Rachel Zedeck
| Organization | Backpack Farm | Kenya |
|---|---|
| Organization type | Private Sector (Commercial Companies) |
| Country | Kenya |
Rachel Zedeck if the Founder and Managing Director of the Backpack Farm Agriculture Program (BPF), an internationally recognized social enterprise with a mission to "grow 1 million+ smallholder farmers out of poverty."
With a unique approach to training, rural distribution and finance, they were the first commercial enterprise to launch mobile training in Kenya and continue to expand the program with a more advanced mobile application. Most recently, the Backpack Farm was named a finalist for the Katerva Award honoring the best groundbreaking ideas on the planet with the ability to make the planet a healthier and more sustainable place by reaching scale.
This member participated in the following Forums
Forum Communication for Development, community media and ICTs for family farming and rural development
Question 3 (opens 26 September)
Hello from Kenya / Afghanistan
Enna.. yes, we all love the idea of apps and cost can be a challenge but so is the cost of both the smart phone and internet access needed to download them. So my 2 cents....
1. Literacy is still a real challenge especially in arid / semi arid regions where cultures have been more isolated to commercial farming. Classic content via sms may not be the best option unlike IVT etc... And even if they are semi-literate, most of them speak a local dialect that may not support immediate knowledge transfer in the classical form of their "mother" tongue. I found this to be especially true here in East Africa where Swahili is the official language but very few farmers speak classic Swahili and instead speak a bleneded form with their tribal language. So ... this may just be lumped into the feedback Marina gave on "language barrier."
2. Privacy ....This is still a REAL challenge for women especially in markets where they have very little personal privacy, let alone choiice or access to their own or the family's mobile phone.
3. Investment .... That's right. There needs to be more private secor investment. Of course content is a challenge but so is the lack of agreements to reduce the costs Telcos can charge because I have seen some mercenary charges being passed through. To make any model financially self-sustainable, these charges must be absorbed.
4. Sticky content & National campaigns ... Good technical informaiton / advice should be coupled with campaigns from national Ministries . Working in a vaccum doesn't create any stickiness within rural communities.
A little food for thought
Rachel
Question 2 (opens 24 September)
Alberto ... Hallelujah ! More than changing the behavior of rural / smallholder farmers, we need to change our own behavior and set realistic expectations on any ICT tool, especially when many of them have been designed with a limited commercial approach.
But as many projects / tools continue to focus on production, we ignore "access to market." As farmers quality and yields increase, many continue to struggle to generate significantly more income because no one bothered to engage the commercial marekt. Even if farmers want to attract new buyers, they don't yet have these skills or just the simple financial or technical capacity to move their crops to wholesale buyers.
I am especially frustrated with schemes planning to export their products but havden't taken into account the need for food safety certifications like Global GAP, required by the EU. But even crash crops like coffee, tea and cotton require safe production and many buyers now require better traceability. So more than just pushing contnet, we need to be able to pull data from farmers. Along these lines, both Grameen and ESOKO have done some interesting work but am still unsure of both the potential for their financial self-sustainabilty and growth.
Forum e-Agriculture: looking back and moving forward
Question 1 (opens 25 Nov.) What are the main achievements in the area of ICT for agriculture and rural development...
We used HCD to both design and test our m-agri tools with great success. And in East Africa, youth is often legally defined as under the age of 35 so should we define "youth" or create a baseluien ?
Yes, illiteracy eems to be hold on as the classic argument for why technology won' tbe successful but even if a country' illiteracy rate is 50%, that doesn't necessarily mean they have no reading ability. I also think the illiteracy argument discounts community driven (human centered design) models which mean that communities are learning cooperatively not sitting alone in the dark. This approach could be especially effective within multi-generational models. Both East Africa and Afghanistan have some of the largest youth populations in the world who are at the very least semi-literate and serve as conduit for information transfer.
(HI Meg!!!) And as Meg rightly mentions, there are different delivery methods such as IVR and video. As costs of delivery decrease, these education methods have the potential to demosntrate greater impact but only if developed for larger scale adoption.
Rachel
Can you expand on your thoughts looking for weather station programs ? There are multiple programs in East and Southern Africa trialing the use of weather stations and crop insurance enabled with mobile outeach and payment.
IF nothing else, I think the great achievement is that we have begun to see rural agriculture communities aka FARMERS as both producers and consumers instead of potential aid recipients. I believe until a market driven approach is more widely accepted, the production, dissemination (scale) and financial sustainability of better technical content, we should be cautious about what success we report.
Forum Forum: "Using ICT to enable Agricultural Innovation Systems for smallholders" September, 2012
Question 4 (opens 26 Sept.)
I'm not sure it's accurate to use retention rate as a reflection of impact especially if fees are subsidized as part of a non-profit model.
I'm not sure it's accurate to use retention rate as a reflection of impact especially if fees are subsidized as part of a non-profit model.
Laura ... Hallelujah! We train and supply farmers. Potentially they should be able to double to triple their yields but free will is a funny thing. A farmer has to implement what they have learned. And yes, where they choose to sell their final crop is also their decision. The same dynamics exist for mobile content. I know it may be irritating to hear but farming is done in the dirt so the simple transfer of knowledge to a farmer isn't enough to increase yields or income. If nothing else, we need to start teaching farmers gross margin models so that before they even prepare their fields they can manage not just production but the costs of production.