Agroecology Knowledge Hub

Publications

Agroecology has existed as a scientific discipline since the 1930s, beginning largely with field and plot scales and focusing on the biological interactions between elements of the ecosystem and agriculture. Through this lens, viewing farms as ecosystems that are driven by ecological forces, novel management approaches have been developed that would not otherwise be considered.  Biological forms of managing pests through restoring natural balances, are one key example. 

As the field of ecology grew, so agroecology has expanded its scope, in bringing ecological principles to bear in the design and management of agroecosystems, beyond fields to include landscapes and communities. Increasingly, it has encompassed the social organization of communities, recognised as one of the pillars of agroecology.  The spread and uptake of agroecology, over the last decades, has rested largely in the hands of farmer-to-farmer dissemination, with researchers supporting such farmer innovation. 

As a scientific discipline, agroecology is not prescriptive; it provides no recipes or technical packages. It is based on the local application of basic agroecological principles. FAO’s framework on agroecology is based on the following elements: diversity, co-creation and sharing of knowledge, synergies, efficiency, recycling, resilience, human and social values, culture and food traditions, responsible governance, circular and solidarity economy. The choice of management practices and technologies to achieve agroecology or to move towards an agroecological transition is always location specific, shaped by a given social-ecological context.

The science of agroecology explicitly recognises the value of bottom-up participatory research and knowledge and promotes: (i) bridging formal and informal innovation processes; (ii) combining local knowledge systems and expertise with scientific knowledge; (iii) acknowledging and respecting farmers and food provisioners as owners of knowledge and co-researchers and innovators.

Database
CGIAR argues that scaling must be built into research from the start, linking proven innovations with finance, institutions and delivery systems for lasting uptake
2026
More than 80 science-based guidelines show how vegetated buffers, corridors and greenways can support soil, water, biodiversity and agricultural production
2026
A comparative study of Peru and Kenya shows how crises, advocacy, institutions and policy framings have shaped the emergence of national agroecology policy landscape
2026
IPES-Food examines how digital agriculture, AI and agricultural data can reshape power in food systems, and explores governance options centred on data sovereignty
2026
Research in central Uganda assesses how traditional leafy vegetable value chains align with agroecological principles across production and local markets
2026
On-farm research in East Java tests maize, legumes and chickens in complex agroecosystems to improve yields while supporting local varieties and knowledge
2026
Research from Spain’s Sierra de Aracena explores how agroecological value-chain changes could help reduce abandonment of traditional chestnut farming
2026
Community Seed Bank Options is the compilation of many individual research experiments, papers, ideas, technologies, and experiences offered over several years by individuals working to further best practices in community seed banking, seed saving, and genetic preservation.
2026
In the Tropical Andean mountains of Colombia’s Southwestern Antioquia, history has taken an unexpected turn. Land once shaped by conflict and narcotrafficking is now becoming a beacon of regeneration with transformative potential far beyond its boundaries. Working from a painful past towards a vision of “our best possible future”, what imaginaries of change can this territory offer?
2026
La réflexion engagée par la DyTAES offrent une opportunité majeure pour consolider les acquis, lever les contraintes et promouvoir un cadre institutionnel robuste, à la hauteur des ambitions nationales en matière de transition agroécologique.
2026
This document will take you on a journey. It highlights the needs for, benefits of, and institutional barriers to, agroecological vegetable and fruit production for building sustainable, resilient, fair and healthy food systems, that meet or exceed the Net Zero carbon emission targets of the UK
2026
This meta-analysis evaluates the multi-dimensional impacts of agroecological transitions on farm economic performance across the Global South, covering Sub-Saharan Africa, South/Southeast Asia, Latin America and Australia.
2026
The study provides evidence that biological control and biofertiliser supplementation can be effectively used to manage agricultural pests. It also demonstrates the value of close collaboration with farmers and agronomy advisors in conducting ecological field research with real-world applications.
2026
We conduct a scoping review to identify and evaluate the potential of 42 existing agroecology adherence and/or agricultural performance assessment tools to generate credible, legitimate, salient and transferable evidence to inform these transitions. Results show that while multiple relevant tools exist, each of them can be strengthened in at least one area.
2026
We present a systematic evidence map of 354 regression models from 193 peer-reviewed studies (1982–2023) examining how multiple factors relate to five decision-making stages (awareness, interest, adoption, intensity of adoption and dis-adoption) across 10 diversified farming practices in 45 countries.
2026
A scalar contradiction exists between agroecology's three goals: while ecological sustainability is best pursued at the landscape scale, social equity and livelihood goals often require organizing production at the small scale of family farms. In China's ‘industrial agriculture of small farmers’, ecological farming practices became economically unviable at small farmers' minuscule scales.
2026
A widely accepted narrative suggests that smallholders are more rooted in agroecological systems, while larger, better-endowed farms follow “conventional” models. This paper challenges that dualistic view by providing evidence of a wider set of relationship between farm structure and the diversity of agroecological practices across multiple African contexts.
2026
This exploratory study in Dakar, Senegal, asks: how could agroecological markets support healthier diets in urban and periurban areas for low-income consumers?
2026
This study evaluates the multicriteria performance of maize–bean row intercropping compared with sole cropping and mixed intercropping under contrasting farm conditions. We conducted a large-scale, multiseason on-farm study with 382 trials across a wide range of environments in Rwanda.
2026
This Perspective synthesizes evidence from agriculture, sustainability science, public health, and policy research to examine why scaling efforts often stall. The analysis suggests that barriers arise more from the incentives, institutions, and narratives shaping contemporary food systems, which continue to favor input intensive production and narrow performance metrics.
2026