Agroecology Knowledge Hub

Publications

Agroecology has existed as a scientific discipline since the 1930s, beginning largely with field and plot scales and focusing on the biological interactions between elements of the ecosystem and agriculture. Through this lens, viewing farms as ecosystems that are driven by ecological forces, novel management approaches have been developed that would not otherwise be considered.  Biological forms of managing pests through restoring natural balances, are one key example. 

As the field of ecology grew, so agroecology has expanded its scope, in bringing ecological principles to bear in the design and management of agroecosystems, beyond fields to include landscapes and communities. Increasingly, it has encompassed the social organization of communities, recognised as one of the pillars of agroecology.  The spread and uptake of agroecology, over the last decades, has rested largely in the hands of farmer-to-farmer dissemination, with researchers supporting such farmer innovation. 

As a scientific discipline, agroecology is not prescriptive; it provides no recipes or technical packages. It is based on the local application of basic agroecological principles. FAO’s framework on agroecology is based on the following elements: diversity, co-creation and sharing of knowledge, synergies, efficiency, recycling, resilience, human and social values, culture and food traditions, responsible governance, circular and solidarity economy. The choice of management practices and technologies to achieve agroecology or to move towards an agroecological transition is always location specific, shaped by a given social-ecological context.

The science of agroecology explicitly recognises the value of bottom-up participatory research and knowledge and promotes: (i) bridging formal and informal innovation processes; (ii) combining local knowledge systems and expertise with scientific knowledge; (iii) acknowledging and respecting farmers and food provisioners as owners of knowledge and co-researchers and innovators.

Database
US ranchers' perspectives reveal four dimensions of regeneration as a shared value for ecosystem recovery, well-being and sustainable rangeland futures.
2026
A civil society review of GAFSP projects in seven countries examines lessons on agroecology, farmer organizations, climate resilience, gender and nutrition.
2026
A review of 66 sources examines agroforestry’s socio-economic benefits in Africa, adoption barriers and policy options for resilient livelihoods and food security.
2026
This scientific paper examines the structural barriers that keep industrial agriculture and food systems locked into unsustainable production and consumption patterns, despite their environmental, health and social costs.
2026
A comparison of EU policy and practitioner indicators identifies gaps in agroecology monitoring and proposes 16 new indicators and six revisions.
2026
This article compares regional experiences in Sweden and Italy to examine how agri-environmental policies interact with agroecological transitions and alternative visions for agriculture.
2026
Participatory research with 43 Ecuadorian cocoa farmers reveals gaps in sustainability indicators, highlighting social, cultural and regional priorities.
2026
An assessment of five AI advisory systems identifies potential biases in crop protection recommendations and calls for stronger safeguards to support agroecological farming.
2026
A Kenyan mango farmer reduces pest losses through integrated pest management, demonstrating alternatives to chemical pesticides and barriers to wider adoption.
2026
Dutch monitoring finds more pollinators and pest predators in glasshouse biodiversity strips, while further research examines crop protection risks.
2026
Digital agriculture promises greater efficiency through artificial intelligence, precision farming, automated machinery and data-driven decision-making. Yet behind these technologies lie questions about who controls agricultural data, who benefits from digital innovation and what environmental and social costs it entails.
2026
An OECD guide provides indicators and tools to integrate climate adaptation, mitigation and environmental measurement into agri-food development projects.
2026
A study of 210 North American farms links regenerative management with higher soil carbon and biodiversity while finding broadly comparable farm profits.
2026
The Yaoundé Declaration sets regional targets for agroecology financing, land and seed rights, participation and accountability across the Congo Basin.
2026
A Ukrainian monograph examines agroecology’s socio-economic potential, transition assessment tools and policy needs in the context of European integration.
2026
An Asia-wide learning exchange examines financing, cooperatives, territorial markets and grassroots institutions that can sustain agroecology economies.
2026
Zambia’s experience highlights tensions between commercial input-led agricultural policies, limited maize yield gains and smallholder concerns over costs and dependency.
2026
Farmers’ experiences in Kenya highlight concerns over input dependency, soil degradation, farm debt and persistent food insecurity under commercial agriculture.
2026
Senegal’s agricultural experience links staple-yield gains with crop diversification, farmer participation, local seeds and comparatively lower fertilizer use.
2026
Malawi’s rising maize and staple production contrasts with persistent undernutrition, soil degradation and challenges in agricultural input support.
2026