Prof. Harriet Kuhnlein

Harriet V. Kuhnlein, BS, MS, PhD, LLD (hon), FASN, FIUNS
Harriet Kuhnlein is a nutritionist and Founding Director of the Centre for Indigenous Peoples’ Nutrition and Environment (CINE) and Emerita Professor of Human Nutrition in the Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Macdonald Campus of McGill University, Montreal, Canada. Dr. Kuhnlein received her Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley, and holds an honorary Doctor of Laws degree from The University of Western Ontario. She is a Fellow of the American Society of Nutrition, an Honorary Member of the Nutrition Society of Canada, and a Fellow the International Union of Nutritional Sciences (IUNS). Dr. Kuhnlein has been chair and co-chair of the IUNS Task Force on Indigenous and Traditional Food and Nutrition and was instrumental in the establishment of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization’s (FAO) Global-HUB on Indigenous Peoples’ Food and Knowledge Systems. Her participatory research with Indigenous Peoples’ food and nutrition began with the Hopi in 1974 and continued from her locations among the Coast Salish of Western North America and the Haudenosaune in Quebec. She has worked with more than 40 Indigenous cultures in the US, Canada and other parts of the world. Dr. Kuhnlein led research and publication of more than 400 articles, book chapters/proceedings and abstracts. In partnership with FAO, she has contributed to international case studies published and on-line at the FAO Indigenous Peoples’ repository of knowledge. With recognition as a Fulbright Specialist and several national and international awards Dr. Kuhnlein’s work continues with Indigenous Peoples to document food resources and surrounding knowledge and how this essential biocultural diversity must be protected and sustainable to enhance health and well-being.
Prof. Harriet Kuhnlein
This consultation is very welcome within the framework of Indigenous Peoples' rights and the need for sustainable continuation of the wealth of biocultural knowledge contained in Indigenous Peoples' food systems. I have enjoyed reading the entries to this point in time and offer some considerations, some more thorough than others, for each of the questions posed.
a) Yes, I agree with the guiding principles with these additional considerations:
Please also include the International Covenant of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, particularly Articles 13 and 15 that relate to cultural rights.
b) I agree that the focus should be Indigenous Peoples exclusively (not “local communities”). While all Indigenous communities are “local communities,” not all local communities meet the criteria of the UNPFII to identify as communities of Indigenous People. There is so much to be learned from communities of Indigenous Peoples, that that is no need to “dilute” the effort with including other communities. It is understood that findings that are relevant to Indigenous Peoples will in due course be considered in the global context for all people. In my opinion, do not add a comma in the title of the consultation.
2. Should the objectives include mainstreaming Indigenous Peoples’ food and knowledge systems, and lessons learned from them, for the benefit of all, or solely for the benefit of Indigenous Peoples as rights holders?
As stated above, lessons learned from Indigenous Peoples food and knowledge systems will automatically be read by the global community and applied when possible. Benefits for Indigenous Peoples as rights holders should be the primary focus for mainstreaming Indigenous Peoples’ food and knowledge systems. There is a vast diversity of Indigenous Peoples’ cultures and perspectives, and this diversity must be addressed with careful syntax. It is also notable that Indigenous Peoples’ diversity also includes the definitions of poverty and marginalization. Please consult the White/Whipala Paper on Indigenous Peoples’ Food Systems published by the FAO.
3. What are the challenges related to Free, Prior and Informed Consent and Access and Benefit Sharing when widely promoting and/or mainstreaming Indigenous Peoples food and knowledge systems?
The most difficult challenges relate to the use of knowledge in the broadest sense for capital benefit of those outside the referenced culture of Indigenous Peoples. This could include revealing locations of useful resources (plants, insects, etc.) or use of knowledge to process foods. The general principles of the “patent” of food and knowledge information should benefit the knowledge holders in ways agreed by them, in this case the Indigenous Peoples.
4. How can the report ensure the inclusion of marginalized groups, sustainability, and protection against commercialization risks for Indigenous Peoples' food and knowledge systems?
Indigenous Peoples from referenced cultures with food and knowledge information to be used need to agree how access to the resources will be given and how benefits will be shared from the commercialization.
5. How should oral knowledge and traditions be documented and referenced in the development of the report?
Oral knowledge and traditions can be cited by name and date when the knowledge is spoken or shared. This is in reference to published documents as well as transmitting such knowledge orally.
6. What dimensions linked to Indigenous Peoples’ agency, e.g., in governance issues, could be addressed?
Advice can be given how a community/culture of Indigenous Peoples can establish a traditional knowledge safety framework with reference to external access to this knowledge
7. Are there important/relevant policy papers and instruments missing from the foundational documents list?
As noted above, please include the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
8. Could you please indicate relevant references that should be taken into account?
There are several authors that include the notation of “Indigenous and Local” that may have relevant perspectives. See for example Fernandez-Llamazares, et al. 2021, Scientists’ Warning to Humanity on Threats to Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems. J. Ethnobiology 41(2):144-169.
9. What best practices, ethical standards, and strategies for addressing climate change should be highlighted in the report?
As with all topics related to Indigenous Peoples food and knowledge systems, climate change issues addressed by practices of Indigenous Peoples should be noted in full consultation with the original holders of the practices, and this should be acknowledged in the documentation.
10. Which best practices or strategies to promote cross-cultural understanding should be highlighted in the report?
Practices to ensure mutual respect, honesty, safety, reciprocity, equity, impartiality, and confidentiality when it is a sensitive topic. Practicing the CARE principles for Indigenous data governance: Collective benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, and Ethics.
11. Are the previous legal documents such as Prior and Informed Consent, enough in light of this evolution of thinking about Indigenous People’s knowledge, or do they need to be revised?
I believe that these documents are sound, and that they can be addressed or modified as needed in each circumstance related to ensuring that a particular practice will contribute to a sustainable food system.