Evaluation at FAO

Completed evaluations

Evaluations in FAO assess projects, programmes and strategies to generate and provide evidence-based information that is credible, reliable and useful for decision-making processes. 
14/11/2023

The participatory forest management project was implemented through a partnership between FAO, the Kenya Forest Service, the Kenyan Wildlife Service, Samburu County Government, Kenya Forestry Research Institute, Community Forest Associations and the Suyian Trust. The evaluation assesses the extent to which the project’s global environmental objective and development objective were realized.

13/11/2023

The evaluation focused on FAO SDG 14 related work from June 2016 to June 2021. It assessed: 1) FAO’s capacity to operate transformational change to meet the SDG 14 goals under the 2030 Agenda; 2) the organization’s contribution to the methodological conceptualization, testing, and roll-out of indicators under SDG14 for which it is custodian agency and 3) the relevance and effectiveness of FAO’s partnerships to enhance impact.

07/11/2023

The evaluation seeks to assess FAO's strategies in the DRC and their contributions to rebuilding livelihoods, improving food security as well as issues and challenges related to the operationalization of the humanitarian and development nexus and FAO's contribution to peacekeeping. Evaluation also has an accountability function vis-à-vis FAO management, the Government, partners and various stakeholders, including the beneficiary populations. (in French)

28/09/2023

In 2022, the FAO Office of Evaluation conducted its first country programme evaluation in Ghana covering the period between 2018 and 2022. The evaluation makes six recommendations, which includes FAO strengthening its presence and sights in Ghana and developing explicit corporate policies and tools for effective operations in low-middle-income countries.

28/09/2023

RECLIMA continues to be strategically aligned to national priorities and responds to the adaptation and resilience needs of producers. Some systemic limits to achieving the desired paradigm shift were identified due to the multi-causal complexity of the target populations’ vulnerability. Some challenges were identified in areas of institutional coordination and communication with national partners.

12/09/2023

Acknowledging FAO’s comparative advantage in assisting the initiation of agrarian reform, the evaluation makes a number of recommendations for a successful policy reform, which include continuing to work closely with all involved ministries and stakeholders at all levels, to guide and steer the process from the start through endorsement; alongside a systematic approach to capacity building and training for involved ministries.

12/09/2023

The key lessons learned were on challenges of implementing joint projects in countries with different political economies, importance of national working groups in the coordination of national climate change activities, need to train country coordinators in project and budget management, monitoring and evaluation, communications, and the importance of embedding project into focal ministries/departments for sustainable transitions.

12/09/2023

The evaluation recommended that FAO support the government to ensure the integration of CCA into key policy documents and the integration of the Farmer Field Schools (FFS) into future rural development programmes, including the new Sustenta Programme, and that, in future programmes, FAO will focus on developing value chains and promoting farmers' access to markets.

01/09/2023

The project, funded by the World Bank, benefited from FAO Technical Assistance under Subcomponent 1.1 on capacity building through the Farmer Field School (FFS) approach. The organizational and leadership assets generated by FFS among smallholder farmers are by far the project's most important and effective contributions to better outcomes.

01/09/2023

The project was implemented in China (Huangshan Municipality) and funded by the Global Environment Facility. The rationale behind the project intervention was that the biodiversity conservation objectives were not being fully achieved through the existing mechanisms. The final independent evaluation of the project rated it as Satisfactory, and verified that most of the outcomes and outputs of the project were achieved.