The Forest and Landscape Restoration Mechanism
Contact points
Please provide: name, e-mail and phone
Organization / Institution
Name of the instrument
Link to the instrument
Abstract
Please provide a brief description of the tool (200 words maximum)
Type of instrument
Guidelines or other normative tools
Methodology or approach
Web-based tool for data collection
GIS/Remote Sensing data
Ground based collection of data
Modelling results
Literature survey
Repository of data and information
Illustrative knowledge product (good practices, case studies...)
Please tick where suitable
Name of the project(s)/programme(s) in which this instrument is implemented
Ongoing partnerships
FAO
Governments
Academia
Development partners
Donors
International NGOs
National NGOs
Other
Other
Scope of the instrument
Actions against deforestation and land degradation
Forest and Landscape Restoration (FLR)
Sustainable Land Management (SLM)
Integrated Landscape Management (ILM)
Scale of the instrument
Farm / Household / forest management unit (FMU)
Microcatchment
Landscape
Subnational
National
Regional / International
Global
Land use system
Agroforestry
Cropland
Forest
Rangeland
Other
Other
Dimensions monitored / tracked by the instrument
Biophysical features (climate, soil, water, geomorphology...)
Ecological features (vegetation, fauna, biodiversity, ecosystem services...)
Socio-economic features (livelihoods, nutrition, capacities/human capital...)
Management
Governance and participation
Product / output of the instrument
Please, 50 words maximum

Overall ranking of the instrument

Upscaling potential of the instrument (i.e. can the use of the instrument be easily generalized)
1 – small potential to be upscaled, to 5- high potential to be upscaled
Sustainability of the instrument (over time, i.e. will the instrument be easily re-used in the future)
1 – difficult to maintain over time, to 5 – easy to maintain over time
Target users of the instrument
Local communities
Technical staff / Experts
Project managers (NGOs, development partners,...)
Policy makers
Donors
Please select 3 options maximum
Main steps in using the instrument
Please, use steps: Step 1, Step 2,.... (150 words maximum)

Data collection

Existence of data: (1 – yes, full data coverage to 5 – no data coverage, all to be collected)
Accessibility of data: (1 – data easily available, e.g. online to 5 – no data available)
Cost of data: (1 – free data, to 5 – very expensive data)
Quality of data according to the Kyoto protocol (1 – Tier 1, 3– tier 2, 5 – Tier 3)
Method used for disseminating the instrument
Website
Knowledge products (methodologies, case studies, maps...)
Workshops
Trainings
On-site follow-up
Main challenges in implementing the instrument and their description
Political buy in
Data collection
Human capacities
Onsite technical capacities
Financial resources
Other
Please, select 3 options maximum
Other
Main opportunities and foreseen future developments
Please, 100 words maximum
Potential opportunities for collaboration foreseen within FAO
Please, 50 words maximum
Describe how this instrument is used or could be used to support monitoring the SDGs or other commitments
Please, 100 words maximum