Lebanon
Country introduction:
Recognizing the importance of preserving its biological diversity and natural resources, Lebanon has ratified the CBD in 1994 and the CPB in 2013. The country developed its National Biodiversity Strategy in 1998 and National Biosafety Framework in 2005. A draft decree to implement the provisions of the CPB in Lebanon was developed by the Ministry of Environment in 2005. It has proposed the establishment of a National Biosafety Committee which includes representatives from all concerned institutions. The decree is not endorsed yet and the interim measures of the National Biosafety Framework are still not in place to minimize risks to the environment and human health that might emerge from applications of modern biotechnology. However, actual implemented national laws, decrees and regulations aiming to regulate agricultural products, human and animal safety, food safety and environment and biodiversity, are indirectly related to biosafety issues and GM products. Thus, the sanitary and phytosanitary measures law (Law 778-2006), intending to update its legal aspects to meet the requirements set by the WTO, bans the importation of GM seeds and seedlings that may introduce new diseases and toxins into the country (Article 14).
Moreover, the food safety law (Law 35-2015) involving Ministry of Public Health, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Industry, Ministry of Economy and Trade proposes the establishment of the Food Safety Lebanese Commission (FSLC) (Article 22), and states that Ministry of Agriculture in coordination with FSLC will set the standards that should be met by GM foods (Article 19). The political situation in Lebanon is still hindering the implementation of the food safety law and therefore the GM food safety assessment is not yet a priority. In a recent development, however, the first Board of Commission was officially appointed by Decision No. 50, dated 24 October 2025. The Commission will operate within a public–private partnership framework, promoting structured collaboration between public authorities and private sector stakeholders to ensure the implementation, enforcement, and oversight of the highest food safety standards in Lebanon.
On the other hand, Lebanon has given a great attention to strengthening human resources and developing the institutional and infrastructural capacities to be able to cope with new developments and applications of modern biotechnology. In this context, concrete efforts have been undertaken by the American University of Science and Technologies (AUST) in order to ensure the implementation of the CPB in the country through setting up of a GMO testing facility. Assigned by the Ministry of Trade and Economy, the AUST laboratory has been working over years on the development and optimization of validated protocols for GMO analysis covering detection, identification and quantification of GMO. The laboratory acquired the ISO 17025 accreditation for GMO analysis in 2011. The accreditation was renewed in 2015 and is currently undergoing its third renewal cycle. Comprehensive analyses have been conducted on a broad range of samples, including food, feed and seeds, as well as the development of a cost-effective testing strategy to face the challenges of GMOs diversity. Moreover, Lebanon is currently preparing the Fifth National Report under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.
Recognizing the importance of preserving its biological diversity and natural resources, Lebanon has ratified the CBD in 1994 and the CPB in 2013. The country developed its National Biodiversity Strategy in 1998 and National Biosafety Framework in 2005. A draft decree to implement the provisions of the CPB in Lebanon was developed by the Ministry of Environment in 2005. It has proposed the establishment of a National Biosafety Committee which includes representatives from all concerned institutions. The decree is not endorsed yet and the interim measures of the National Biosafety Framework are still not in place to minimize risks to the environment and human health that might emerge from applications of modern biotechnology. However, actual implemented national laws, decrees and regulations aiming to regulate agricultural products, human and animal safety, food safety and environment and biodiversity, are indirectly related to biosafety issues and GM products. Thus, the sanitary and phytosanitary measures law (Law 778-2006), intending to update its legal aspects to meet the requirements set by the WTO, bans the importation of GM seeds and seedlings that may introduce new diseases and toxins into the country (Article 14).
Moreover, the food safety law (Law 35-2015) involving Ministry of Public Health, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Industry, Ministry of Economy and Trade proposes the establishment of the Food Safety Lebanese Commission (FSLC) (Article 22), and states that Ministry of Agriculture in coordination with FSLC will set the standards that should be met by GM foods (Article 19). The political situation in Lebanon is still hindering the implementation of the food safety law and therefore the GM food safety assessment is not yet a priority. In a recent development, however, the first Board of Commission was officially appointed by Decision No. 50, dated 24 October 2025. The Commission will operate within a public–private partnership framework, promoting structured collaboration between public authorities and private sector stakeholders to ensure the implementation, enforcement, and oversight of the highest food safety standards in Lebanon.
On the other hand, Lebanon has given a great attention to strengthening human resources and developing the institutional and infrastructural capacities to be able to cope with new developments and applications of modern biotechnology. In this context, concrete efforts have been undertaken by the American University of Science and Technologies (AUST) in order to ensure the implementation of the CPB in the country through setting up of a GMO testing facility. Assigned by the Ministry of Trade and Economy, the AUST laboratory has been working over years on the development and optimization of validated protocols for GMO analysis covering detection, identification and quantification of GMO. The laboratory acquired the ISO 17025 accreditation for GMO analysis in 2011. The accreditation was renewed in 2015 and is currently undergoing its third renewal cycle. Comprehensive analyses have been conducted on a broad range of samples, including food, feed and seeds, as well as the development of a cost-effective testing strategy to face the challenges of GMOs diversity. Moreover, Lebanon is currently preparing the Fifth National Report under the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.
Regulatory framework:
My country is in the process in developing a regulatory framework that requires the competent authority to conduct safety assessment of GM food.
Structure for GM food safety assessment:
My country is in the process in developing a structure for GM food safety assessment.
Supplemental information (regulatory framework):
Issued in 2015, the Food Safety Law 35-2015 involves the Ministries of Public Health, Agriculture, Industry, Economy and Trade. Article 22 proposes the establishment of the Food Safety Lebanese Commission (FSLC); Article 19 states that Ministry of Agriculture in coordination with FSLC will set the standards which should be met by GM foods.
Relevant contact details:
As a recent institutional development, the first Board of the Food Safety Lebanese Commission (FSLC) was formally appointed by Decision No. 50 of 24 October 2025.
GM food safety assessment guidelines:
My country does not conduct safety assessment of GM food but the country has, or the country is in the process of developing national/regional guidelines that are in line with the Codex Guidelines in conducting safety assessment of GM food.
Conduct of GM food safety assessment:
My country has never conducted food safety assessment of GM food but is planning to conduct such assessment in the near future.
Supplemental information (assessment):
Regulation stacked events:
The country is in the process of developing relevant policies on assessment of stacked events, or there is no specific regulation on stacked events.
Supplemental information (stacked events):
GM food/feed production:
My country does not produce any GM food or feed.
GM food/feed imports:
My country may import GM food or feed and there is no authorization process.
Supplemental information (production and trade):
LLP/AP incidents:
My country has not faced any LLP/AP situations in the last 10 years.
Supplemental information (LLP/AP incidents):
Labelling requirement:
My country allows a voluntary and positive/negative labeling on GM food.
Supplemental information (labelling requirement):
Relevant links:
Upload relevant documents: