Myla Borres
| Organization type | Government/Bilateral Organization |
|---|---|
| Country | Philippines |
This member participated in the following Forums
Forum Forum: "ICT and producer organizations" November, 2012
Question 4 (opens 20 Nov.)
I agree with Sir Pierre that ICT marginalizes women and small holders in producer organizations. According to NAM S&T Centre’s publication “market economy trends in the new era of globalization widened the gap between education and technology opportunities for men and women.” However, women are rich human capital which when given the right intervention can help boosts economic activities using ICT. http://www.namstct.org/Publication_Pdf/Info_Brochure_Empowerment_Women_10.pdf
Below is a success story of women using CELAC (Collecting & Exchange of Local Agricultural Content) in Uganda lifted from http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict_stories/themes/e-rural.html
Success Strategy: It is a common trend today within government and the farming community that in
order to realize increasing and better farm outputs, one needs to adopt use of modern farming methods. True as it may sound, its practicality among the grassroot farming communities is doubtable.
This is because its adoption comes along with the need to use modern farm inputs like hybrid seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides and machinery which these farmers cannot afford. In Uganda, more than 70% of the farming community is composed of the women folk. It is they that shoulder the burden of fending for their often polygamous and extended families while the men collect, apportion and spend the incomes derived. It is on this foundation that the CELAC Project was laid. The project targets improving particularly the rural women farmers’ livelihoods and food security through engaging the government and civil society (women farmers inclusive) into a culture of knowledge sharing and information management of local content using ICT methods that include weekly SMS; the annual Knowledge Fair; radio and informational brochures and newsletters; through radio cassette and DVDs and the project website.
Partners: BROSDI, Hivos, FICOM (Farmers information Communication Management), ICTARD (Information Communication and Technologies for Africa Rural Development), Linux Solutions, VEDCO (Volunteer Efforts for Development Concerns), World Vision, NAADS (National Agricultural Advisory Services)
Hi Bry,
The Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) sees to it that the local government units (LGUs) complied with the organization of the LCPC and monitors its' functionality. The LCPC fund - 1% of the LGU's Internal Revenue Allotment - is mandated that is courtesy of RA 9344 or the Juvenile Justice Welfare Act of 2006, for the purpose of providing programs/projects/activities that will serve as interventions for child at risk to be a child in conflict with the law (CICL) and for the diversion and rehabilitation programs of the CICL. Some LGUs utilized it for programs and projects which addresses child's survival, protection, development and participation. I am happy though that there are LGUs who used their funds responsibly.
For women empowerment, LGUs are mandated to allot 5% of their total budget for gender and development and related programs, projects and activities. This amount is much bigger than the 1% LCPC fund which the government (when the PPAs are well planned by the LGU and other sectors conecerned, especially marginalized women) can address gender and development gaps.
Question 3 (opens 19 Nov.)
Factors such as social, economic and regulatory environment can influence the success of ICT project implementation.
Public sector can support producers’ organizations and their uptake of ICT by formulating policies which will make way for telecommunications infrastructure and access; strengthen and enable implementation of ICT projects by developing the skills of the extension agents on their role as link between the farmers and research products/technologies ; informed discussion with producers’ organizations on the potential application of ICT; education and digital literacy of producers’ organizations; grant incentives for ICT education and training at all level; provide support/investment on ICT research for ICT development to attract investors and encourage private sectors to innovate; find means for sharing best practices and lessons learned of other organizations; strengthen online security and privacy; encourage private sectors to invest on ICT by giving them affordable financing incentives (tax credits, loans at affordable interest and accelerated appreciation schedules for ICT assets); encourage competition among ICT firms/suppliers – competitive bidding - when procuring ICT products/services and promote public-private partnership for ICT program/projects/undertakings (including research).
ICT as Enablers of Development: A Microsoft Whitepaper 2004
www.itu.int/wsis/stocktaking/docs/activities/1109618441
I agree with Peter and Koy that the Civil Society Organization (NGOs/POs), Private Sector as well as the media should be tapped in the provision, information and education of farmers on ICT. With the limited government resources (sometimes no sound planning and budgeting at that) extension workers can not be adequately provided. Most of agricultural municipalities (4th to 6th class) covering more than 30 barangays/villages have only 4 or less agricultural extension workers. Budget for traveling expenses are not also well provided as well as capacity development of agricultural technologists.
Private Sectors or the business sectors can also play a vital role in the provision of ICT facilities which the government could not afford. Media can air out agricultural technology updates to farmers.
Information to farmers can be dessiminated through sms at lower cost which I am sure is within the budget range of the government.
Question 1 (opens 12 Nov.)
Hello Sr. Eva,
It is not only the farmers in Mindanao who are experiencing that situation. That is why the National government particularly the National Anti-Poverty Commission (NAPC) in coordination with the Human Development and Poverty Reduction Cluster and the Good Governance and Anti-Corruption Cluster organized under Executive Order No. 43 s. 2011, together with the Department of Budget and Management (DBM) and Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) piloted the bottom-up approach to planning which ensured that funding requirement for the development needs of at least 300 of the 609 selected focus local government units were included for the Budget Year 2013. I was able to participate in one of the bottom-up planning and budgeting (BUPB) , it was a multisectoral plan -local poverty reduction action plan (LPRAP)- it will not be entertained by NAPC without the endorsement of the CSO representatives. With regards to agriculture farm-to-market roads; post-harvest facilities, farm aninamals (dispersal) and livelihood projects for fisherfolks were identified. Early next year, more LGUs will conduct the BUPB so that their programs, projects and activities identified in their LPRAP can be included in the 2014 General Appropritions Act.
The Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) here in the Philippines has this flagship program known as the Local Governance Performance Management System (LGPMS). It is a self-assessment tool and web-based development management tool for provinces, cities and municipalities capable of providing information on the capacities and limitations of Local Government Units (LGUs) in the delivery of essential services (Compendium of DILG Key Programs and Projects). It aims to provide results-oriented information concerning levels of LGU management capacity, service delivery and state of development. It emphasizes on the areas of Valuing Fundamentals of Good Governance, Administration Governance, Social Services Governance, Economic Development Governance – which includes support to Agriculture and support to Fishery sectors - and Environmental Management Governance. It also reflects financial reports of the LGU and the state of local development (generated every three years after the term of the local officials). The results of the LGPMS are the State of Local Governance Report (SLGR), e-Financial Report and State of Local Development Report (SLDR). After generating these reports, an Exit Conference or Utilization Conference is conducted to address the gaps by incorporating it in the Local Development Plans as well as the Capacity Development Agenda. CSOs and Private Sectors' representatives are also invited for their inputs. LGUs’ performances are open to the public.
Another program of the Department initiated by the late SILG Robredo is the Full Disclosure Policy (FDP), where LGUs are required to post Local Budget and Finances, and Bids and Public Offerings in the FDP Portal. Compliance to FDP is one of the requirements of the LGU in receiving the Seal of Good Housekeeping (SGH) award which enable LGUs –especially 4th -6th class – to avail the Performance Challenge Fund (PCF), which can be used to augment in financing development projects included in the Annual Investment Program (AIP). SGH is also a requirement for an LGU to avail of bank loans and other financial institutions per Local Finance Circular 1-2012.
I agree with you that curriculum in agriculture needed to be revisited and I also believe that Agricultural Universities/schools' management are tailoring the course to the current situation and future demands. I remember when I was taking BS Agriculture in the early 90’s Computer Science was an elective subject, but I did not take it. After I graduated, most of the jobs I had (even now)have something to do with computers – research work in plant breeding , in the local government unit, in hotels and especially now with my stint in the DILG – actually I regretted that I did not grab the chance to enroll in computer subject then :-(. But you see Agricultural Universities have foreseen the importance of computer subject in the field of agriculture. We would not be surprised if ICT will be offered in the curriculum soon :-).
Question 2 (opens 14 Nov.)
I completely agree with you that innovation sharing or replication of best practices using ICt is one of the best avenues to promote ICTs to farmers.
Most farmers in rural areas have access to DVD players where it will be convenient to play best practices of other farmers to a group of people. Besides, videos are more interesting to farmers, especially if it will be translated in their native language.
Hi Sir Pierre
I agree with you and Sansu that mobile phone and radio are the easiest and most convenient ICT to connect rural people with difficult access. They are not also expensive.
Here is a link that offers radio technolody without the use of a studio
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/askjack/2012/feb/09/ask-jack-recor…
There are also mobile phones with access to FM stations. FM stations can also air agricultural related news.
ICT adoption is influenced by factors like: location, size and income level of the operation, access to market, insertion to the production chain, technological level and the age and education of the producers. Thus, to take advantage of ICT and to reverse asymmetrical development in agricultural production; measures such as developing mechanisms on the exchange of regional experiences (best practices) like facilitating access of farmers to ICT using telecentres, computer supply and connectivity programs for rural school, motivational and educational strategies aimed at overcoming resistance, demonstrating the usefulness of the technologies and developing digital skills are needed. For virtual capacity, implementing data flatforms and portals are recommended. With the assumption that connectivity will be supplied by the National Telecommunications Office, efforts should be focused on motivating farmers to adopt ICTs in management and production. It is very important that policies should be technically and financially feasible and sustainable and take into account the specific characteristics of the production systems, technological evolution and the range of interactions with the competitive, institutional and social environment should be in place. – Monica Rodrigues, Economic Affairs Officer, ECLAC http://www.eclac.cl/socinfo/noticias/paginas/3/44983/newsletter18ENG.pdf
The Department of Budget and Management in cooperation with the Department of the Interior and Local Government, Department of Agriculture, Department of Agrarian Reform, National Anti-Poverty Commission and the National Statistics Office spearheaded the Registry System for Basic Sectors in Agriculture (RSBSA) an important endeavor by the Good Governance and Anti-Corruption Cluster headed by His Excellency President Benigno S. Aquino III. This is in response to the need for a comprehensive and systematic information system that caters to the various data and information needs of economic development, planners, policymakers, and project implementors. RSBSA uses ICT, filled-up forms are scanned and stored in database.