Measures related to Systemic Shift 3: Increasing the consumption and trade of responsibly produced agricultural commodities
Promoting responsible business conduct, traceability and transparency
Upstream, midstream and downstream businesses are increasingly taking action to eliminate the risk of deforestation from their operations. This follows the recognition that the private sector has an important role to play in reducing its contribution to deforestation. Consumer goods companies, traders, producers and financial institutions can act together and individually by investing in responsible business practices, traceability and transparency. These include defining and implementing responsible sourcing policies, identifying and mitigating the risks of deforestation, and engaging in multistakeholder initiatives to decouple their supply chains from deforestation. In addition, they can work with their suppliers, reward responsible production practices, and strengthen transparency by publicly disclosing the results and progress of the implementation of forest commitments. Assurance and licensing systems, sectoral standards and certification schemes can also enhance corporate traceability.
| Guidance | · OECD-FAO guidance: OECD-FAO Business Handbook on Deforestation and Due Diligence in Agricultural Supply Chains · OECD-FAO guidance: OECD-FAO Guidance for Responsible Agricultural Supply Chains · OECD guidance: Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct · Preferred by Nature toolkit: Due Diligence toolkit |
| Academic publications | · Berning, L., & Sotirov, M. 2023. Hardening corporate accountability in commodity supply chains under the European Union Deforestation Regulation. REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 17(4), 870–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12540 · Chandra, A., Garrett, R., Carlson, K., Heilmayr, R., Stigler, M., Benedict, J., & Grabs, J. 2024. How well does the implementation of corporate zero-deforestation commitments in Indonesia align with aims to halt deforestation and include smallholders? ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad33d1 · Grabs, J., Cammelli, F., Levy, S., & Garrett, R. 2021. Designing effective and equitable zero-deforestation supply chain policies. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102357 · Partiti, E. 2022. Private Processes and Public Values: Disciplining Trade in Forest and Ecosystem Risk Commodities via Non-Financial Due Diligence. TRANSNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 11(1), 141–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102521000182 |
| Case studies/ examples | OECD-FAO Handbook on Deforestation and Due Diligence in Agricultural Supply Chains A growing number of companies have committed to reducing deforestation related to the sourcing of agricultural commodities, either individually or collectively through trade bodies such as the Consumer Goods Forum. Many companies are making use of due diligence approaches to reduce the risk associated with sourcing agricultural commodities commonly linked to deforestation. Due diligence refers to the process by which enterprises identify, prevent, mitigate and account for how they address the actual and potential adverse impacts of their own operations, their supply chains, and other business relationships. To support companies in complying with due diligence requirements and voluntary commitments, several good practice and guidance briefs have been developed. Among these, the OECD-FAO Handbook on Deforestation and Due Diligence in Agricultural Supply Chains provides a comprehensive step-based approach to help enterprises identify, prevent, and address deforestation-related risks in their operations, supply chains, and business relationships. The five steps presented in the Handbook are to (1) establish a policy on deforestation and strong management systems, (2) identify, assess and prioritize deforestation risks in the supply chain, (3) design and implement a strategy to respond to deforestation, (4) verify supply chain due diligence of deforestation, and (5) report on due diligence to address deforestation. The risk-based due diligence approach described in the Handbook enables companies to adopt a holistic business and management approach for tackling deforestation and forest degradation in their supply chains, covering a wide range of commodities. It also highlights how companies can engage meaningfully with stakeholders in each step of the due diligence process. Since its launch in 2023, a growing number of companies have started using the Handbook to design responsible due diligence practices. For example, the National Federation of Coffee Growers of Colombia used the Handbook to develop due diligence processes that will benefit over 500,000 coffee farming families. Likewise, dedicated Handbook training sessions for members of the Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber (GPSNR) built capacities on responsible sourcing practices. Overall, applying a due diligence approach can help enterprises lead their responsible sourcing efforts while meeting supply chain legislations, which are becoming increasingly common. |
| Guidance | · UN Global Compact guidance: A Guide to Traceability: A Practical Approach to Advance Sustainability in Global Supply Chains |
| Reports | · Proforest report: How good supplier engagement can contribute to delivering on sustainability commitments · WRI report: Traceability and Transparency in Supply Chains for Agricultural and Forest Commodities |
| Platforms | · European Forest Institute knowledge hub: FLEGT Voluntary Partnership Agreements - VPA Unpacked |
| Initiatives/ projects | · FAO and Preferred by Nature initiative: Assurance System Evaluation Framework (draft methodology) · GIZ’s Sustainable Agricultural Supply Chains Initiative |
| Academic publications | · Brandao, A. J., Rausch, L., Munger, J., & Gibbs, H. 2023. Mapping Slaughterhouse Supply Zones in the Brazilian Amazon with Cattle Transit Records. LAND, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091782 · Godar, J., Suavet, C., Gardner, T., Dawkins, E., & Meyfroidt, P. 2016. Balancing detail and scale in assessing transparency to improve the governance of agricultural commodity supply chains. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/035015 · Hinkes, C., & Peter, G. 2020. Traceability matters A conceptual framework for deforestation-free supply chains applied to soy certification. SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 11(7), 1159–1187. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2019-0145 |
| Reports | · FAO report: Zero-deforestation commitments: A new avenue towards enhanced forest governance? |
| Platforms | · Tropical Forest Alliance knowledge hub: Jurisdictional Approaches Resource Hub |
| Initiatives/ projects | · Multi-stakeholder partnership: Tropical Forest Alliance · Multi-stakeholder partnership: Alliance for the Preservation of Forests · Multi-stakeholder partnership: Cocoa & Forests Initiative · Partnership: Consumer Goods Forum Forest Positive Coalition of Action · Partnership: Soft Commodities Forum · Association: Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef · Association: Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS) · Association: Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil · Collaboration platform: Global Platform for Sustainable Natural Rubber · National multi-stakeholder platform: Zero deforestation agreements in Colombia |
| Case studies/ examples | · Private sector roadmap: Agriculture Roadmap to 1.5°C · Moratorium: Amazon Soy Moratorium |
| Academic publications | · Bager, S., & Lambin, E. 2022. How do companies implement their zero-deforestation commitments. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134056 · Boegman, S., Carodenuto, S., Rebitt, S., Grant, H., & Cisneros, B. 2023. Seeing through transparency in the craft chocolate industry: The what, how, and why of cacao sourcing. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100739 · Mueller, C., West, C., Lima, M., & Doherty, B. 2023. Demand-Side Actors in Agricultural Supply Chain Sustainability: An Assessment of Motivations for Action, Implementation Challenges, and Research Frontiers. WORLD, 4(3), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.3390/world4030035 |
| Guidance | · Global Canopy guidance: Finance Sector Roadmap · World Business Council for Sustainable Development guidance: Deforestation-free finance: a guide on tools and frameworks for financial institutions |
| Initiatives/ projects | · Multistakeholder initiative: Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures · UN High-Level Climate Champions initiative: The Finance Sector deforestation Action (FSDA) Initiative · Engagement Initiative: Investor Policy Dialogue on Deforestation · Initiative: Finance Sector Deforestation Action · Financial institutions’ statement: Financial Sector Commitment Letter on Eliminating Commodity-Driven Deforestation |
| Academic publications | · Harris, H. 2024. Financing Environmental Crime: Financial Sector Complicity in Global Deforestation and Opportunities for Regulatory Intervention. In D. Goldbarsht & L. De Koker (Eds.), Financial Crime and the Law (Vol. 115, pp. 43–69). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59543-1_3 · Jaiwant, S. V., Haridasan, A., & Kureethara, J. V. 2024. The Role of Financial Institutions in Addressing Climate Change. In N. Naifar (Ed.), Climate Change and Finance (pp. 103–119). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56419-2_5 · Ngo, M.-L., Kettis, M., Isciel, E., & Carreira, D. 2022. The Investors’ Policy Dialogue on Deforestation (IPDD) Case Study: A Collaborative Engagement Initiative with Governments to Mitigate Investment Impacts Resulting from Deforestation. In Extinction Governance, Finance and Accounting (pp. 392–399). Routledge. |
| Case studies/examples | Financial incentives for producing sustainable soy – the Responsible Commodities Facility Brazil’s Cerrado is the world's most biodiverse savanna, home to five per cent of the planet's animals and plants, yet at risk of deforestation. In recent years, the biome has experienced heightened land use pressures resulting from agricultural expansion – including soy cultivation – that have contributed to significant changes in native vegetation cover.. In response, the Responsible Commodities Facility (RCF) was launched – an initiative to support the production of deforestation and conversion-free soy in the Brazilian Cerrado. RCF provides financial incentives to farmers for shifting to responsible production in addition to working with buyers, retailers, and consumer goods companies to create demand for responsible soy and to improve trade flows. Financial incentives are given in the form of revolving low interest credit lines for crop finance, i.e. acquisition of agricultural inputs (seeds, fertilizers, chemicals) for soy cultivation. Loans are collateralized by soy production and once soy is harvested, they are repaid to investors and loans are renewed. To participate in the RCF’s first fund – the RCF Cerrado Programme 1 – landowners commit to forego their right to legally convert the remaining vegetation on their farms (in excess of legal minimum requirements) and to adhere to other social and environmental requirements, as defined in RCF’s eligibility criteria. Initial investors in the scheme include the UK retailers Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Waitrose. So far, the RCF has raised USD 11 million in the form of “Green CRAs” (a green bond-like instrument) registered on the Vienna Stock Exchange. During its inception period, the RCF Cerrado Programme 1 financed 32 farms from eight farming groups located in 13 municipalities in three states in the Cerrado during the crop season 2022/2023. Harvesting took place in February-March 2023, yielding 42,400 tonnes of soy which has been monitored and independently verified to be deforestation and conversion-free soy. All loans were repaid with no financial default on loan obligations. Loans were renewed in April 2023 for farmers to plant the 2023-2024 crop season. |
| Reports | · World Resources Institute report: Traceability and Transparency in Supply Chains for Agricultural and Forest Commodities |
| Initiatives/ projects | · Civil society initiative: Accountability Framework Initiative |
| Case studies/ examples | · World Resources Institute web article: Complex Supply Chains Are Still a Major Barrier to Ending Deforestation |
| Academic publications | · Carodenuto, S. 2019. Access to information and local democracies: A case study of REDD plus and FLEGT/VPA in Cameroon. INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 21(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554819827293187 · Gardner, T., Benzie, M., Börner, J., Dawkins, E., Fick, S., Garrett, R., Godar, J., Grimard, A., Lake, S., Larsen, R., Mardas, N., McDermott, C., Meyfroidt, P., Osbeck, M., Persson, M., Sembres, T., Suavet, C., Strassburg, B., Trevisan, A., … Wolvekamp, P. 2019. Transparency and sustainability in global commodity supply chains. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 121, 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.025 · Heldt, L., & Beske-Janssen, P. 2023. Solutions from space? A dynamic capabilities perspective on the growing use of satellite technology for managing sustainability in multi-tier supply chains. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108864 |
Aligning trade policies with sustainability objectives
Aligning trade policies with sustainability objectives can constitute a win-win for the environment and sustainable economic development. To leverage trade’s potential as a driver for positive change, governments can, for instance, integrate environment-related provisions for the agriculture, fisheries and forestry sectors in regional trade agreements. Mandatory market-based measures to address deforestation have also been recently adopted and proposed by a number of countries globally. These initiatives can create strong incentives for sustainable production and responsible consumption. At the same time, their effectiveness depends on putting in place a conducive enabling environment that can enhance policy effectiveness and advance bilateral or multilateral dialogue between producer and consumer countries to inform policy design and implementation.
It is also important to consider the potential trade-offs associated with the implementation of such policies and regulations. For instance, they can result (including involuntarily) in additional costs not only on governments and companies in consumer markets (for enforcement, monitoring and due diligence), but especially on farmers, small and medium-sized enterprises, and trading partners in producer countries. These costs include both the initial investment required for compliance and the recurring expenses linked to reporting and verification.
To avoid unintended consequences, it is crucial that such policies are designed taking into account the circumstances and constraints of smallholder farmers and small and medium-sized enterprises, and that they are accompanied by appropriate support measures so that compliance requirements do not exacerbate inequalities but instead open opportunities for more inclusive and sustainable trade.
| Platforms | · WTO standing forum: WTO Committee on Trade and Environment · Plurilateral discussion format: Trade and Environmental Sustainability Structured Discussions |
| Initiatives/ projects | · Government-to-government dialogue: Forest, Agriculture and Commodity Trade (FACT) Dialogue |
| Reports | · International Trade Centre guidance: Step-by-step guide on EUDR |
| Platforms | · EU multi-stakeholder platform: Expert Group/Multi-Stakeholder Platform on Protection and Restoring the World's Forests · EU technical assistance platform: Team Europe Initiative on Deforestation-free Value Chains |
| Case studies/ examples | · Regulation: EU Regulation on Deforestation-free products (EUDR) · Proposed legislation: UK Forest Risk Commodities legislation · Proposed legislation: The US Fostering Overseas Rule of Law and Environmentally Sound Trade (FOREST) Act |
| Academic publications | · Cosimo, L., Masiero, M., Mammadova, A., & Pettenella, D. 2024. Voluntary sustainability standards to cope with the new European Union regulation on deforestation-free products: A gap analysis. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103235 |
Fostering consumer demand for responsibly produced products
Demand for products made of agricultural commodities commonly linked to deforestation, such as beef, soy, palm oil, coffee, or cocoa, has been rapidly increasing in recent years. Consumer choices can make a real difference in pivoting this demand to be met by responsible production. Promoting changes in human diets and consumption patterns towards more sustainable choices, for instance, through awareness-raising instruments, financial incentives and responsible public procurement policies can create win-wins for forest protection, sustainable economic growth, and more diverse and healthy diets.
| Reports | · FAO report: Public Food Procurement for Sustainable Food Systems and Healthy Diets - Volume 1 · FAO report: Public Food Procurement for Sustainable Food Systems and Healthy Diets - Volume 2 · World Bank report: Green Public Procurement: An Overview of Green Reforms in Country Procurement Systems · Chatham House report: Public procurement for sustainable development: A framework for the public sector |
| Initiatives/ projects | · Civil society project: Deforestation Free Schools |
| Case studies/ examples | · National government guidance: France's Guide to Imported Zero Deforestation Public Procurement · Sub-national legislation: New York State's Tropical Deforestation-Free Procurement Act · Sub-national legislation: California’s Deforestation-Free Procurement Act |
| Academic publications | · Falvo, C., & Muscaritoli, F. 2024. Towards Deforestation-Free Public Procurement? Reflections on the Interplay between the Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) and Public Procurement in the EU. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review (EPPPL), 19, 91. |
Reducing food loss and waste
Reducing food loss and waste offers significant opportunities to enhance food security and nutrition, lower production costs and ease environmental pressures and deforestation across the agrifood system. Food loss, which occurs from harvesting up to, but excluding, retail, can be reduced by adopting good practices during harvesting and post-harvest operations, and by applying processing, storage, transport and distribution solutions that preserve the quality and quantity of the product. At later stages of the chain, food waste generated at retail, food-service and household levels can be addressed through measures such as smarter packaging, clearer labelling, and recovery and redistribution, alongside awareness campaigns that encourage responsible consumption. The actors along the supply chain can be incentivized to adopt technical and organizational innovations that lead to food loss and waste reduction, through various mechanisms such as fiscal instruments and legal provisions. Investments by the public sector in physical infrastructure such as roads and reliable energy supplies are critical for food loss and waste reduction. Actions taken to reduce food loss and waste ensure that more of the food that is produced reaches its intended use, which maximizes resource efficiency and reduces environmental impacts and deforestation.
Promoting sustainable livestock diets
This approach focuses on optimizing feed composition and feeding practices to enhance nutrient use efficiency, minimize waste and reduce the environmental footprint of the livestock sector. To meet the increased demand for livestock feed associated with the rise in meat and dairy product consumption, governments and the private sector can promote the sourcing of responsibly produced feed crops and shift to alternative feed sources that do not contribute to deforestation. This approach would help satisfy the livestock sector’s needs while promoting environmental conservation goals. Sustainable livestock diets may incorporate locally sourced feed ingredients, alternative protein sources such as insects or algae, and precision feeding techniques that match nutrient supply to animal requirements. Additionally, improving pasture management, using hydroponic fodder production and promoting the use of crop residues and by-products can decrease deforestation and competition with human food production.
| Reports | · 3keel report: Moving to deforestation free animal feed · Farming Future Food report: Alternative feed sources for sustainable livestock production: Everything you need to know |
| Academic publications | · Aragao, R., Lima, M., Burns, G., & Ross, H. 2022. To clear or not to clear: Unpacking soy farmers’ decision-making on deforestation in Brazil’s Cerrado. FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.942207 · Molossi, L., Hoshide, A., Pedrosa, L., de Oliveira, A., & de Abreu, D. 2020. Improve Pasture or Feed Grain? Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Profitability, and Resource Use for Nelore Beef Cattle in Brazil’s Cerrado and Amazon Biomes. ANIMALS, 10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081386 · Siddiqui, S., Elsheikh, W., Ucak, I., Hasan, M., Perlita, Z., & Yudhistira, B. 2024. Replacement of soy by mealworms for livestock feed—A comparative review between soy and mealworms considering environmental aspects. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04874-1 · Soisontes, S., Freund, F., & Laquai, V. 2024. The future of protein feed: A case study of sustainable substitutes in the German livestock industry. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 26(10), 25199–25226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03676-1 |