Gender

©FAO
Gender and migration

In 2024, female migrants made up just under half (146 million, or 48 percent) of the global international migrant stock (UNDESA, 2024). 

In several countries across all agrifood system types, young women are more likely than young men to migrate internally, particularly for family reasons such as marriage (SYAF, 2025).  

In 2016, women sent approximately half of the estimated USD 601 billion in global remittances (UN Women, 2016). About 75 percent of remittances are used to meet basic household needs, such as food and housing, and to support access to education and health care, while the remaining 25 percent is saved or invested in income generating activities. Remittances are also used to help families and communities affected by weather shocks and crisis. 

It is estimated that around 50 percent of all remittances reach rural areas (IFAD, 2024).

Migration should be a choice for men and women, not a necessity. It is thus critical to address the adverse drivers of migration, including conflicts, crises, poverty, food insecurity, inequality, unemployment, lack of social protection, environmental degradation and climate change. Migration can create opportunities to build sustainable livelihoods, but also challenges for rural and farming communities, migrants and their families. Safe and regular migration pathways are needed to fill labour gaps while protecting migrants’ rights. Support provided in rural areas to family members remaining behind, facilitating migrant investment back home, and assisting the reintegration of migrants can help minimize the negative effects of migration and maximize its benefits.  

Migration has important gender dimensions. Men and women experience migration differently depending on the context, and women and girls face additional vulnerabilities. Migrant women encounter many challenges accessing decent jobs and face “double discrimination” as women and migrants, including lower pay than men for comparable work. Time scarcity of migrant women, who are often responsible for productive work and household food provision, may have negative nutrition outcomes in new food environments. The youth, women and internal migrants are also the most likely to be out of education, employment or training (SYAF 2025). Women and girls face heightened risk of gender-based violence and trafficking and they are more likely affected by conflict or disasters in the context of migration, including at origin, in transit and at destination.  When disasters strike, women often cannot evacuate due to gender-related factors reducing their mobility, being trapped by their care responsibilities, or real and perceived lack of safety at shelters where their needs are not catered for.   

For women who remain behind, male outmigration from rural communities may imply a redistribution of household labour, placing a heavier burden on women who must balance reproductive roles with additional farm responsibilities and paid work (i.e. as waged laborers). When they do not receive remittances, women face greater risk of poverty and food insecurity. Girls and boys may be pulled out of school to replace their mothers or fathers, negatively impacting their future. 

Migration has mixed impacts on women’s financial independence and agency. Migrant women may gain financial independence and greater say in household decisions with meaningful shifts in gender stereotypes. Women also tend to send a higher proportion of their income as remittances, despite earning less than men. Migrated women may empower other women at destination by freeing their care responsibilities, enabling them to participate or be more involved in the labour force, and in areas of origin by investing in businesses employing women or sharing knowledge from destination cultures. However, many women resume their traditional roles and face stigma and marginalization if they return. Similarly, due to male outmigration, rural women who stay behind may or may not gain increased agency and decision-making power over the use of remittances, depending on the context. In some cases, young wives may be absorbed into their in-laws’ household and often lose their autonomy. Even in nuclear households, men often continue to decide about investments, farming and resource management in absentia (Fakir and Abedin 2020). Women who remain behind may be excluded from community decisions about, and have limited access to, financial services, agricultural extension services and training. These constraints affect their ability to manage productive resources and climate adaptation, limiting the potential contribution of migration to women’s empowerment and sustainable agrifood systems development.  

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) supports governments and strategic partners to address the rural dimensions of migration and its implications for rural people and agrifood systems, and strengthens the positive contribution of migrants to rural development through safe, orderly and regular migration. 

  • Migrant women can significantly contribute to the wellbeing and resilience of their rural households. Yet they face several challenges in their migration destinations, including discrimination and low pay.  
     
  • Male outmigration leads to re-distribution of household labour, increasing women’s roles in farm and off-farm waged work, alongside their reproductive roles. Women face more constraints in accessing critical resources and services to carry out their work. The relationship between male outmigration and women’s empowerment is mixed, and not all women gain agency. 
     
  • Gender-responsive programmes, policies and legal frameworks are key for protecting the rights and wellbeing of women who migrate and those who remain behind. 
     
  • Gender greatly influences all phases of migration. Understanding the gender dimensions of migration is crucial to enhance the benefits and mitigate the costs for rural women and girls. 
     
  • Approaches to rural migration, focusing mostly on the economic and financial cost-benefits, should also integrate social and cultural aspects to unveil and address gender inequalities and support women’s empowerment. 

  • Develop an evidence-based understanding of gender-differentiated migration dynamics and impacts, considering the heterogeneity of gender-related outcomes. 
     
  • Provide equal access for migrant and rural women who remain behind to education and training, to facilitate their opportunities for decent work and pay, both in rural areas of origin and destination, and support their financial inclusion. 
     
  • Develop and implement gender-responsive agricultural support services, including extension and technical assistance to support women who stay behind. 
     
  • Address the “double discrimination” of women in the labour markets in destinations. 
     
  • Support the social and economic reintegration of migrant women into rural societies, including by addressing stigma, facilitating access to employment or assisting to create enterprises. 

Under the programme Enhancing the resilience to climate change of migrant and vulnerable households in the coastal areas of Odisha State and drought-prone areas of Telangana State, FAO and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in India support rural women who remain behind when men migrate by providing training to women, agricultural extension staff and grassroots organizations to enhance women’s decision-making power and engagement in local planning. 

Through gender-responsive programmes, FAO aims to improve access to technologies and assets for women in migrant-sending rural households to foster decent work and climate-resilient, sustainable and inclusive food systems. FAO also supports policy and decision-makers and advocates for gender-responsive migration policies that facilitate women’s safe, regular and orderly migration, as well as gender- and shock-responsive social protection policies and programmes that support rural women when men migrate and women migrants at destination, strengthening their resilience. 

In Kenya, agribusiness has been used as a sustainable tool to mitigate rural-urban migration of youth by providing training that changes perceptions towards farming and the mind set of young people about the potential of agriculture and agrifood systems to create job opportunities. The project also introduced new technologies and mechanization and supported livestock development.   

 
Key Resources
Publications
The Status of Youth in Agrifood Systems
01/07/2025

FAO's "The Status of Youth in Agrifood Systems" report is a call to action. It presents the most comprehensive, evidence-based analysis of youth in...

Resources
Loading...