In pursuit of establishing an international digital council for food and agriculture, we cross yet another degree where we face the useful reality to certain aspects we know of social media platforms. It is another pivotal moment of deciding how much power online council, online currency and online voting power we should allow. It is another moment where we may not be doing anything accept performing bureaucracy.
For myself, it has seemed curious how for years we can not facilitate an individual citizen; accurate vote on individual issues and tax dollars spent, when the means do so through social security numbers (and a few numbers) has existed more than a decade.
Total voting regulatory power could sit well within the now very popular block chain technologies, and this all bates mention of a Panama colleagues' Producers Market token, an agriculture v.s. digital technology solution. I happen to have an inside look at the team here and the king of this Hill, more or less selected to my knowledge and likely overall success, by my favorite teacher - and this type of selection in this case certainly, does not come to the undeserving. This model could be extremely proactive in promoting better agriculture that does not harm biology and wildlife.
If I am understanding the Producers Token platform right it would [c] essentially function as a marketing engine for the council itself, and for small transparent organic farmers within the ranks. [d] Food distribution costs can be saved and gained by the consumer and the producer who would be able to connect through the network. It is really quite perfect / even very much so for Nutritional Diversity Diet enthusiasts, who could through a network like this arrange there private food purchases for the required high food biodiversity.
I have enjoyed being one of the more abstract contributors to these important discussions. I also enjoy coming from a standpoint which I feel is correct. Not to get too ahead of things, ....
What about a really proactive council, to reforest using permaculture's food forest model, disaster stricken lands, etc. To educate cattle farmers how through permaculture models and not too much more on investment, can have there cows and and whole bunch of other goodies too.
If we can expand our hopes and aim to something of this nature, the smart phone app iNaturalist, seems to be a great functioning database reference for plant species and could play an integral role in bringing humanity back in touch with nature and back up knowledge Parr on functional foods. It is with kind of knowledge that we can live in harmony with nature instead of at odds with it and obtain individual freedom and sustainability.
Can this international council body dare to create insanely incredible ecology to our beautiful world?
As a technical "digital" body can we task ourselves to develop waist collection and conversion technologies -very easily online shared open source development potentials.
In many ways if we don't have the focus on the species, what are we doing.
If we are focusing on the species regional climate category groups would be able to harvest seed and use young species to supply ever expanding permaculture installations.
A joint efforts standard agreement could be a good fixture. For example should a poor farmer convert and work /grow on certain owned property for 50% take of produce. This could be great to see abandoned pasture or tragically destroyed lands be productively utilized easier. This type of job could be a great path for troubled youth.
Thanks and respecfully,
Mr. Brandon Eisler