Responsible Business Conduct (RBC) in Agriculture

Globalization has greatly impacted our food system. Today, supermarkets commonly feature cocoa from West Africa, cashews from southeast Asia, or avocados from Latin America. Reduced trade barriers, advances in production, logistics, and a rising demand for agricultural products have powered trade and global supply chains. While positive for economic growth, increased business can also have adverse impacts on people and the environment, including sourcing communities. Recently, several governments have introduced legislation to mitigate the adverse environmental and social impacts of agricultural supply chains by requiring companies to establish mandatory risk-based due diligence systems. In some cases, the request for regulation on RBC came from companies themselves. In better controlling adverse impacts, agricultural enterprises can lower the possibility of harm through their sourcing, business operations and suppliers, while directing better development outcomes. Owing to the dominant position of agriculture in most developing economies, FAO’s portfolio on RBC is rooted in development and inclusive growth. FAO works with businesses, governments and all stakeholders to create viable solutions and set benchmarks for progress in RBC, in line with sector best practices, driving sustainability across the agricultural value chain.
Connecting risk and development through responsible agricultural supply chains

FAO’s activities on RBC build on various resources including the  OECD-FAO Guidance for Responsible Agricultural Supply Chains, the global standard for addressing risk and development in the agricultural sector. The OECD-FAO Guidance was launched in 2016, designed jointly by FAO and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) following a three-year process guided by a multi-stakeholder advisory group. Several governments around the world have since recognized the OECD-FAO Guidance as part of their policy frameworks linking investment, enterprise, agriculture and development. For example, SwitzerlandJapanFrance and the United Kingdom are some of the FAO Members that integrate the OECD-FAO Guidance as part of their RBC policies, programmes and reference tools for due diligence in the agricultural sector. In May 2024, the Council of the European Union adopted the Directive on Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence, which requires certain companies in all 27 European Union Member States to conduct environmental and social due diligence. The Directive lists agriculture as a high-impact sector, with reference to the OECD-FAO Guidance as the sector due diligence standard.

The  OECD-FAO Guidance outlines how companies can better manage risks and development outcomes in their supply chains by establishing due diligence systems and encouraging multi-stakeholder cooperation. Sourcing responsibly involves a focused approach to tackling business and human rights, climate change and the environment - understanding how impacts can occur along supply and value chains. The OECD-FAO Guidance illustrates how such challenges can be pronounced in developing economies and interlink with structural development challenges. Key topic areas include labour rights, animal welfare, land tenure rights, environmental protection and natural resource depletion (including water scarcity and deforestation), food security, child labour, indigenous rights, among many other risk and development issues.

Publication available in: 
Arabic | Chinese | English | French | German | Indonesian | ItalianJapaneseMyanmar |Polish |Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Ukrainian | Vietnamese

A translation of the Guidance in Croatian, commissioned by the Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development of Croatia, is also available here.

Why Responsible Business Conduct (RBC) in Agriculture?
Increasingly, companies recognize that they have a responsibility and role in sustainable development. From large agricultural multinational enterprises to upstream and downstream suppliers, such as traders, cooperatives, farmers, retailers and others, adverse impacts from business can have lasting effects on people in different commodity sourcing communities around the world. Integrating considerations that address poverty and labour standards, while ensuring that trade is inclusive of all types of businesses and countries, including small-scale farmers in least developed countries, requires concerted effort from many actors. By focusing on RBC in their value chains – and factoring in social and environmental considerations in their business models – enterprises can drive positive development and make a focused contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), while lowering impacts on their own financial bottom lines.


Did you know?
Child labour in agriculture

Over 70 percent of child labour takes place in the agricultural sector (FAO, 2020), a reality which supply chains and businesses in agriculture can impact directly through business operations or indirectly through outsourcing activities to different suppliers.

Agriculture and GHG emissions

Agriculture, forestry and other land use accounts for around 20-25 percent of all greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (FAO, 2020), where emissions caused by suppliers –known as scope 3 emissions – require concerted efforts from lead companies to drive due diligence and reduce carbon footprints across the supply chain.

Agriculture and water use

Agriculture accounts for approximately 70 percent of freshwater resources, particularly through irrigation (OECD, 2021); significant efforts are required to help agricultural enterprises and their suppliers in reducing their water footprint and mitigating impacts on communities and the environment.

Food security

In 2019, nearly 750 million persons suffered from severe food insecurity – or nearly one in ten people in the world (FAO, 2020); without proper planning, business conduct in many regions can result in salient impacts and lead to instances such as overcropping, which can take away from staple foods and influence food availability

Investing to end hunger

An estimated additional annual investment in the range of about USD 39 to 50 billion is needed globally to end hunger and poverty by 2030 (ZEF and FAO, 2020). Investments that promote sustainable and resilient agricultural production, while applying responsible business conduct (RBC) and risk-based due diligence, can help reduce rural poverty, reach vulnerable groups and address key sector bottlenecks.



FAO’s role in Responsible Business Conduct (RBC)

FAO plays a leading role in the global dialogue on responsible business conduct (RBC), developing initiatives, strategies and tools to help foster inclusive development for governments while working interactively with business, NGOs and others. FAO collaborates with various partners in addressing RBC in agriculture, including the OECD Centre for Responsible Business Conduct through the OECD-FAO Guidance and a joint communication and implementation workplan. At FAO, our work drives several streams that feed into RBC from different thematic perspectives according to the extensive risk and development base of issues governing agricultural enterprises and development. Our work on RBC reflects the main principles of FAO’s Private Sector Strategy and is part of the CFS-RAI  Umbrella Programme Supporting Responsible Investments in Agriculture and Food Systems. It is interlinked with the major work streams of FAO including:

Events
Agricultural Sustainability Days 2025 | 18 - 20 November 2025

The Agricultural Sustainability Days 2025 will bring together representatives from governments, the private sector, and producer organizations to share experiences and strengthen collaboration on responsible and resilient agrifood supply chains.

Highlights
Feature: The OECD-FAO Guidance is a feature framework in the EU Farm to Fork Strategy’s Code of Conduct for Responsible Business and Marketing Practices

See also
Contact

Responsible Business Conduct (RBC) in Agriculture

[email protected]