Michael Riggs

Michael Riggs

Organization FAO
Organization type International Organization
Organization role
.
Country Italy
Area of Expertise
.

An enthusiastic member of the e-Agriculture Community since its founding, and a former Team Leader (lead facilitator). Active in the field of information and communication technologies for development. Currently a programme officer at the Asian and Pacific Training Centre for Information and Communication Technology for Development (unapcict.org), supporting ICTD capacity development intiatives in the Asia-Pacific region. A member of the ICTD Collective and of Orbicom.

This member participated in the following Forums

Forum Forum: "ICT and producer organizations" November, 2012

Question 1 (opens 12 Nov.)

Submitted by Michael Riggs on Tue, 11/20/2012 - 14:30

Through other interactions in the e-Agriculture Community we know that traceability is increasingly important to local communities and producer groups, particularly those producing products with high value or export potential. A well known case is the shea butter producing women’s groups in Ghana that Oumy Ndiaye wrote about here http://www.e-agriculture.org/es/blog/rural-women-want-more-access-icts

Another example is Sustainable Harvest’s RITS, which is used by coffee cooperatives in Africa and Latin America http://www.e-agriculture.org/content/sustainable-harvests-relationship-information-tracking-system-rits-ict-and-ag-profile-usaid

Submitted by Michael Riggs on Mon, 11/19/2012 - 10:19

Thank you Lucy. You may have identified an area where development organizations, in collaboration with producer organizations, should put greater emphasis on the use of ICT.

Submitted by Michael Riggs on Fri, 11/16/2012 - 17:23

Gerard, you ask the questions that are the reason the e-Agriculture Community came into existence 5 years ago. We hope that through the networking, information sharing, and focused discussions such as this forum, piece by piece we will find all the answers.

Submitted by Michael Riggs on Thu, 11/15/2012 - 11:06

Dear Ravishankar, thank you for this overview of the situation in India and the types of information and services involving ICT. As there are many types of producer organizations in India, from self-help groups to IFFCO, are you aware of any examples where the organizations are using or faciliting their members' use of ICT?

Thanks.

Submitted by Michael Riggs on Thu, 11/15/2012 - 10:57

Thanks Fatima, this is an intersting example. Is there any information on who is supporting the initiative? Is the vegetable industry council working alone, or do they have financial support from government or another party? Also, is the local mobile network operator directly involved in the project (or is the project just making use of the mobile network service)?

Thanks.

Submitted by Michael Riggs on Thu, 11/15/2012 - 10:53

There are several examples of farmers forming organizations that invest in technology or facilities to reduce post-harvest losses. Most of the well known examples focus on facilities like silos or refrigeration units.

Are there examples of producer organizations using ICT to reduce food loss?

Question 3 (opens 19 Nov.)

Submitted by Michael Riggs on Mon, 11/19/2012 - 10:46

Dear all, welcome to the second and final week of this discussion. It is great to see that we are off to a strong start.

Please keep in mind that the questions this week (#3 and #4) are very focused. They are designed to highlight issues that the World Bank and FAO believe are critical when producer organizations use ICT.

Question 3 here covers three points – public sector support (not necessarily limited to funding), producer organizations, the uptake of ICT by producer organizations. Please draw all three of these points together in your responses. [We are not looking for a discussion on agricultural or ICT-related policy issues in general.]

Cheers, Michael

Question 2 (opens 14 Nov.)

Submitted by Michael Riggs on Mon, 11/19/2012 - 10:30

Thank you for this and the Uganda information Joyce. It's valuable to know in the Uganda case how the telecenter is supported with funds. Do you know how the Malaysian centers are funded?

The sustainability of telecenters has long been a topic of discussion. Over the years we have seen several models to cover operating costs, but few examples of self-sustaining centers.

Submitted by Michael Riggs on Fri, 11/16/2012 - 20:00
Are there examples where producer organizations have invested in telecenters?
Submitted by Michael Riggs on Thu, 11/15/2012 - 19:46

James, that is really interesting. Thanks for sharing.

I understand you are in Uganda working with the Nakaseke Community Multimedia Centre. Would you tell us a bit more about your work with producer organizations? What types of organizations are these? How long have you been doing this work?

Cheers.

Become a member

As e-Agriculture Forum member you can contribute to ongoing discussions, receive regular updates via email and browse fellow members profiles.