Community engagement for inclusive rural transformation and gender equality
Community engagement is now recognized as a critical component of international development practice and humanitarian assistance. It facilitates agency and the empowerment of all social groups in rural communities, enhances local participation, sustainability and ownership, and builds upon local resources and capacities, thereby leaving no one behind.
Recognizing the importance of community engagement as a key factor in achieving a world free from hunger and poverty, and as a prerequisite for community-led collective action, FAO organized a series of five webinars between 2020 and 2021 titled ‘Community Engagement Days.’[1] This created a space for academics, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), development and humanitarian agencies and field development practitioners to come together to explore the concept of community engagement, exchange experiences and good practices as well as challenges and opportunities to bring these approaches at scale.
The webinars provided an opportunity to share research and field experiences across five interlinked themes (gender, resilience, peace, evidence, and collective action), encouraging reflection and dialogue on community engagement strategies, practices and approaches. Nearly 1,000 participants from NGOs, governments, the United Nations (UN), international development organizations, civil society, the private sector, and academia joined the series.
Based on these conversations it became clear that while multiple definitions of community engagement exist – and there is no “one size fits all” – these definitions do share common approaches (community-led, rights-based, gender-responsive/gender-transformative); principles (inclusive, participatory and people-centered, conflict-sensitive) and characteristics (contextual and adaptive, and empowering). The key outcomes of the webinars highlighted the importance of recognizing and challenging power dynamics, integrating reflexivity in research and implementation, prioritizing gender equality, fostering resilience and peace, and supporting collective action. Furthermore, the need for systematic knowledge sharing and creating spaces for ongoing dialogue and peer-to peer learning was emphasized to enhance the effectiveness and sustainability of community-driven initiatives.
The Community Engagement Days webinar series was not a standalone initiative but a platform for discussion aimed at exchanging experiences, forging innovative alliances and partnerships to highlight the value of community engagement in both development and humanitarian contexts.
Given the scope of the series, the shared experiences were just a snapshot of existing approaches and practices. To provide an opportunity to expand the audience and hear voices from a variety of actors, the Rural Transformation and Gender Equality Division of FAO (ESP) initiated this call for submissions and invites stakeholders to share their experiences, good practices and views on community engagement for inclusive rural transformation and gender equality.[2]
This call for submissions is open to individuals and organizations from both the development and humanitarian sectors who have experience implementing community engagement strategies, interventions, approaches/methodologies, or innovations. It also welcomes contributions from a wide range of sectors, including agriculture, education, health, sanitation, civic engagement and others critical to inclusive rural development.
Through this initiative, FAO is eager to hear more, learn, and exchange insights both internally and externally on what interventions and practices have worked and what can be improved in community engagement and community-led collective action to achieve inclusive rural transformation and gender equality. By capturing a diverse range of contributions, FAO aims to promote the adoption and scaling-up of community engagement approaches, address barriers to their implementation and refine these practices to make them more inclusive, effective, and sustainable.
| Please use the submission template in any of the three languages (English, French or Spanish). The background document can serve as a reference for completing the template for submissions. |
The submissions will be publicly available on this webpage and featured in the proceedings report of this call, enhancing the visibility of participants' work and fostering learning, inspiration, and networking among a broader audience. Depending on the relevance and content, FAO may also include contributions in knowledge products such as case studies, compendiums, and reports, and use them to inform its work on community engagement and collective action, with due acknowledgment of the contributions. Beyond this call, the initiative offers participants the potential for continued engagement and collaboration, laying the groundwork for further learning, networking, and community-building.
Criteria for submissions
We are looking for ‘good practices’—tested methods that have proven successful in multiple settings and can be widely adopted. We also consider ‘promising practices’—innovative approaches that have shown success in a specific context and have the potential for broader application but may need more evidence or replication. Both types contribute valuable insights for continuous learning and improvement.
To ensure that relevant experiences are captured, we are looking for practices with the following criteria:
| 1. | Engagement of the community: Interventions should deliberately and actively strive to engage a wide range of segments and groups within the community to ensure inclusivity and broad-based participation, fostering a sense of ownership and collective empowerment among all community members, this should in turn strengthen community-led collective action. This means that they should go beyond merely targeting specific groups or formal structures, such as community-based organizations (farmer organizations, cooperatives, and self-help groups) as entry points. Instead, they should engage diverse groups within the community, fostering inclusivity, collective participation and shared benefits. These interventions promote a collective added value where everyone at the community level, regardless of their direct involvement, can benefit. Ideally, the community itself should be the primary entry point for the intervention, though approaches that indirectly impact the wider community are also welcome if they emphasize community value. Additionally, community-wide interventions do emphasize the participation of groups that are typically left behind. While these interventions are designed to be open to everyone, they are strategically inclusive by deliberately creating spaces and opportunities for marginalized or underserved groups to participate. |
| 2. | Inclusive and gender-responsive/transformative: The intervention should prioritize inclusivity, ensuring active engagement from all segments of the community, regardless of age, ethnicity, disability, gender identity/expression, etc. These efforts acknowledge that gender intersects with various social dimensions and identities, including age, ethnicity, indigeneity, health, psychological resilience, disability, socioeconomic and political status or other characteristics. This intersectionality creates compound inequalities and layers of disadvantage and privilege that the interventions aim to address, promoting greater inclusivity, equality, gender transformative change and positive masculinities.[3] This also involves challenging discriminatory gender social norms and unequal power dynamics and fostering attitudes and behaviors that support gender equality and women’s empowerment. |
| 3. | Rights-based and empowering: The intervention should aim for a process of change over an extended period, rather than relying on short-term or one-off activities such as workshops, trainings or consultations. It should adopt a rights-based approach[4], grounded in the principles of participation, inclusion, accountability, non-discrimination, transparency, human dignity, empowerment and agency. The intervention should position itself at the highest levels of participation (see Figure 1 below), promoting tailored and sustained engagement to achieve long-term impact. By enabling marginalized groups to influence decision-making and enhancing the capacity of individuals as rights holders to know and claim their rights, as well as ensuring that states and public authorities, as duty bearers, fulfill their obligations, accountability, impact, and sustainability can be strengthened. By recognizing and redressing structural inequalities, and by fostering the exchange and development of skills, knowledge, and confidence, community engagement enhances both practical abilities and inner resilience, ultimately contributing to sustainable development. |
| 4. | Self-facilitation and/or participatory facilitation: As a continuous and participatory process the intervention/experience can be self-facilitated by local actors from the outset, embodying bottom-up leadership, or it can be guided by an external facilitator who works closely with the community. The facilitation is focused on enhancing local stakeholders’ empowerment and ensuring their ownership and agency throughout the intervention and beyond (post-project), adopting a forward-looking approach. If the intervention is externally facilitated, facilitators should guide a participatory process that promotes community ownership and autonomy, allowing the intervention to be sustained independently after the project's conclusion. The most effective intervention facilitates the empowerment of the community to take full control, delegating authority, ensuring long-term impact. |
| 5. | Proven implementation: The intervention should either have been implemented or still be ongoing, and should incorporate learning processes throughout its execution. This includes lessons learned and results that can be shared or documented through this call. This knowledge can be generated in various ways, including local and generational knowledge, storytelling, and formal studies or evaluations. The intervention should showcase positive outcomes and lessons learned as well as challenges identified through both traditional and participatory methods. |
While FAO is particularly interested in approaches that specifically meet these criteria, we also recognize the value of methods used at specific phases of an intervention to ensure community engagement. This includes approaches for design and delivery processes or tools used for monitoring, evaluation and learning. Although the call acknowledges that meaningful engagement requires a participatory lens embedded throughout the entire planning and project cycle for higher outcomes and ownership, it is open to learning about tools and methods that support these goals at specific stages of an intervention/project.
Figure 1 Adapted from Pretty (1995), Arnstein (1969), International Association for Public Participation (IAP2), and White (1996). Figure 1 depicts various types of community participation, reflecting different levels of engagement in development interventions at community level. The progression goes from lower to higher levels of community engagement, but it does not prescribe a linear or hierarchical path. Instead, the figure offers a range of possible approaches to facilitate participation, tailored to the specific context and objectives of the intervention. As engagement deepens—from simply providing information to transferring decision-making power to the community— the community’s sense of empowerment and ownership over the process grows. Greater levels of engagement foster collective action, enhance accountability, and enable the community to take the lead in shaping their own development.
The call for submissions is open until 13 December 2024.
We thank participants in advance and look forward to learning from you!
Conveners:
- Lauren Phillips, Deputy Director, FAO - Rural Transformation and Gender Equality Division (ESP)
- Adriano Campolina, Senior Policy Officer, FAO - Rural Transformation and Gender Equality Division (ESP)
Co-facilitators:
- Christiane Monsieur, Project Coordinator, FAO - Rural Transformation and Gender Equality Division (ESP)
- Andrea Sánchez Enciso, Gender and Community Engagement Specialist, FAO - Rural Transformation and Gender Equality Division (ESP)
How to take part in this call for submissions:
To take part in this Call for submissions, please register to the FSN Forum, if you are not yet a member, or “sign in” to your account. Please review the topic note to understand the criteria we are considering for this call. If you wish to learn more about community engagement, you may refer to the background document. Once you have completed the submission template, upload it in the box “Post your contribution” on the call webpage, or, alternatively, send it to [email protected].
Please keep the length of submissions limited to 1,500 words and feel also free to attach relevant supporting materials.
[1] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2021, March 3). Tapping into community engagement for empowerment. FAO Flexible Multi-Partner Mechanism. https://www.fao.org/flexible-multipartner-mechanism/news/news-detail/en/c/1378190
[2] The call for submissions is directly aligned with the thematic components of collective action within FAO's Programme Priority Areas (PPAs), specifically Better Life 1 (Gender Equality and Rural Women’s Empowerment), Better Life 2 (Inclusive Rural Transformation) and Better Life 3 (Agriculture and Food Emergencies).
[3] A gender-transformative approach “seeks to actively examine, challenge and transform the underlying causes of gender inequalities rooted in discriminatory social institutions. As such, a gender transformative approach aims to address the unequal gendered power relations and discriminatory gender norms, attitudes, behaviours and practices, as well as discriminatory or gender-blind policies and laws, that create and perpetuate gender inequalities.” FAO, IFAD, WFP & CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform. 2023. Guidelines for measuring gender transformative change in the context of food security, nutrition and sustainable agriculture. Rome, FAO, IFAD, WFP and CGIAR. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc7940en
[4] A rights-based approach to community engagement emphasizes the fundamental human rights of all individuals, ensuring equal opportunities for everyone to claim and enjoy their human rights. Central to this is agency, the ability of individuals to define their own goals and act upon them. By promoting meaningful participation, accountability, non-discrimination, transparency, human dignity, empowerment and rule of law (‘PANTHER’ principles) this approach not only addresses power imbalances and systemic barriers but also fosters individual and collective agency.
Please read the article of FAO publications on this topic here.
专题
- 阅读 158 提交内容
This is a very relevant issue as community is the basis for sustainable development. Therefore, effective community participation approaches for development are very often prescribed by development actors. As of my observation, there are good lessons/progresses. But the main thing that should be given an emphasis is the equity participatory approach in any household management by household members. If this is done properly, the community level empowerment inclusive of gender would be an easy.
These practices and lessons from the IAMDP Jubraka cultivation in Sudan demonstrate the importance of community engagement in achieving inclusive rural transformation and gender equality:
Practice:
- Securing Food for Families: Planting nutritious vegetables and plants to ensure food security.
Experiences:
- Income Generation:
- Women manage and operate Jubrakas, growing a variety of crops such as vegetables, fruits, and cereals.
- These crops are sold in local markets, providing a steady source of income.
- Community Development:
- Women share their knowledge and skills with others, fostering a culture of learning and cooperation.
- Economic benefits from selling surplus produce are reinvested into community projects, such as building infrastructure or supporting local schools.
- Jubrakas promote sustainable agricultural practices and ensure food security, enhancing resilience against climate change.
Lessons Learned:
- Income Generation:
- Encouraging Jubraka production increases income opportunities for women through the sale of fresh and processed foods and seedlings.
- This economic empowerment enhances women’s decision-making roles and social status.
- Food Processing and Preservation:
- Implementing food processing, preservation, and value addition technologies extends the shelf life of produce, ensuring food security during dry seasons.
- This approach can be replicated to improve family nutrition and satisfaction.
- Knowledge Management:
- Developing knowledge management products to track food consumption patterns and nutritional values helps identify ways to leverage food processing for maximum nutritional benefits.
- This data-driven approach guides future interventions.
- Digital Information Systems:
- Utilizing technology to communicate with participants via SMS or other digital platforms provides ongoing support and information on nutrition.
- Enhances the effectiveness of agricultural practices.
Dear Andrea
Thank you for initiating such an insightful and inspiring conversation. The examples shared so far highlight the transformative power of inclusive, community-led approaches to rural development and gender equality. I’d like to contribute by sharing an approach we've been exploring in Kaduna State, Nigeria, which focuses on integrating community health, environmental sustainability, and gender empowerment.
The Initiative: 'One Baby, Ten Trees'
This initiative ties maternal and infant health to environmental sustainability. For every baby born within the participating communities, we plant ten trees. This not only helps offset carbon emissions but also strengthens the community's sense of ownership and responsibility toward climate action.
Core Challenges Addressed
The initiative addresses:
- Maternal and Child Health: Limited access to healthcare and low antenatal care attendance.
- Environmental Degradation: Deforestation and its impact on rural livelihoods.
- Gender Inequality: Limited recognition of women’s contributions to community welfare and environmental stewardship.
Stakeholders and Their Roles
- Community Birth Attendants (CBAs): Trained local women serve as referral agents, guiding pregnant women to healthcare facilities for antenatal visits and safe delivery. CBAs also help identify high-risk cases, build trust within the community, and address cultural barriers that prevent women from accessing healthcare services.
- Local Governments and NGOs: Provide resources, support training, and ensure alignment with regional maternal health and environmental goals.
- Community Members: Actively participate in tree-planting activities and ensure the survival of planted trees, fostering a sense of collective responsibility.
This multistakeholder involvement fosters shared responsibility, ensures sustainability, and addresses health and environmental challenges.
Inclusivity and Gender Equality
We’ve embedded gender equality through:
- Empowering Women as CBAs: Women are trained, recognized, and rewarded, strengthening their roles as community leaders and healthcare advocates.
- Intersectional Approach: Inclusion of vulnerable groups, such as almajiri boys (street children), in educational and vocational activities tied to the program.
Lessons Learned
- Flexibility is Key: Adapting the initiative to different cultural and environmental contexts enhances acceptance and impact.
- Community Ownership is Non-Negotiable: When communities see direct benefits, such as improved health and income from tree-based products, their engagement deepens.
- Referral Systems Save Lives: CBAs focusing on referring pregnant women to healthcare facilities rather than providing direct medical care ensure that women receive the highest standards of professional care.
- Partnerships Amplify Impact: Collaborating with local and international NGOs ensures access to technical expertise and funding.
Why This Approach Adds Value
By aligning community priorities (health and livelihood) with global goals (climate action and gender equality), we’ve observed increased buy-in and sustainability. The referral-focused role of CBAs has also significantly increased antenatal care attendance, reduced maternal and infant mortality, and strengthened the healthcare system's outreach.
This initiative exemplifies how leveraging collective action can create a ripple effect of positive change across multiple sectors while ensuring that maternal and child health remains a top priority.
I hope this perspective enriches the discussion and sparks ideas for new synergies.
Looking forward to engaging further!
Best regards,
Salahuddeen Mohammed Shitu
Independent Consultant
Kaduna State, Nigeria
Good afternoon, congratulations for this work.
I am enclosing an experience we have had in Spain.
Thank you very much for all the work done.
Best regards
A flower can decorate a space. Or it can be used in gastronomy. The project consists precisely in transforming ornamental flowers into edible flowers. Their composition makes them suitable for inclusion in the diet: they are rich in antioxidants and fiber, have a low sugar content and contain no fat. There are two ways to consume this product: fresh or dehydrated / freeze-dried (in both processes the water is removed, although using different techniques). When consumed fresh, the flowers have a short shelf life. If they are subjected to a dehydration or freeze-drying process, the flowers retain their properties for a longer period of time. It is precisely these preservation techniques that constitute the innovative feature of this work, as far as its scientific aspect is concerned.
The project posed some challenges. It was necessary to improve the germination process, as well as to carry out tests with the small amounts of product available: since plants are composed mainly of water, little matter remains after dehydration. An organoleptic analysis (related to sensory characteristics) was also carried out, using a tasting panel, to make a detailed description of the product.
The name “Inclusive flower” refers to the social component of the initiative: once developed, the flower production process was transferred and scaled to the special employment center of the Valora2 Foundation, located in the city of Palencia and dedicated to the inclusion of people with disabilities. Therefore, it was necessary to adapt the procedures, as well as the terminology and pace of work, so that the production could be carried out by non-specialized personnel.
Preserving and developing shea parks: a sustainable solution to the sector's problems
This predominantly female sector (more than 8 million women are involved in the sector in West Africa) represents on average nearly 12% of total rural household income, and contributes up to 32% of the financial resources available to women. However, the shea industry is under increasing pressure from human activity, with trees being cut down for firewood, and deforestation by felling and bulldozing to make land suitable for cultivation or even construction.
Faced with the urgency of these challenges, 7 cooperatives in Mali and Burkina Faso involved in the EQUITE program in the organic and fair trade certified shea sector are organizing themselves and looking for solutions to sustainably preserve the resource and guarantee its quality.
Drawing on agro-ecological farming practices identified in their cooperatives or networks (notably through exchanges between cooperatives on national fair trade platforms and in the sub-region), and in consultation with local agricultural and rural development stakeholders, the cooperatives have chosen to develop and protect shea parks as a strategy to meet the economic, environmental and social challenges facing the sector.
This strategy is based on multi-stakeholder concertation and mobilization, creating spaces for collective and individual dialogue and discussion to identify levers for the development and protection of shea parks: farmers and herders, local communities, youth associations, territorial authorities, decentralized environmental and agricultural services (including Eaux et Forêts), customary authorities and traditional practitioners have mobilized to develop and protect shea parks.
Developing shea parks involves identifying and selecting the park to be developed, training cooperative members and mobilizing the community to carry out collective work.
The identification of the park to be developed is done in consultation with the various stakeholders: producers, cooperative members and non-members, herders, local community members, traditional and public authorities, agricultural and environmental services. Management cannot be carried out without the agreement of the various stakeholders, hence the need for dialogue, consultation and awareness-raising sessions. This is all the more important when development work precedes the securing of the park.
Training is provided either by a trainer directly to the members of the cooperative, or by endogenous facilitators or relay farmers who have been trained and are responsible for delivering the training. The cooperatives have also been able to call on external trainers, notably from the Water and Forestry Department and the Regional Environment Directorate.
Community development work takes place over several days, mobilizing men and women according to a schedule agreed with the stakeholders. Different agroecological practices are implemented, depending on the needs of the park to be developed: Assisted natural regeneration, stone cordon, pruning and grafting and agroforestry.
Securing the park is the subject of a consultation process involving all the stakeholders concerned by life in and around the park. The aim is to find a compromise that will guarantee the protection of a shea harvesting area from anthropic pressures (logging, deforestation for agricultural purposes, contamination by synthetic chemical inputs used in nearby crops) and from animal roaming. Secure parks generally have a buffer zone that communities can use for human, agricultural and livestock activities. The secured zone is the subject of official documents that guarantee shea nut collectors living alongside the parks secure access to the resource for an average of 15 years, while defining the rules for management and exploitation:
- Usufrut contract: a harvesting agreement between the PO and the Chantier or Unité d'Aménagement Forestier (UAF or CAF) or the local management committee responsible for managing the forest;
- The “cahier des charges”, which is the participatory definition of the rules governing forest use and the commitment of the various users to respect these rules.
- The Five-Year Management Plan, which commits the PO to seeking funding for forest management projects to compensate for logging and ensure the sustainability of the forest and its resources.
These documents are approved by the relevant local authorities, such as the Regional Environment Directorates. Not all the parks developed under the EQUITE 2 program have been secured (of the 30 parks developed, 16 have been secured), so securing is studied on a case-by-case basis with stakeholders.
Focus on securing the NUNUNA Federation's shea parks in Burkina Faso
Through the EQUITE 2 program, the Nununa federation was able to secure 3 shea parks in the communes of Léo, Sapouy and Boura, by mobilizing various local authorities, namely traditional leaders, members of the Village Development Council (CVD), village councillors and women's groups, forest management site managers (CAF) and forest management unions (UGGF). The process culminated in an operating agreement authorizing the use of the park by the women collectors, and the drawing up of specifications and a five-year plan for future development and maintenance. A management committee has been set up for each park. In all, 1,800 shea trees have benefited from RNA, pruning and grafting, 40 km of firebreaks have been erected, and 200 m buffer zones installed between the parks and the fields.
In the attached document (in french), you can find out more about the development of shea parks, particularly in terms of economic spin-offs, the long-term participatory approach, the impact on agricultural cooperatives, the effects on environmental protection, the sustainability factors identified and the challenges involved in setting up the parks.
I am pleased to submit my contribution for the FAO initiative on Community Engagement for Inclusive Rural Transformation and Gender Equality. This input highlights practical approaches and strategies that align with the initiative's goals of promoting gender equality and empowering rural communities.
Please let me know if additional details or clarifications are needed. I am eager to collaborate further to support FAO’s impactful work.
女士 Diksha Srivastava
I am submitting an article to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) titled Awareness and Adoption of Jan Aushadhi Suvidha Sanitary Napkins in Bihar, India. This article explores how affordable sanitary napkins, introduced under the Jan Aushadhi initiative, have improved menstrual hygiene management among rural women. Aligning with the theme Community Engagement for Inclusive Rural Transformation and Gender Equality, the study emphasizes the role of grassroots awareness campaigns in breaking menstrual taboos and promoting health equity. By highlighting the community’s involvement in adopting cost-effective solutions, the article underscores the transformative potential of inclusive practices in fostering gender equality in rural areas.
I share how We Effect has worked with Savings and loaning groups. Quoted here is a report in which We Effect documents the methodology, implementation, adaptations, case stories and areas which could benefit from further work. The report is titled, "Village Savings and Loaning Associations as a corner stone for women's rights and community development".
The community engagement cannot be achieved unless powers of decision making for their areas and improving their quality of life are delegated to the villages through the local self government. For the transformation the first entry point is to bring in change in the governance by ensuring formation of local administrative units that are provided with untied funds to bring in the change in infrastructure and involve the community in decision making process for setting priorities, identifying social evils/practices that need to be changed. This brings in not just empowerment but also effective execution. In this system of local governance, successfully reserving the seats to women to extend of 30-50% has been transformative in not just women getting involved with active participation but then the priorities and issues also address to resolve with perspective of women.
Mahatma Gandhi advocated strongly shift to local self governance model in rural areas as the foundation to the political system. The emphasis is on decentralized form of government as the local are best equipped to identify, prioritize, and effectively get stakeholders to resolve the issues. This is ‘village governance model’ the ‘Gram Swaraj’.
In India Lord Ripon, as Viceroy realized the diversity and local issues cannot be resolved with centralized policy making brought in reforms for introduction of local self government in the British India for the counties, municipalities, cities, group of villages. All these directly worked with the districts that also had delegation of powers.
Community engagement can be formalized as has been done in India in the local self government system ‘Panchayati Raj’ by the constitutional amendment to ensure local governance with minimum 30% of seats of elected members to women. Besides these representatives each of the expenditure and all approvals are taken in village assembly- the community participation called ‘Gram Sabha”. On date now that there has been churn of 4 elections on average in each of the state, the women leaders have emerged and contesting in many unreserved seats as well. Local Self Government is the management of local affairs by local bodies who have been elected by the local people. The local self-Government includes both rural and urban government. Rural Local Governments: Panchayati Raj Institution (PRI) is a system of rural local self-government in India.
This formalized arrangement is producing the leadership as they have experienced and participated in financial decision making as well as to understand the nuances and also bring on table the social concerns of their villages in the Panchayat. These transformations are done from a grant that is untied fund, enabling them to plan and execute. The resultant in good governed states has resulted in quality infrastructure bringing down the incidents of malaria and gastro related issues. The enrollment and learning in schools have improved as teachers monitoring is done by the local government and same applies to local health staff etc. The holistic approach to infrastructure along with safe drinking water and sanitation helps more and more involvement of women.
Even technical knowledge of agriculture or any business processing is sought from experts improving their opportunity for sustainable livelihood opportunities and improving their quality of life. All of this is the community participation in terms of formation of self help groups focusing to improve their livelihood opportunities by having dairy, construction material business, home making food items etc. Women are now also trained in digital payments and e commerce. The base of transformation is delegating decision making to the communities themselves for the infrastructure and livelihood opportunities.
The need is to make this as the established practice across the globe adapting the lessons learnt in India experiment for the community engagement through delegation of powers for local governance supplemented by the requisite funding. The barriers for inclusiveness, being vocal of their needs , participation in financial dealings and more so for education of their children and hygiene enables to create concrete small steps of success to absorb the abstract concepts like empowerment and change of mindset of women themselves and the community. That can be further supplemented, with appropriate training and skilling to fill the gaps and thus it is tailored and better targeted to the local relevance than generic interventions. The community and especially women plays vital role in the vulnerable group as she is major deciding factor as to what goes on the plate, not just calories but a nutritious diet using the traditional inputs grown in locality needs the focus and skill them to cook in nutritious manner using the ingredients what they have access and can afford. This to be supplemented by hygienic habitats infrastructure that comes from the state investment, but quality is to be monitored by the community.
The developed economies and developing economies across globe have good practices by embracing two types of “local self-government.” One is the Anglo-Saxon- styled “self-government of the people” or “self-government of the civilians” based on parliamentary sovereignty and popular sovereignty; the other one is the peoples group. Countries like the Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden strongly established the local self government. The Nordic Countries have demonstrated not just better governance but also enabled more and more women leadership even as head of the countries.
Thus, the entry point is the mechanism of community and women participation in the local self government to achieve the objective of Community engagement for the inclusive rural transformation ensuring the gender equality. The holistic approach holds the key. The silo approach in just organizing women for a single activity many a times collapse the moment handholding is stopped. The intension has to be sustainable mechanism to ensure involvement of community and participation of women in decision making and that will be sustainable and more result oriented. The community will witness small successes and women will be elated of their issues taking prominence resulting in better decision making.
The resultant is the more and more participation of women at all levels of governance and more sensitivity towards the concerns of food, nutrition, and education. Thus, the model is not new, it is important for FAO to bring the concept center stage to ensure better participation in decision making at local levels and women fulfilling their long standing needs. More than 88 countries have legislated gender quotas at the local elections to form the decision making administrative body at the village levels. The empirical evidence shows the better inclusive decision making and women taking active roles.
Thus, to ensure improvement in quality of life of households with combined decision making for collective betterment is ensured by delegation of governance equipped with the powers and making the local self government accountable to ensure the same. Now technology has enabled data based decision making with precision and not just blind policy making or investing. The efforts are also for better monitoring of interventions on real time basis than awaiting impact studies, enables quick course correction.
The SDG target of gender parity can be accelerated by focusing on more and more delegation to the local self government and ensuring valid participation by women in the process. The impact assessment of SDG, as on date have also demonstrated that countries that resorted to women’s representation in local government and ensuring participation with embedded authority.FAO need to strategize to hand hold by enabling the lagging countries to have legislation for women participation in local governments and delegating sufficient powers to them if SDG by 2030 is not to become a rhetoric. The hand holding be focused on these changes to ensure community participation with gender parity.
Community led collective action is also more impactful and also sustainable for social evils and practices. That transformation enables them to flag, eradicate and ensures more and more participation. Women leadership empirical evidence of better community participation-Having female leaders in positions of influence to serve as role models is not only critical to the career advancement of women.