Agroecology has been defined based on three interdependent dimensions: as a practice, as a scientific approach, and as a social movement. As a social practice, it is expressed in the various ways in which peasant family farming and indigenous and traditional peoples and communities organize their work for the diversified production of food and other agricultural products. This is accomplished through cooperative processes developed in close interaction with ecological and socio-cultural dynamics of the territories in which they take root. By using systemic and participatory approaches, agroecology articulates frontier knowledge based on different scientific disciplines combined with popular biocultural knowledge. 

This article, which is a part of the three-part series, by Agroecology Now pushes back against the arguments often made against agroecology. It engages with the language used to critique agroecology and reverse it to articulate these as critical resources for social transformation. The article also presents the case for agroecology as the alternative model to prevent the looming collapse focusing on the Brazilian situation as a case in point.