dimensions that mitigate the ability of individuals to interact with and procure healthy food from the external food environment, such as physical accessibility (transport access, disability, age, caregiving responsibilities, time, housing affordability/residential location), financial accessibility (e.g. women’s financial autonomy, livelihoods for vulnerable groups), and positive resilient community behaviours (e.g. social support/networks)

To make food systems more resilient to shocks – urban planning should also focus on strengthening personal food environment dimensions, alongside improving healthfulness of the external built environment.

Foster social capital / support and networks:

  • During Covid-19 mobility restrictions, studies highlight the importance of strong social support / networks for food security, especially for women and other marginalised groups. Therefore, urban planning should prioritise policies that strengthen urban community connections, and development and maintenance of strong social networks such as safe community meeting places and support for self-help groups (O’Meara et al 2021b; O’Meara(b) et al. in preparation).

Enhance personal agency

  • Women’s personal agency is a strong determinant of a woman’s ability to procure sufficient healthy food (O’Meara(a) et al, in preparation; Hope et al, in preparation). Constraints on women’s financial autonomy and women’s time use are strong barriers to dietary adequacy. Therefore, it is important that policies: (i) devise equitable strategies to enhance food security for women, including financial empowerment strategies; and (ii) monitor and evaluate short and long-term effects of urban planning on women’s personal agency indicators at multiple levels (e.g. women’s financial autonomy and physical mobility), alongside women’s nutrition and health outcomes.

 

References:

Akintola, S. L. & Fakoya, K. A. Small-scale fisheries in the context of traditional post-harvest practice

and the quest for food and nutritional security in Nigeria. Agric. Food Secur. 6, 1–17 (2017).

Byrd, K. A., Pincus, L., Pasqualino, M. M., Muzofa, F. & Cole, S. M. Dried small fish provide nutrient

densities important for the first 1000 days. Matern. Child Nutr. e13192 (2021) doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13192.

de Bruyn J, Wesana J, Bunting SW, Thilsted SH, Cohen PJ. Fish Acquisition and Consumption in the African Great Lakes Region through a Food Environment Lens: A Scoping Review. Nutrients. 2021; 13(7):2408. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu1307240

O’Meara, L., Cohen, P.J., Simmance, F., Marinda, P., Nagoli, J., Teoh, S.J., Funge-Smith, S., Mills, D., Thilsted, S., Byrd, K. (2021a) Inland fisheries critical for the diet quality of young children in sub-Saharan Africa, Global Food Security, 28, 100483, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100483.

O’Meara, L., Turner, C., Coitinho, D.C., Oenema, S. (2021b) Consumer experiences of food environments during the Covid-19 pandemic: Global insights from a rapid online survey of individuals from 119 countries, Global Food Security, 100594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100594.

O’Meara, L., de Bruyn, J., Dominguez-Salas, P., Turner, C., Hope, T., Wellard, K., Stoynova, M., Ferguson, E. (2022) Characteristics of food environments that influence food acquisition and diets of women in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol (JBI Evidence Synthesis JBIES-21-00482).

Hope, T.; O'Meara, L.; Ohl, M.; O'Mullan, C. (2022) The impact of women's empowerment in food systems on women's dietary diversity in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis (protocol). PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022298612 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022298612

Weyant, C. L. et al. Occupational Exposure and Health in the Informal Sector: Fish Smoking in Coastal Ghana. Environ. Health Perspect. 130, (2022).

In preparation:

Byrd, K., Li, H., Fakoya, K. & Fiorella, K. Fresh large fish are commonly consumed among women in

Nigeria, but dried small fish are the richest in iron, zinc, calcium, and vitamin B-12.

O’Meara(a), L.; de Bruyn, J.; Dominguez-Salas, P.; Hope, T.; Fago, M.; Hodge, R.; Turner, C.; Stoynova, M.; Wellard, K.; Ferguson, E. (in preparation). Conceptual framework of food environments for women in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review.

O’Meara(b), L.; Sison, C; Isarabhakdi, P.; Turner, C.; Harris, J. (in preparation). ‘Whatever we have is what we eat’ the lived experience of the COVID-19 pandemic on food environments and diets of marginalised urban groups in the Philippines and Thailand.

Hope, T.; O'Meara, L.; O'Mullan, C. (in preparation) The impact of women's empowerment in food systems on women's dietary diversity in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Dear HLPE-FSN team,

Thank you for the opportunity to participate at this online consultation on "Strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems to achieve food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation“. On behalf of the Brazilian Ministry of Rural Development and Family Farming (MDA), we would like to share the attached document, which has some comments and national experiences on the topic. 

Best regards,

Brazilian Ministry of Rural Development and Family Farming (MDA) - Office for International Affairs

L'alimentation est un élément clé des objectifs de développement durable (ODD) du Programme de développement durable à l’horizon 2030.

L'objectif de développement durable n°2 vise à éliminer la faim, à assurer la sécurité alimentaire, à améliorer la nutrition et à promouvoir l’agriculture durable. Les cibles visées par cet objectifs consistent notamment à :

  • Éliminer la faim et faire en sorte que chacun ait accès tout au long de l’année à une alimentation saine, nutritive et suffisante ;
  • Mettre fin à toutes les formes de malnutrition ;
  • Doubler la productivité agricole et les revenus des petits producteurs alimentaires ;
  • Assurer la viabilité des systèmes de production alimentaire ;
  • Accroître l’investissement en faveur de l’infrastructure rurale ;
  • Corriger et prévenir les restrictions et distorsions commerciales sur les marchés agricoles mondiaux ;
  • Adopter des mesures visant à assurer le bon fonctionnement des marchés de denrées alimentaire.

    Les femmes et les enfants restent les plus vulnérables. Le contexte de crise est aggravé par l’immobilisme politique, le ralentissement de la croissance économique et les faiblesses structurelles en matière de développement.  

  • la population est en insécurité alimentaire ;
  • la population à un accès difficile aux infrastructures et services sociaux de base de qualité ;
  • les voies de communications sont délabrées et peu praticables ;
  • des ménages ont une faible revenue

A Do you find the proposed scope comprehensive to analyze and discuss the key issues concerning the role of urban and peri-urban food systems in achieving food security and nutrition? Are there any major gaps or omissions?

All dimensions of food security should be addressed. For example, the aspect of food availability could take into account aspects such as physical availability of food considering value chain aspects such as production, processing, reserves, markets as well as transportation (but being mindful of the GHGs), secondly the dimension of utilization (i.e. maximizing nutrients and energy, including preparation, serving, inclusion of various diets and lastly accessibility and stability – by ensuring a better integration of resources between rural and urban areas, procurement policies and accessibility despite physical and economic constraints, exploring opportunities in local food production and shorter supply chains

B Share good practices and successful experiences on strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems in the context of urbanization and rural transformation, including in the case of emergencies or conflicts.

  • Use public food procurement (including for school meals) to support shorter food supply chains and small-scale farmers
  • Support food sharing practices, which allow to enhance urban-rural linkages through knowledge and skills sharing
  • Strengthen fresh food markets (e.g. develop enabling policy environment for local fresh food markets to grow, support smallholder access to markets by providing infrastructure, finance and business assistance, connect market actors with local authorities)
  • Create market opportunities for small-scale producers and facilitate direct relationships between producers and consumers.
  • Facilitate access to land for farmers, including in peri-urban areas (local authorities have a key role to play as they can act on land they own, regulate the way others act, and convene and facilitate connections)

C Share recent literature, case studies and data that could help answer the following questions:

1. What are the main bottlenecks hampering the contribution of urban and peri-urban food systems to food security and nutrition?

  • Lack of collaboration between local government, local farmers, local consumers and local non-government organizations

2.  How can urban and peri-urban food systems be transformed and made more equitable and accessible both for food system actors and in terms of food security and nutrition outcomes?

3. How can urban food supply chains, formal and informal, local and global, be made more resilient to ensure food security and nutrition within urban settings?

Resilient food supply chains require short distances, support to small-scale farmers and diversification of food production to build more self-sufficiency in the territory. Example of key projects are COACH and SchoolFood4Change 

4. What changes are needed in urban planning to better support all dimensions of food security – including support for human rights, agency, and sustainability? Which are some of the measures that can strengthen the agency of local actors in urban and peri-urban food systems?

  • Develop a set of resilience indicators to support countries on a local and national level in developing more Resilient food systems

5. How can national and municipal governments strengthen the potential for low-carbon, inclusive, relatively self-sufficient and resilient cities and towns to drive improved food security and nutrition in the wake of climate change and other crises?

6.  What are the most appropriate policies (and gaps in existing policies) along the rural-urban continuum to address issues of land tenure, urban expansion into farmland and the growing competition for natural resources?

COACH aims to facilitate collaboration between farmers, consumers, local governments and other actors to scale up short agri-food chains which rebalance farmers’ position, create win-wins for producers and consumers and drive innovation in territorial food systems

7.  How can urban and peri-urban food systems ensure that food and nutrition needs of specific groups of people, such as migrants, the internally-displaced, children, adolescent, etc., are met?

Identify the barriers and factors that influence dietary behaviors of different groups, taking into account geographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, gender, and cultural differences. The project places particular emphasis on a multi-stakeholder approach, always prioritizing the needs and interests of vulnerable groups and ensuring that no one is left behind (FEAST)

8.  What are the potential benefits and challenges of territorial markets for strengthening food security and nutrition for urban populations?

  • Extended food value chains and power imbalances make it difficult for farmers to access markets and earn a decent income.
  • COACH facilitates collaboration between farmers, consumers and local governments to scale up short agri-food value chains to create a favorable conditions for both producers and consumers

 9. In what ways can the incorporation of climate resilient agricultural and circular economy practices in urban and peri-urban agriculture provide climate co-benefits for all and enhance climate resilience?

The framework of circular food systems offers actionable steps to decrease overall waste production and resource consumption. It also offers various co-benefits:

  • Climate action: Circular food systems decrease need for new production, protect carbon sinks and create new sources of sustainable energy (e.g. from waste heat, anaerobic digestion of organic waste).
  • Resilience: Circular food systems reduce reliance on scarce resources, support resource efficient infrastructure and diversify the sources of key resource flows such as energy and water.
  • Biodiversity protection: Circular food systems reduce waste production and pollution as well as pressure on natural resources.
  • Inclusion: Circular food systems  increase access to products and services through the promotion of waste prevention and resource sharing.
  • Innovation: Circular food systems create opportunities for local innovations and business opportunities.

Adopting a systemic innovation approach, implementing diverse innovation actions across nine real-life food chains, called Systemic Innovation Living Labs (ZeroW)

10. How can citizens be engaged and empowered to drive inclusive, transparent, participatory processes for urban transformations, ensuring synergies and complementarity with city councils?

  • Fostering experimentation and learning
  • Food Policy Councils can also be used in participatory processes  
  • Inclusive food systems

11.  Which experiences of urban communities to increase access to fresh food and healthy diets can inspire broader public policies?

Develop the Food Sharing Compass, a social innovation support platform for policy makers, food supply actors, researchers, and citizens and help these stakeholders to navigate food sharing landscapes and cultures to understand, develop, replicate, scale out and strengthen food sharing (Cultivate project)

 

The proposed scope is adequate especially in addressing  the impact of urban and peri-urban agriculture on food system.  

1). Butungo, S. (2013). Effects of Urban and Peri Urban Land Use Changes on Forest Ecosystem Services: The Case of Pugu and Kazimzumbwi Forest Reserves in Dar es Salaam and Kisarawe. Tanzania. Unpublished Masters Dissertation. Department of Urban and Regional Planning. Ardhi University. Dar es Salaam. Tanzania.

2).  Lupala, J. M. (2016). The effects of peri-urbanization on Pugu and Kazimzumbwi forest reserves, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Int. J. Phys. Hum. Geo3(2), 49-92.

 3). de Bruin, S. P., & Dengerink, J. (2020). The impact of urbanisation on food systems in west and East Africa: Opportunities to improve rural livelihoods. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.

4).  Toku, A., Osumanu, I. K., Owusu-Sekyere, E., & Amoah, S. T. (2021). Conflicting urban land uses at the fringes: issues and experiences of peri-urban farmers in an urbanizing city in Ghana. SN Social Sciences1, 1-23.