Foro Global sobre Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición (Foro FSN)

Consultas

Fortalecimiento de los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos para alcanzar la seguridad alimentaria y afianzar la nutrición en el contexto de la urbanización y la transformación rural

El Grupo de alto nivel de expertos en seguridad alimentaria y nutrición  (GANESAN) está elaborando el informe “Fortalecimiento de los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos para alcanzar la seguridad alimentaria y afianzar la nutrición en el contexto de la urbanización y la transformación rural”, a petición del Comité de Seguridad Alimentaria Mundial (CSA). El informe del GANESAN se presentará en el 52.º período de sesiones del CSA en octubre de 2024.

Con esta consulta electrónica, el GANESAN desea conocer su opinión sobre el alcance propuesto para este informe y las preguntas orientativas que figuran a continuación.

ALCANCE Y JUSTIFICACIÓN

Casi el 60 % de la población mundial vive actualmente en núcleos urbanos (ONU DAES, 2018; Acharya et al., 2020). En general, se consideran motores de crecimiento y empleo, donde se produce más del 80 % del producto interno bruto (PIB) mundial. Pero también se enfrentan a enormes desafíos para garantizar el acceso de todos sus residentes a servicios esenciales, como sanidad, educación, transporte y alimentación. La población urbana está aumentando rápidamente, con un incremento particularmente acusado en África y Asia. Por ejemplo, las 15 ciudades del mundo cuya población crece de forma más rápida se encuentran en África. Además de la urbanización, se ha producido una “disociación geográfica” (Langemeyer et al., 2021) entre las ciudades y el suministro de alimentos, debido a la reorientación del uso de la tierra urbana y periurbana en búsqueda de “mayores beneficios”. En este sentido, las ciudades y municipios están perdiendo con rapidez tierras agrícolas periurbanas, que históricamente les han proporcionado alimentos frescos y saludables. Las zonas urbanas también están sufriendo un mayor número de fenómenos meteorológicos extremos que afectan a los medios de vida e ingresos de su población, mientras aumentan las desigualdades entre sus habitantes (Pelling et al., 2021). Estas tendencias implican que las zonas urbanas y periurbanas también concentran riesgos para la inseguridad alimentaria y la malnutrición, tal y como se puso de manifiesto durante la pandemia de la enfermedad por coronavirus (COVID-19) (véase, por ejemplo, Rede PENSSAN, 2021), agravada por desastres naturales y conflictos. Al mismo tiempo, las zonas urbanas y periurbanas tienen múltiples recursos y sirven como centros para la educación, la tecnología y la innovación, los servicios sanitarios y sociales y la producción, elaboración y distribución de alimentos. Todas estas funciones se podrían potenciar.

A menudo, las relaciones económicas y comerciales informales en los sistemas alimentarios en zonas urbanas empobrecidas pueden ser fundamentales para la seguridad alimentaria, pero son ignoradas por políticas y regulaciones. Los sistemas alimentarios informales están formados por una red compleja de proveedores, transportistas, vendedores ambulantes, minoristas y vendedores de alimentos en la vía pública y en los mercados, además de los agricultores, y contribuyen a que los alimentos sean más accesibles y asequibles para los consumidores urbanos. Sin embargo, estos actores del sector informal dependen principalmente de sus propios recursos y capital, y cuentan con muy poco respaldo político para reforzar sus empresas y garantizar la calidad, como apoyo para el acceso a información sobre los mercados, transporte y logística, cadenas de frío o instalaciones de reutilización de residuos (Tefft et al., 2017). De hecho, en ausencia de una planificación específica de los sistemas alimentarios, la venta y el consumo de alimentos altamente procesados está creciendo en la mayoría de los centros urbanos, mientras que el comercio local ­—que ofrece alimentos saludables y frescos a precios asequibles, y a menudo en cantidades más pequeñas— queda relegado, contribuyendo a los denominados “desiertos alimentarios”. Estas tendencias suelen afectar a la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición de forma negativa (Peyton, Moseley y Battersby, 2015; Battersby, 2017; Acharya et al., 2020).

Esta falta de coherencia en materia de políticas pone de relieve una falta general de coordinación entre las políticas y los actores relacionados con la seguridad alimentaria, la agricultura o el medio ambiente y la planificación urbana. Y se ve agravada por la escasez general de datos, análisis y evidencias empíricas a nivel urbano para fundamentar la toma de decisiones sobre políticas alimentarias urbanas y periurbanas. Es por ello que los responsables de formular las políticas tienen dificultades para planificar, priorizar, diseñar y realizar un seguimiento de las intervenciones en los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos, así como para garantizar la coherencia entre políticas y sectores. Además, los gobiernos y otros órganos —como los sistemas de alerta temprana para casos de hambruna (FEWS, por sus siglas en inglés)— no han logrado que el seguimiento de la inseguridad alimentaria en zonas urbanas esté al mismo nivel que el de zonas rurales, limitándose a indicadores muy básicos como precios de los alimentos (Moseley, 2001; Krishnamurthy, Choularton y Kareiva, 2020).

Las ciudades pueden desempeñar un papel vital en la formulación de políticas de los sistemas alimentarios para reforzar su resiliencia de varias maneras. Pueden producir alimentos cultivados localmente o de forma regenerativa cuando proceda, facilitar la producción urbana y periurbana sostenible de alimentos nutritivos, evitar el desperdicio de alimentos aumentando la inversión en bioeconomía circular (definida en términos generales como una economía basada en el uso sostenible, la reutilización y la regeneración de los recursos naturales) y construir mercados inclusivos invirtiendo en infraestructuras para que pequeños comerciantes y minoristas puedan comercializar productos alimenticios más saludables. También pueden promover la resiliencia mitigando los efectos negativos del cambio climático y adaptándose a ellos (GANESAN, 2020; Heck y Alonso, 2021).

La agricultura urbana y periurbana es una opción importante, con efectos potencialmente positivos en la diversidad dietética, la calidad de los espacios urbanos, las acciones comunitarias, y el empoderamiento. Pero, en la mayoría de las ciudades —especialmente en el Sur del mundo— el apoyo estatal a la agricultura urbana y periurbana es limitado. Por el contrario, la regulación actual de las ciudades y el creciente valor de mercado de la tierra periurbana limitan las oportunidades para la producción local. Un estudio reciente de la FAO concluyó que los gobiernos municipales desempeñan un papel sumamente importante en la identificación y conexión de los actores de los sistemas alimentarios a fin de fomentar iniciativas innovadoras comunitarias que contribuyan a mejorar la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición (FAO, 2020). Por ejemplo, ante las dramáticas consecuencias de la pandemia, los huertos domésticos proporcionaron complementos alimenticios nutritivos y saludables y servicios ecosistémicos (Lal, 2020). Los mercados locales se multiplicaron, al igual que las iniciativas de productores familiares para entregar cestas de alimentos frescos a domicilio y las iniciativas de donación de alimentos a comunidades de bajos ingresos. Muchos habitantes de las zonas urbanas —en especial nuevos migrantes, personas sin papeles y trabajadores informales— se vieron obligados a acudir a bancos de alimentos y organizaciones benéficas, con gran detrimento de su dignidad y arbitrio (Rao et al., 2020). Estas experiencias ponen de relieve la importancia y el potencial de la dimensión territorial de los sistemas alimentarios para la realización del derecho humano a la alimentación (Recine et al., 2021).

Dada la importancia social y económica de las zonas urbanas, es imprescindible abordar los desafíos que plantea la urbanización en relación con la transformación rural, a fin de “reconstruir mejor” tras la pandemia de COVID-19 y las perturbaciones de las cadenas de suministro causadas por la guerra en Ucrania, los conflictos internos y los desastres naturales. Es de vital importancia que las políticas aborden la pobreza y la desigualdad, fomenten la resiliencia y la inclusión social y promuevan medios de vida sostenibles. Las necesidades específicas de los diversos contextos rurales y urbanos, la diferencia entre los distintos tipos de zonas urbanas (p. ej. megaciudades y municipios en zonas mayoritariamente rurales) y los vínculos entre ellas en zonas rurales y urbanas deberían tenerse en cuenta a la hora de formular políticas alimentarias. Por ejemplo, la Nueva Agenda Urbana insta a integrar la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional en la planificación urbana y territorial (ONU-Hábitat, 2016). El informe también podría examinar cuestiones específicas relacionadas con la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición a las que se enfrentan las ciudades en situaciones de conflicto, desastres naturales y otras crisis, en especial cuando dependen de alimentos importados y son vulnerables la volatilidad de los precios.

Es necesario un análisis más profundo de los sistemas alimentarios en el contexto de la urbanización y la transformación rural para garantizar la realización del derecho a la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional en sus seis dimensiones (GANESAN, 2020). En particular, el informe podría investigar el potencial de los mercados territoriales e informales, la economía circular y las cadenas de suministro más cortas para reforzar los vínculos entre la producción y el consumo de alimentos urbanos y periurbanos. El papel de los entornos alimentarios en zonas urbanas es especialmente importante, dada la coexistencia de la distribución organizada (supermercados) y los mercados territoriales e informales, y los efectos negativos de la proliferación de supermercados, que relegan a los establecimientos minoristas de venta de alimentos pequeños y/o informales (Peyton et al. 2015). Es por ello que, algunas partes de las ciudades a menudo las más pobres se han convertido en “desiertos alimentarios” sin apenas productos frescos y saludables. Esto afecta a las dietas urbanas, que ya se caracterizan por dar mayor prioridad a alimentos procesados y precocinados. Además, los centros urbanos y sobre todo las zonas de asentamientos informales se suelen caracterizar por la falta de infraestructuras básicas como el acceso a agua potable y aguas residuales. Por tanto, es necesario prestar atención específica a las necesidades de agua y saneamiento en relación con la utilización de alimentos en zonas urbanas y periurbanas.

Al mismo tiempo, en las zonas urbanas y periurbanas albergan hay innovaciones interesantes para la producción, transformación y distribución de alimentos como huertos verticales, grupos de compra ética e innovaciones de comercialización, que podrían reproducirse en otros contextos. Para reforzar el papel de los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos, es fundamental reflexionar sobre la estructura de la gobernanza de la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición. Y en especial sobre cómo los ayuntamientos, los expertos en planificación urbana y otros asociados pueden colaborar con actores tradicionalmente involucrados en los sistemas alimentarios y las políticas de seguridad alimentaria y nutrición para potenciar las sinergias. Algunas de las medidas en materia de políticas que se han recomendado en los últimos años para reforzar el papel de los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos están relacionadas con la promoción del acceso equitativo a la tierra y los recursos agrícolas productivos para los pequeños productores; la inversión en infraestructuras rurales y urbana; el desarrollo de mercados territoriales y cadenas de suministro cortas; la priorización de la población en situación de pobreza en ciudades y zonas rurales para pueda acceder a alimentos nutritivos y condiciones de vida más saludables; y la anticipación al futuro interconectado de la urbanización y la transformación rural (GANESAN, 2020; Heck y Alonso, 2021).

Sobre la base de los resultados del Grupo de trabajo de composición abierta del CSA sobre urbanización, transformación rural e implicaciones para la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición (CFS 2017/44/6 y CFS 2016/43/11), la bibliografía reciente y los debates sobre políticas, el informe examinará estas cuestiones y formulará recomendaciones sobre políticas para el CSA.

PREGUNTAS PARA ORIENTAR LA CONSULTA ELECTRÓNICA SOBRE EL ALCANCE DEL INFORME DEL GANESAN

El GANESAN desea conocer su opinión sobre el alcance propuesto del informe “Fortalecimiento de los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos para alcanzar la seguridad alimentaria y afianzar la nutrición en el contexto de la urbanización y la transformación rural”. En particular, les invita a:

A

Compartir sus comentarios sobre los objetivos y el contenido propuesto de este informe. ¿Considera que el alcance propuesto es suficientemente amplio para analizar y debatir las cuestiones fundamentales relacionadas con el papel de los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos en el logro de la seguridad alimentaria y la mejora de la nutrición? ¿Hay alguna laguna u omisión importante?

B

Compartir buenas prácticas y experiencias exitosas sobre el fortalecimiento de los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos en el contexto de la urbanización y la transformación rural, incluidos casos de emergencias o conflictos.

C

Compartir bibliografía, estudios de casos y datos recientes que puedan ayudar a responder a las siguientes preguntas:

1.            ¿Cuáles son los principales obstáculos que dificultan la contribución de los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos a la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición?

2.            ¿Cómo se pueden transformar los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos de forma que sean más equitativos y accesibles, tanto para sus actores como en términos de los resultados en materia de seguridad alimentaria y nutrición?

3.            ¿Cómo se puede reforzar la resiliencia de las cadenas urbanas de suministro de alimentos —formales e informales, locales y mundiales— a fin de garantizar la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición en entornos urbanos?

4.            ¿Qué se debe cambiar en la planificación urbana para proporcionar mejor apoyo a todas las dimensiones de la seguridad alimentaria, incluido el apoyo a los derechos humanos, el arbitrio y la sostenibilidad? ¿Cuáles son algunas de las medidas que pueden fortalecer el arbitrio de los actores locales en los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos? 

5.            ¿Cómo pueden los gobiernos nacionales y municipales fomentar ciudades y pueblos con bajas emisiones de carbono, inclusivos, relativamente autosuficientes y resilientes, a fin de impulsar la mejora de la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición a raíz del cambio climático y otras crisis?

6.            ¿Cuáles son las políticas más apropiadas (y las lagunas en las políticas ya existentes) en zonas urbanas y rurales para abordar cuestiones relativas a la tenencia de la tierra, la expansión urbana en tierras agrícolas y la creciente competencia por los recursos naturales?

7.            ¿Cómo pueden los sistemas alimentarios urbanos y periurbanos garantizar que se satisfacen las necesidades alimentarias y nutricionales de grupos específicos de personas, como migrantes, desplazados internos, niños, adolescentes, etc.?

8.            ¿Cuáles son los posibles beneficios y desafíos de los mercados territoriales para el fortalecimiento de la seguridad alimentaria y la nutrición de las poblaciones urbanas?

9.            ¿De qué forma puede generar beneficios climáticos secundarios para todos y reforzar la resiliencia al cambio climático la incorporación de prácticas de agricultura resiliente al clima y economía circular?

10.         ¿Cómo se puede involucrar y empoderar a la ciudadanía a fin de impulsar procesos inclusivos, transparentes y participativos para las transformaciones urbanas, velando por las sinergias y complementariedad con los ayuntamientos?

11.         ¿Qué experiencias de comunidades urbanas para aumentar el acceso a alimentos frescos y dietas saludables pueden inspirar políticas públicas más amplias?

EL GANESAN utilizará los resultados de esta consulta para elaborar el borrador cero del informe y realizar una nueva consulta electrónica. Posteriormente será revisado por pares y se presentará al equipo de redacción y al Comité Directivo del GANESAN para su finalización y aprobación.

Les agradecemos de antemano sus comentarios y contribuciones sobre el alcance de este informe del GANESAN. Los comentarios son bienvenidos en los idiomas inglés, francés y español.

¡El HLPE-FSN espera una consulta rica!

Évariste Nicolétis, Coordinador del GANESAN-FSN

Paola Termine, oficial de programas del GANESAN-FSN

 


BIBLIOGRAFÍA

Acharya, G. Cassou, E. Jaffee, S., Ludher, E.K. 2020. RICH Food, Smart City: How Building Reliable, Inclusive, Competitive, and Healthy Food Systems is Smart Policy for Urban Asia. Washington, DC, World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/35137   

Battersby, J. 2017. Food system transformation in the absence of food system planning: the case of supermarket and shopping mall retail expansion in Cape Town, South Africa. Built Environment, 43(3): 417-430.

FAO. 2020. Ciudades y gobiernos locales a la vanguardia en la construcción de sistemas alimentarios inclusivos y resilientes: Principales resultados de la encuesta de la FAO "Sistemas alimentarios urbanos y COVID-19". Roma.

Heck, S. & Alonso, S. 2021. Resilient Cities Through Sustainable Urban and Peri-Urban Agrifood Systems. Montpellier, France, CGIAR. Resilient-Cities.pdf (storage.googleapis.com)

GANESAN. 2020. Seguridad alimentaria y nutrición: elaborar una descripción global de cara a 2030. Un

informe del Grupo de alto nivel de expertos en seguridad alimentaria y nutrición del Comité de

Seguridad Alimentaria Mundial, Roma. https://www.fao.org/3/ca9731es/ca9731es.pdf

Krishnamurthy, P. K., Choularton, R. J., & Kareiva, P. 2020. Dealing with uncertainty in famine predictions: How complex events affect food security early warning skill in the Greater Horn of Africa. Global Food Security, 26: 100374.

Lal, R. 2020. Home gardening and urban agriculture for advancing food and nutritional security in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Food Security, 12: 871-876. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-020-01058-3

Langemeyer, J., Madrid-López, C., Mendoza Beltrán, A. & Villalba Mendez, G. 2021. Urban agriculture — A necessary pathway towards urban resilience and global sustainability? Landscape and Urban Planning, 210: 104055. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204621000189

Moseley, W. G. 2001. Monitoring urban food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. African Geographical Review, 21(1): 81-90.

Pelling, M., Chow, W. T. L., Chu, E., Dawson, R., Dodman, D., Fraser, A., Hayward, B. et al. 2021. A climate resilience research renewal agenda: learning lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic for urban climate resilience. Climate and Development, 0(0): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2021.1956411

Peyton, S., Moseley, W. & Battersby, J. 2015. Implications of supermarket expansion on urban food security in Cape Town, South Africa. African Geographical Review, 34(1): 36-54.

Rao, N., Narain, N., Chakraborty, S., Bhanjdeo, A. & Pattnaik, A. 2020. Destinations Matter: Social Policy and Migrant Workers in the Times of Covid. The European Journal of Development Research, 32(5): 1639–1661. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7590571/

Recine, E., Preiss, P.V., Valencia, M. et al. 2021. The Indispensable Territorial Dimension of Food Supply: A View from Brazil During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Development, 64: 282–287. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00308-x    

Rede Brasileira de Pesquisa em Soberania e Segurança Alimentar (Rede PENSSAN). 2021. VIGISAN National Survey of Food Insecurity in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Brazil https://olheparaafome.com.br/VIGISAN_AF_National_Survey_of_Food_Insecurity.pdf

Tefft, J., Jonasova, M., Adjao, R. & Morgan, A. 2017. Food systems for an urbanizing world. Washington DC, World Bank and Rome, FAO.

UNDESA (UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs). 2018. 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. New York. Cited June 2022. https://desapublications.un.org/file/615/download

ONU-Hábitat (Programa de las Naciones Unidas para los Asentamientos Humanos). 2016. The New Urban Agenda. Nairobi. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2021/10/nueva-agenda-urbana-ilustrada.pdf

 

Esta actividad ya ha concluido. Por favor, póngase en contacto con [email protected] para mayor información.

*Pinche sobre el nombre para leer todos los comentarios publicados por ese miembro y contactarle directamente
  • Leer 96 contribuciones
  • Ampliar todo

The proposed scope broadly addresses issues relevant to urban and peri-urban food systems in achieving food security and nutrition.

An important area that should be addressed, in addition, relates to the tenure of land, fisheries and forests, including in relation to recording legitimate tenure rights, their valuation, taxation and spatial planning. These issues are dealt with in the CFS Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the context of National Food Security.

Many countries lack adequate systems for recording legitimate tenure rights; for identifying, analysing and understanding property values; for implementing appropriate equitable systems of property taxation to provide resources for local services, and; for transparent spatial planning systems.

These are important elements in enabling and managing urban and peri-urban agriculture.

Greetings from the University of Manitoba, Canada!

My comment/question is regarding urban and peri-urban food systems. Has there been any research done on the viability of urban community gardens specifically located on car park rooftops (parkades, garage parking lots)? My thinking is that it would make use of urban locations that are often underutilized while creating sites that contribute to a host of community and environmental benefits at a fraction of the cost of traditional green roof tops. Not only would such roof top gardens help reduce food insecurity related to food deserts in urban areas, but they would also create biodiversity within cityscapes, resting spots for pollinators, sequester carbon and filter air pollutants, and reduce the effect of urban heat islands, making them a form of climate resilient agriculture. They would be adaptable and scalable to a wide range of locations and circumstances—as simple as a pot of tomatoes to as elaborate and involved as money and space allow. The sites also have the advantage of being easily accessible to local communities and encouraging the agency of local actors and potentially contributing to community economic development . Existing carparks could be easily retrofitted, and new ones could include purpose-built features. Local governments or city councils could readily support local development of projects one rooftop at a time.

Best regard,

Holly Scotland     

 

Shashi Bhooshan Sharma

Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University; World BioProtection Research Foundation
Australia

Let me take this opportunity to thank you for sharing information on an important project - Strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems to achieve food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation. The proposal is well researched and comprehensive. The project team must be congratulated for this excellent work. Thank you for the opportunity to provide feedback. The project aims to address the challenges of food insecurity and malnutrition in urban and peri-urban areas resulting from urbanization, rural transformation, and policy neglect. However, it could benefit from additional information on specific interventions, policies, and best practices that have been successful in strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems. Additionally, it would be helpful to discuss the challenges of implementing such interventions and policies in different contexts and the need for a tailored approach to suit different urban and peri-urban areas. There appear to be some potential gaps that could be addressed. Here are a few examples:

1. While the proposal discusses the importance of addressing food security and nutrition in urban and peri-urban areas, it does not provide clear goals or objectives for the project.

2. There is limited discussion of policy solutions to the some of the challenges faced by urban and peri-urban food systems. It does not include a comprehensive discussion of potential policy solutions to these challenges.

3. The consideration given to concerns relating to equity and social justice appears to be inadequate. A detailed analysis of how these inequalities are produced or perpetuated by food systems may be helpful in developing plans for addressing these inequalities.

4. While the proposal notes the lack of city-level data and empirical evidence to inform decision-making on urban and peri-urban food policy, it does not provide a plan for how to address this data gap in the proposed project. Without data and evidence, it may be difficult to make informed decisions and ensure that the project is effectively addressing the identified issues.

5. Inclusion of policy and preparedness provision for ensuring biosecurity of the urban and peri-urban food systems.

6. Emphasis on food education such as implementation of concepts like Shokuiku.

In addition to the above, the project may benefit from further consideration of the following to strengthen urban and peri-urban food systems:

  • Technology and innovation: The use of modern technology and innovation can help to increase food production and efficiency in urban and peri-urban areas. This can include initiatives such as hydroponics, precision agriculture, and vertical farming.
  • Food policy: Developing policies that promote healthy and sustainable food systems can have a significant impact on food security and nutrition. This can include measures such as promoting locally sourced food, reducing food waste, and supporting small-scale farmers.
  • Food education: Educating urban residents about healthy eating and food preparation can help to promote better eating habits and reduce the incidence of malnutrition. This can include initiatives such as cooking classes, nutrition education programs, and community gardens.
  • Food waste reduction: Food waste is a major problem in urban areas and reducing it can free up resources and increase food availability. This can be achieved through composting, food banks, and other initiatives that encourage the redistribution of surplus food.
  • Urban farming and gardening: Encouraging the cultivation of crops and rearing of livestock within cities and peri-urban areas can provide a source of fresh and nutritious food for residents. It can also create employment opportunities and promote community participation.
  • Urban food markets: Establishing food markets in urban areas can help to bridge the gap between rural and urban areas by facilitating the exchange of goods and information. It can also promote healthy eating by providing access to fresh and nutritious food.
  • Small-scale food producers: Small-scale farmers and food producers should be supported with access to land, financing, technology, training, and other resources to increase their productivity and profitability.
  • Food policies that prioritize equity: Food policies should prioritize equity and social justice, with a focus on promoting local food systems, supporting small-scale farmers, and ensuring that food is accessible and affordable for all.
  • Food infrastructure: Food infrastructure such as storage facilities, processing plants, and markets should be built to support local food systems and increase access to fresh and nutritious food.
  • Food distribution networks: Food distribution networks should be developed to ensure that fresh and nutritious food is accessible and affordable for all residents, regardless of their income level or location.
  • Food literacy: Increasing food literacy among urban residents can help to promote healthy eating habits and reduce food waste.
  • Food justice and anti-hunger initiatives: Food justice and anti-hunger initiatives should be supported to ensure that all residents have access to adequate and nutritious food.

The proposed scope of the report is already very comprehensive. However, the report is mainly focusing on the production and marketing side of food systems. These are important aspects, but looking at the consumer side is needed as well. A more holistic view on food security, which is taking into consideration the general living conditions of the urban poor and people living in informal settlements on the outskirts of the city will add value to the report.

1. Food insecurity in urban areas is less a problem of food availability in general but a problem of the lack of spending capacity of low income households. Living costs in cities are extremely high, especially for securing shelter and transport. Rents in the regulated and even more in the unregulated informal rental markets are a heavy burden for poor people but have to be paid, even by households with very low and precarious income. I many cases low-income households are forced to save on food and skip meals to be able to pay their rents and transportation costs to get to work.

2. Due to the high rental costs in well-located city areas people have to share the costs and the space they live in. As a consequence, especially poor households often ive in very dense conditions. In many cases, there is no space for food or water storage and there is also no space for cooking. Food has to be bought in the streets or as mostly imported highly processed and unhealthy products, which are easy to prepare e.g. with hot water only.

3. More and more people in urban or peri-urban areas are living in informal or even illegal housing conditions with very bad or even not existent physical infrastructure. Access to water and electricity in these areas is scarce or not available. Drinking water has to be bought at very high prices. There often is no possibility to install cooling facilities and food gets rotted quickly. These settlements are growing fast and unplanned and therefor there is seldom space for markets with fresh local products and vegetables and people are pushed into consuming imported products, which in most cases are highly processed and unhealthy.

4. People living in informal or illegal housing conditions are in a permanent threat of being resettled or even evicted. This hampers them to start with own food production like urban gardening. It also make it difficult for them to organize themselves in all kinds of social networks especially networks related to food access, e.g. food policy councils or similar platforms. In these areas people generally do not have a formal address and therefore they do not qualify for social protection schemes to improve the family income or to get access to governmental food supply schemes like school meals etc.

Conclusion: the improvement of housing conditions based on the human right to adequate shelter is closely related to the implementation of the right to food and nutrition as well as the right to water. It should be mentioned as a pre-condition to improve food security in urban and peri-urban areas.

  1. Natural Resources Institute – University of Greenwich UK
  2. World Vegetable Center – Tanzania, Thailand
  3. WorldFish - Malaysia
  • Ms Lydia O’Meara – PhD Candidate
  • Dr Julia de Bruyn
  • Dr Kendra Byrd
  • Dr Jody Harris
  • Assoc Prof Paula Dominguez-Salas

4.            What changes are needed in urban planning to better support all dimensions of food security – including support for human rights, agency and sustainability? Which are some of the measures that can strengthen the agency of local actors in urban and peri-urban food systems?

7.            How can urban and peri-urban food systems ensure that food and nutrition needs of specific groups of people, such as migrants, the internally-displaced, children, adolescent, etc., are met?

Response: This is a timely topic. Please find below examples and references of key leverage points for improving urban food systems, with a focus on increasing access to nutrient-rich foods recommended for both human and planetary health (e.g., fish and aquatic foods) for nutritionally vulnerable groups. Examples are given for both external (built) food environments and personal (individual) environments.

To improve the micronutrient adequacy and diet quality of urban populations, it is important to improve, and scale:

  • Safe and affordable food preservation and packaging methods for highly perishable, yet often the most nutritious foods, such as animal source foods (including fish), fruits and vegetables.Examples are given for fish and aquatic foods.
    • Technology for fish smoking in West Africa. Smoked fish is a nutritious and largely safe food (Byrd et al, in preparation) important to diets in Western Africa and the Eastern Africa Great Lakes Region (de Bruyn et al, 2021), but smoke inhalation among the processors and their families can lead to excess morbidity (Weyant et al, 2022). Improved technology for fish smoking that both reduces fish waste and loss and to improve the health of the fish processors is available but has yet to be scaled (Akintola and Fakoya, 2017). The fish processors also need access to financing to purchase new tools (such as improved fish smokers) and to invest in small enterprises, making them resilient to external market forces and securing this aspect of the fisheries value chain for generations to come.
    • Extending the value chains / reach of small, dried fish products within the Eastern African Great Lakes Region could help improve the diet quality of children that live close to urban markets (e.g. those that live far from lakes and rivers) (O’Meara et al., 2021a, Byrd et al, 2021).
    • Ongoing spatial analysis of GIS-tagged nationally representative secondary data (e.g. Demographic and Health Surveys, Global Lakes and Wetlands Database, SWOT — Surface Water and Ocean Topography database, Accessibility to Cities databases) sources could provide affordable methods for monitoring and evaluating supply chain access to nutritious foods such as fish from capture fisheries (O’Meara et al., 2021a).

Physical access to food sources:

  • Many urban populations, especially the most marginalised (i.e. poorest living in slums) are often limited to accessing food sources that are within walking distance – due to constraints in the availability, affordability and suitability of public transport, and time and convenience of travel to more distant food sources. These barriers may be exacerbated for older people, those with disability, or those with children. Therefore, urban planning needs to prioritise decentralisation of urban wet markets / farmers markets and improvement of urban walkability (O’Meara et al 2021b; O’Meara(b) et al. in preparation). This would also make food environments more resilient in the face of future health crises such as epidemics.

Delivery of social protection programmes

  • Uneven delivery of services / poor implementation (e.g. weaknesses in delivery of existing social protection programmes, logistical barriers for marginalized groups such as elderly, migrants, and those under house quarantine in accessing government cash assistance)  is a strong barrier to achieving food security for marginalised groups, especially during emergency responses; therefore, adequate monitoring and evaluation is critical to inform improvement of policy roll-out to (i) build foundational resilience before emergencies, and (ii) enhance effectiveness of acute responses (O’Meara(b) et al, in preparation).

Regarding the scope – it would be nice to see this report extend beyond the built environment (e.g. availability, development of preservation methods for nutrient-dense foods/extension of supply chains, walkability of cities, proximity of markets) to also many of the personal food environment dimensions that mitigate the ability of individuals to interact with and procure healthy food from the external food environment, such as physical accessibility (transport access, disability, age, caregiving responsibilities, time, housing affordability/residential location), financial accessibility (e.g. women’s financial autonomy, livelihoods for vulnerable groups), and positive resilient community behaviours (e.g. social support/networks)

To make food systems more resilient to shocks – urban planning should also focus on strengthening personal food environment dimensions, alongside improving healthfulness of the external built environment.

Foster social capital / support and networks:

  • During Covid-19 mobility restrictions, studies highlight the importance of strong social support / networks for food security, especially for women and other marginalised groups. Therefore, urban planning should prioritise policies that strengthen urban community connections, and development and maintenance of strong social networks such as safe community meeting places and support for self-help groups (O’Meara et al 2021b; O’Meara(b) et al. in preparation).

Enhance personal agency

  • Women’s personal agency is a strong determinant of a woman’s ability to procure sufficient healthy food (O’Meara(a) et al, in preparation; Hope et al, in preparation). Constraints on women’s financial autonomy and women’s time use are strong barriers to dietary adequacy. Therefore, it is important that policies: (i) devise equitable strategies to enhance food security for women, including financial empowerment strategies; and (ii) monitor and evaluate short and long-term effects of urban planning on women’s personal agency indicators at multiple levels (e.g. women’s financial autonomy and physical mobility), alongside women’s nutrition and health outcomes.

 

References:

Akintola, S. L. & Fakoya, K. A. Small-scale fisheries in the context of traditional post-harvest practice

and the quest for food and nutritional security in Nigeria. Agric. Food Secur. 6, 1–17 (2017).

Byrd, K. A., Pincus, L., Pasqualino, M. M., Muzofa, F. & Cole, S. M. Dried small fish provide nutrient

densities important for the first 1000 days. Matern. Child Nutr. e13192 (2021) doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13192.

de Bruyn J, Wesana J, Bunting SW, Thilsted SH, Cohen PJ. Fish Acquisition and Consumption in the African Great Lakes Region through a Food Environment Lens: A Scoping Review. Nutrients. 2021; 13(7):2408. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu1307240

O’Meara, L., Cohen, P.J., Simmance, F., Marinda, P., Nagoli, J., Teoh, S.J., Funge-Smith, S., Mills, D., Thilsted, S., Byrd, K. (2021a) Inland fisheries critical for the diet quality of young children in sub-Saharan Africa, Global Food Security, 28, 100483, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100483.

O’Meara, L., Turner, C., Coitinho, D.C., Oenema, S. (2021b) Consumer experiences of food environments during the Covid-19 pandemic: Global insights from a rapid online survey of individuals from 119 countries, Global Food Security, 100594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100594.

O’Meara, L., de Bruyn, J., Dominguez-Salas, P., Turner, C., Hope, T., Wellard, K., Stoynova, M., Ferguson, E. (2022) Characteristics of food environments that influence food acquisition and diets of women in low-and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol (JBI Evidence Synthesis JBIES-21-00482).

Hope, T.; O'Meara, L.; Ohl, M.; O'Mullan, C. (2022) The impact of women's empowerment in food systems on women's dietary diversity in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis (protocol). PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022298612 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022298612

Weyant, C. L. et al. Occupational Exposure and Health in the Informal Sector: Fish Smoking in Coastal Ghana. Environ. Health Perspect. 130, (2022).

In preparation:

Byrd, K., Li, H., Fakoya, K. & Fiorella, K. Fresh large fish are commonly consumed among women in

Nigeria, but dried small fish are the richest in iron, zinc, calcium, and vitamin B-12.

O’Meara(a), L.; de Bruyn, J.; Dominguez-Salas, P.; Hope, T.; Fago, M.; Hodge, R.; Turner, C.; Stoynova, M.; Wellard, K.; Ferguson, E. (in preparation). Conceptual framework of food environments for women in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review.

O’Meara(b), L.; Sison, C; Isarabhakdi, P.; Turner, C.; Harris, J. (in preparation). ‘Whatever we have is what we eat’ the lived experience of the COVID-19 pandemic on food environments and diets of marginalised urban groups in the Philippines and Thailand.

Hope, T.; O'Meara, L.; O'Mullan, C. (in preparation) The impact of women's empowerment in food systems on women's dietary diversity in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Dear HLPE-FSN team,

Thank you for the opportunity to participate at this online consultation on "Strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems to achieve food security and nutrition in the context of urbanization and rural transformation“. On behalf of the Brazilian Ministry of Rural Development and Family Farming (MDA), we would like to share the attached document, which has some comments and national experiences on the topic. 

Best regards,

Brazilian Ministry of Rural Development and Family Farming (MDA) - Office for International Affairs

L'alimentation est un élément clé des objectifs de développement durable (ODD) du Programme de développement durable à l’horizon 2030.

L'objectif de développement durable n°2 vise à éliminer la faim, à assurer la sécurité alimentaire, à améliorer la nutrition et à promouvoir l’agriculture durable. Les cibles visées par cet objectifs consistent notamment à :

  • Éliminer la faim et faire en sorte que chacun ait accès tout au long de l’année à une alimentation saine, nutritive et suffisante ;
  • Mettre fin à toutes les formes de malnutrition ;
  • Doubler la productivité agricole et les revenus des petits producteurs alimentaires ;
  • Assurer la viabilité des systèmes de production alimentaire ;
  • Accroître l’investissement en faveur de l’infrastructure rurale ;
  • Corriger et prévenir les restrictions et distorsions commerciales sur les marchés agricoles mondiaux ;
  • Adopter des mesures visant à assurer le bon fonctionnement des marchés de denrées alimentaire.

    Les femmes et les enfants restent les plus vulnérables. Le contexte de crise est aggravé par l’immobilisme politique, le ralentissement de la croissance économique et les faiblesses structurelles en matière de développement.  

  • la population est en insécurité alimentaire ;
  • la population à un accès difficile aux infrastructures et services sociaux de base de qualité ;
  • les voies de communications sont délabrées et peu praticables ;
  • des ménages ont une faible revenue

A Do you find the proposed scope comprehensive to analyze and discuss the key issues concerning the role of urban and peri-urban food systems in achieving food security and nutrition? Are there any major gaps or omissions?

All dimensions of food security should be addressed. For example, the aspect of food availability could take into account aspects such as physical availability of food considering value chain aspects such as production, processing, reserves, markets as well as transportation (but being mindful of the GHGs), secondly the dimension of utilization (i.e. maximizing nutrients and energy, including preparation, serving, inclusion of various diets and lastly accessibility and stability – by ensuring a better integration of resources between rural and urban areas, procurement policies and accessibility despite physical and economic constraints, exploring opportunities in local food production and shorter supply chains

B Share good practices and successful experiences on strengthening urban and peri-urban food systems in the context of urbanization and rural transformation, including in the case of emergencies or conflicts.

  • Use public food procurement (including for school meals) to support shorter food supply chains and small-scale farmers
  • Support food sharing practices, which allow to enhance urban-rural linkages through knowledge and skills sharing
  • Strengthen fresh food markets (e.g. develop enabling policy environment for local fresh food markets to grow, support smallholder access to markets by providing infrastructure, finance and business assistance, connect market actors with local authorities)
  • Create market opportunities for small-scale producers and facilitate direct relationships between producers and consumers.
  • Facilitate access to land for farmers, including in peri-urban areas (local authorities have a key role to play as they can act on land they own, regulate the way others act, and convene and facilitate connections)

C Share recent literature, case studies and data that could help answer the following questions:

1. What are the main bottlenecks hampering the contribution of urban and peri-urban food systems to food security and nutrition?

  • Lack of collaboration between local government, local farmers, local consumers and local non-government organizations

2.  How can urban and peri-urban food systems be transformed and made more equitable and accessible both for food system actors and in terms of food security and nutrition outcomes?

3. How can urban food supply chains, formal and informal, local and global, be made more resilient to ensure food security and nutrition within urban settings?

Resilient food supply chains require short distances, support to small-scale farmers and diversification of food production to build more self-sufficiency in the territory. Example of key projects are COACH and SchoolFood4Change 

4. What changes are needed in urban planning to better support all dimensions of food security – including support for human rights, agency, and sustainability? Which are some of the measures that can strengthen the agency of local actors in urban and peri-urban food systems?

  • Develop a set of resilience indicators to support countries on a local and national level in developing more Resilient food systems

5. How can national and municipal governments strengthen the potential for low-carbon, inclusive, relatively self-sufficient and resilient cities and towns to drive improved food security and nutrition in the wake of climate change and other crises?

6.  What are the most appropriate policies (and gaps in existing policies) along the rural-urban continuum to address issues of land tenure, urban expansion into farmland and the growing competition for natural resources?

COACH aims to facilitate collaboration between farmers, consumers, local governments and other actors to scale up short agri-food chains which rebalance farmers’ position, create win-wins for producers and consumers and drive innovation in territorial food systems

7.  How can urban and peri-urban food systems ensure that food and nutrition needs of specific groups of people, such as migrants, the internally-displaced, children, adolescent, etc., are met?

Identify the barriers and factors that influence dietary behaviors of different groups, taking into account geographic, socioeconomic, behavioral, gender, and cultural differences. The project places particular emphasis on a multi-stakeholder approach, always prioritizing the needs and interests of vulnerable groups and ensuring that no one is left behind (FEAST)

8.  What are the potential benefits and challenges of territorial markets for strengthening food security and nutrition for urban populations?

  • Extended food value chains and power imbalances make it difficult for farmers to access markets and earn a decent income.
  • COACH facilitates collaboration between farmers, consumers and local governments to scale up short agri-food value chains to create a favorable conditions for both producers and consumers

 9. In what ways can the incorporation of climate resilient agricultural and circular economy practices in urban and peri-urban agriculture provide climate co-benefits for all and enhance climate resilience?

The framework of circular food systems offers actionable steps to decrease overall waste production and resource consumption. It also offers various co-benefits:

  • Climate action: Circular food systems decrease need for new production, protect carbon sinks and create new sources of sustainable energy (e.g. from waste heat, anaerobic digestion of organic waste).
  • Resilience: Circular food systems reduce reliance on scarce resources, support resource efficient infrastructure and diversify the sources of key resource flows such as energy and water.
  • Biodiversity protection: Circular food systems reduce waste production and pollution as well as pressure on natural resources.
  • Inclusion: Circular food systems  increase access to products and services through the promotion of waste prevention and resource sharing.
  • Innovation: Circular food systems create opportunities for local innovations and business opportunities.

Adopting a systemic innovation approach, implementing diverse innovation actions across nine real-life food chains, called Systemic Innovation Living Labs (ZeroW)

10. How can citizens be engaged and empowered to drive inclusive, transparent, participatory processes for urban transformations, ensuring synergies and complementarity with city councils?

  • Fostering experimentation and learning
  • Food Policy Councils can also be used in participatory processes  
  • Inclusive food systems

11.  Which experiences of urban communities to increase access to fresh food and healthy diets can inspire broader public policies?

Develop the Food Sharing Compass, a social innovation support platform for policy makers, food supply actors, researchers, and citizens and help these stakeholders to navigate food sharing landscapes and cultures to understand, develop, replicate, scale out and strengthen food sharing (Cultivate project)

 

The proposed scope is adequate especially in addressing  the impact of urban and peri-urban agriculture on food system.  

1). Butungo, S. (2013). Effects of Urban and Peri Urban Land Use Changes on Forest Ecosystem Services: The Case of Pugu and Kazimzumbwi Forest Reserves in Dar es Salaam and Kisarawe. Tanzania. Unpublished Masters Dissertation. Department of Urban and Regional Planning. Ardhi University. Dar es Salaam. Tanzania.

2).  Lupala, J. M. (2016). The effects of peri-urbanization on Pugu and Kazimzumbwi forest reserves, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Int. J. Phys. Hum. Geo3(2), 49-92.

 3). de Bruin, S. P., & Dengerink, J. (2020). The impact of urbanisation on food systems in west and East Africa: Opportunities to improve rural livelihoods. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.

4).  Toku, A., Osumanu, I. K., Owusu-Sekyere, E., & Amoah, S. T. (2021). Conflicting urban land uses at the fringes: issues and experiences of peri-urban farmers in an urbanizing city in Ghana. SN Social Sciences1, 1-23.