Agroecology Knowledge Hub

Publications

Agroecology has existed as a scientific discipline since the 1930s, beginning largely with field and plot scales and focusing on the biological interactions between elements of the ecosystem and agriculture. Through this lens, viewing farms as ecosystems that are driven by ecological forces, novel management approaches have been developed that would not otherwise be considered.  Biological forms of managing pests through restoring natural balances, are one key example. 

As the field of ecology grew, so agroecology has expanded its scope, in bringing ecological principles to bear in the design and management of agroecosystems, beyond fields to include landscapes and communities. Increasingly, it has encompassed the social organization of communities, recognised as one of the pillars of agroecology.  The spread and uptake of agroecology, over the last decades, has rested largely in the hands of farmer-to-farmer dissemination, with researchers supporting such farmer innovation. 

As a scientific discipline, agroecology is not prescriptive; it provides no recipes or technical packages. It is based on the local application of basic agroecological principles. FAO’s framework on agroecology is based on the following elements: diversity, co-creation and sharing of knowledge, synergies, efficiency, recycling, resilience, human and social values, culture and food traditions, responsible governance, circular and solidarity economy. The choice of management practices and technologies to achieve agroecology or to move towards an agroecological transition is always location specific, shaped by a given social-ecological context.

The science of agroecology explicitly recognises the value of bottom-up participatory research and knowledge and promotes: (i) bridging formal and informal innovation processes; (ii) combining local knowledge systems and expertise with scientific knowledge; (iii) acknowledging and respecting farmers and food provisioners as owners of knowledge and co-researchers and innovators.

We conduct a scoping review to identify and evaluate the potential of 42 existing agroecology adherence and/or agricultural performance assessment tools to generate credible, legitimate, salient and transferable evidence to inform these transitions. Results show that while multiple relevant tools exist, each of them can be strengthened in at least one area.
2026
In the Tropical Andean mountains of Colombia’s Southwestern Antioquia, history has taken an unexpected turn. Land once shaped by conflict and narcotrafficking is now becoming a beacon of regeneration with transformative potential far beyond its boundaries. Working from a painful past towards a vision of “our best possible future”, what imaginaries of change can this territory offer?
2026
The study provides evidence that biological control and biofertiliser supplementation can be effectively used to manage agricultural pests. It also demonstrates the value of close collaboration with farmers and agronomy advisors in conducting ecological field research with real-world applications.
2026
This meta-analysis evaluates the multi-dimensional impacts of agroecological transitions on farm economic performance across the Global South, covering Sub-Saharan Africa, South/Southeast Asia, Latin America and Australia.
2026
Community Seed Bank Options is the compilation of many individual research experiments, papers, ideas, technologies, and experiences offered over several years by individuals working to further best practices in community seed banking, seed saving, and genetic preservation.
2026
A scalar contradiction exists between agroecology's three goals: while ecological sustainability is best pursued at the landscape scale, social equity and livelihood goals often require organizing production at the small scale of family farms. In China's ‘industrial agriculture of small farmers’, ecological farming practices became economically unviable at small farmers' minuscule scales.
2026
This exploratory study in Dakar, Senegal, asks: how could agroecological markets support healthier diets in urban and periurban areas for low-income consumers?
2026
A widely accepted narrative suggests that smallholders are more rooted in agroecological systems, while larger, better-endowed farms follow “conventional” models. This paper challenges that dualistic view by providing evidence of a wider set of relationship between farm structure and the diversity of agroecological practices across multiple African contexts.
2026
This Perspective synthesizes evidence from agriculture, sustainability science, public health, and policy research to examine why scaling efforts often stall. The analysis suggests that barriers arise more from the incentives, institutions, and narratives shaping contemporary food systems, which continue to favor input intensive production and narrow performance metrics.
2026
We present a systematic evidence map of 354 regression models from 193 peer-reviewed studies (1982–2023) examining how multiple factors relate to five decision-making stages (awareness, interest, adoption, intensity of adoption and dis-adoption) across 10 diversified farming practices in 45 countries.
2026
This study evaluates the multicriteria performance of maize–bean row intercropping compared with sole cropping and mixed intercropping under contrasting farm conditions. We conducted a large-scale, multiseason on-farm study with 382 trials across a wide range of environments in Rwanda.
2026
This article argues that indigenous Buen Vivir approaches from the Andes and Amazon regions may contribute to current agroecology and convivial conservation practices by adding a distinct biocentric worldview.
2026
A growing number of countries across the world are adopting public policies on agroecology or to scale agroecological practices. In this light there is an urgent need to develop appropriate methodologies to collect evidence on how the implementation of national strategies or policies shape food system transformation and how they affect the achievement of societal goals and national priorities.
2026
La réflexion engagée par la DyTAES offrent une opportunité majeure pour consolider les acquis, lever les contraintes et promouvoir un cadre institutionnel robuste, à la hauteur des ambitions nationales en matière de transition agroécologique.
2026
This document will take you on a journey. It highlights the needs for, benefits of, and institutional barriers to, agroecological vegetable and fruit production for building sustainable, resilient, fair and healthy food systems, that meet or exceed the Net Zero carbon emission targets of the UK
2026
For philanthropic organisations, agroecology presents a secure, catalytic investment opportunity. Collaboration across multiple funders spreads risk and builds collective learning, while the resources invested into African-led innovations and networks can alter the underlying systems shaping food, the climate and livelihoods.
2026
Soil health is central to agroecological transitions, yet guidance for integrating it into agri-food system design and monitoring remains fragmented. Here we review how soil health is operationalized within agroecology and agri-food systems and translate these patterns into an actionable programming guide.
2026
Farmers across Nepal use synthetic pesticides to protect their crops from pest attack. However, these agrochemicals have found their way to our food plates. Swastika Shrestha of Welthungerhilfe (WHH) partner organization ANSAB examines the growing presence of pesticide residues in Nepal’s food system and the associated health and economic implications.
2026
Agroecology is increasingly proposed in literature as a possible solution to mitigate the impact of anthropic agricultural activity on the environment, even though in Europe its potential is still not entirely clear. Many principles of agroecology have been put forward to bridge the gap between theory and real farming practices; however, its practical applicability remains complex.
2026
Hanoi-based researchers of the Food Environment and Consumer Behavior (FECB) team provided technical support at the International Support Group (ISG) Plenary Meeting 2025, marking a reaffirmed commitment to supporting Vietnam's continued initiatives toward an inclusive, equitable, and sustainable food systems.
2026